http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : Aiharu Furuya (검색결과 1 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
Biomechanical and Anatomical Validity of the Short Posterior Arch Screw
Jun Mizutani,Nozomu Inoue,Yoshihisa Otsuka,Aiharu Furuya,Alejandro A. Espinoza Orias,Takanobu Otsuka 대한척추신경외과학회 2019 Neurospine Vol.16 No.2
Objective: This study was conducted to clarify the validity of the short posterior arch screw (S-PAS). The S-PAS is inserted only in the pedicle-analogue portion of the posterior arch. The S-PAS screw length is almost half that conventional C1 lateral mass screws inserted via the posterior arch (via-PAS). S-PAS reduces the risk of vertebral artery injury (VAI) because it never reaches the transverse foramen. Although the biomechanical validity of various C1 lateral mass screws (C1LMS) analyzed in young specimens have been published, that of unicortically inserted C1LMS such as the unicortical Harms screw, S-PAS, and via-PAS for elderly patients is concerning because of the high prevalence of osteoporosis in the elderly. Methods: Nine fresh frozen cadavers (average age at death, 72.1 years) were used for pullout testing. The bone mineral density of each specimen was evaluated using quantitative computed tomography. Results: The pullout strength of via-PAS (1,048.5 N) was significantly greater than that of the unicortical Harms screw (257.9 N) (p<0.05). The pullout strength of S-PAS was 720.3 N, which was also significantly greater than that of the unicortical Harms screw (p<0.05). Conclusion: The via-PAS and S-PAS are valid surgical options, even in elderly patients. Along with sufficient biomechanical strength, the S-PAS screw prevents VAI.
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
