http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : Chaemsaithong, Piya (검색결과 13 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
Grammatical Identities at Work: A Case Study of Courtroom Talk
Krisda Chaemsaithong 한국영어학회 2017 영어학 Vol.17 No.4
Chaemsaithong, K. 2017. Grammatical identities at work: A case study of courtroom talk. Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics 17-4, 729-752. Viewing grammar choices as pragmatically motivated, this study analyzes the ways in which opposing lawyers manipulate clausal components to construct different identities and alternate versions of reality in the opening event of a high-profile American trial. Drawing upon Halliday’s concept of transitivity (1994), or grammatical positioning or social actors, the findings reveal systematic differences between the two sides and ideological bases of the presenters. It is argued that these grammatical choices constitute a powerful instrument in assigning moral agency and negotiating guilt and innocence, thereby potentially striking a profound impact on the outcome of the trial.
-
Stance Expressions in the Courtroom
Krisda Chaemsaithong 한국영어학학회 2015 영어학연구 Vol.21 No.2
Chaemsaithong, Krisda. 2015. Stance Expressions in the Courtroom. English Language and Linguistics 21.2, 41-59. Drawing upon a corpus of three high-profile Anglo-American trials, this study explores stance expressions in legal opening statements. Specifically, the study analyzes the forms and functions of stance resources such as self-mention, hedges, boosters, and attitude markers. The study finds stance expressions to permeate the opening statement. These devices, I argue, enable the lawyer to subtly bypass the legal constraints that prohibit explicit display of personal opinions and comments on the evidence.
-
Relational Negotiation in Legal Closing Arguments
Krisda Chaemsaithong 한국응용언어학회 2016 응용 언어학 Vol.32 No.2
This study explores the ways in which lawyers perform relational work with jurors in an understudied area of courtroom discourse, the closing argument (Rosulek, 2015). Incorporating the concept of engagement (Hyland, 2001, 2005), the qualitative analysis focuses on the form and functions of addressee features, including pronominal choices, questions, directives, references to shared knowledge, and asides. The findings reveal that these features not merely foster solidarity and enhance interpersonal relations between addresser and addressee, but also constitute a key way to the meaning-making process. The findings attest to the centrality of interpersonal negotiation in institutional discourse.
-
Interactive Monologue in Witchcraft Pamphlets’ Prefaces (1566-1621)
Krisda Chaemsaithong 한국영어학학회 2016 영어학연구 Vol.22 No.1
Informed by Goffman’s concept of footing (1981), this study explores multiple voices and speaking roles that a writer may take up in the preface of witchcraft pamphlets, along with their pragmatic functions. The qualitative analysis of thirteen witchcraft pamphlets (1566-1621) explicates the ways in which pamphleteers consistently shift into and depart from three speaking identities (authorial, interlocutory, and character roles). Such distinct patterns strategically serve to promote the reception, and avoid refutation, of the main text.
-
-
-
Krisda Chaemsaithong 한국영어학학회 2013 영어학연구 Vol.19 No.2
Drawing evidence from a corpus of the Essex pauper letters (1731-1837), this study aims to provide an account of the ways in which the writers recruit the clausal pragmatic markers "I think", "I hope" and "" trust" to interact with the addressees in order to achieve their communicative goals. Informed by Sperber and Wilson's Relevance theory (1995), and Brown and Levinson's Politeness theory (1978, 1987), the paper reveals that in this context and genre of writing, the intersubjective function of the pragmatic markers prevails. These markers are mostly introduced for politeness reasons, as politeness helps the writers achieve their discursive goals and establish a harmonious interpersonal relationship with the interlocutors. At the same time, these markers also serve as the cognitive signals that invite the addressees to assess the writers' moves in requesting financial aid in the process of considering whether to grant or deny such a request.
-
Functions of Names in Capital Trials
Krisda Chaemsaithong,Yoonjeong Kim 한국영어학학회 2019 영어학연구 Vol.25 No.2
Viewing every linguistic act as involving choices, this study seeks to understand how naming choices reflect and aid in realizing the ideological positions of language users in institutional discourse. Drawing upon ten opening addresses from the penalty phase of capital trials, the quantitative and qualitative analysis identifies the forms, functions and frequencies of names that lawyers use to refer to the defendants and victims in their speeches. The findings reveal that the two sides differ starkly in terms of naming choices and purposes for which names are used (or not used). Such systematic differences contribute to shaping interpersonal relationships between the trial participants (the jurors, the defendants and the lawyers) and partly constructing aggravating and mitigating circumstances for the person on trial and his impending sentence.
-
Moral Legitimation in Courtroom Discourse: A Proposal
Krisda Chaemsaithong,김윤정 한국영어학학회 2020 영어학연구 Vol.26 No.2
Embracing the view that the legitimacy of a social practice is discursively established and negotiated, this study proposes a linguistically grounded model for moral legitimation and examines how the State (i.e., the prosecuting lawyer) justifies a death sentence. Based on the closing summation of six capital trials, the study identifies key moral legitimation strategies and reveals the State’s ideology about crime and punishment. It is argued that such discursive strategies as evaluation, labelling, analogy, agency assignment, and emphasis on the victim’s lost future not only alienate the person on trial from the jury and the victims but also over-emphasize the “us-them” boundaries. In effect, the State denies specific personal circumstances, as required by the law.
-
Pragmatic Aspects of Personal Pronouns in Courtroom Discourse
Krisda Chaemsaithong 한국영어학학회 2014 영어학연구 Vol.20 No.2
Aiming to shed light on the under-studied monologic genre of the opening statement, this research explicates how lawyers position themselves in relation to the (overhearing) jurors in the courtroom. Drawing upon the prosecution's and defense's opening statements of three high-profile American trials, the study analyzes the use of firstand second-person pronouns. The findings suggest that these pronouns are an integral part of this genre, thereby contributing to making the genre dialogic and interactive. These pronominal devices serve several pragmatic functions, including displaying speaker stance and establishing engagement. As a result, the opening statement becomes argumentative, which stands in stark contrast to the legal requirement of this genre.
KCI
DBpia연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
