외기냉수냉방 시스템의 에너지 절약효과에 관한 시뮬레이션 분석

박태신(Park Tae-Shin),김세훈(Kim Se-Hun),박진철(Park Jin-Chul),이언구(Rhee Eon-Ku) 한국태양에너지학회 2005 한국태양에너지학회 학술대회논문집 Vol.- No.-

성년후견과 관련한 개정 민법 및 외국의 법률 등에 관한 연구

박태신 ( Tae Shin Park ) 홍익대학교 법학연구소 2012 홍익법학 Vol.13 No.4

The Part of the Civil Code Amendment Bill was passed 2011.2.18. by the National Assembly, promulgated 2011.3.7. by the President and it shall be im- plemented from 2013.7.1. The provisions that was revised, established or abolished in this time are 130 provisions about the Civil Code general rules, the law of a kinship and inheritance. The contents of a core in this amendment are the contents relevant to abolition of a disability person system and introduction of the adult guardianship system. Taking of the institutional base which can make the protection of elderly people, a mentally handicapped person etc. through this amendment will be stepped forward. Especially, the importance of the responsibility of the state with reference to their welfare and human rights will be emphasized through the change of the above systems used the new sense of values for elderly people`s protection as the foundation. Then, this amendment of the Civil Code was materialized in the result. What will happen to the position of an adult guardianship system in the world? In this paper, the position which an adult guardianship system occupies has been investigated through legislation of advanced nations. Although it is said that an adult guardianship system is made from a legal system into our country, the favorable enforcement could not be collateralized only by the provisions on Civil Code. Therefore if the new legislation which can fill up Civil Code is not carried out and if we don`t examine the problems which have been appeared at the foreign adult guardianship act in the meantime, it cannot deny that many problems may be repeated in our country similarly. So I have compared and examined the contents of the adult guardianship system enforced in each country, looking around the legislation background of the adult guardianship system of South Korea that will be enforced from 2013.7.1. And when an adult guardianship system will be enforced in our country, this paper was created in order to help as substantial in the legislation related so that the trial and error may occur might not be repeated.

소송능력(訴訟能力)에서의 「능력」개념의 재검토를 위한시론

박태신 ( Tae Shin Park ) 홍익대학교 법학연구소 2014 홍익법학 Vol.15 No.3

At first admissibility of a party and person concerned elligibility are necessary for suitand litigation ability is necessary so that the person concerned participates in direct suit. By the way, common view understands that the litigation abilitiy agrees with the legalcapacity in civil law but the few theory understands that the litigation ability agrees withthe capacity for enjoying private right. The above difference is largely attributable tomaking head or tail of the litigation ability as the means of settling civil disputesregardless of the issues. However, the case that can not make out the litigation abilityas the legal capacity according to the change of the system such as adult guardianshipsystems occurs. And the precedents understanding the litigation ability as mentalcapacity in the situation appear in the foreign country. Therefore, I think that it will benecessary to examine discussions about litiagtion ability to realize intention and the legalcapacity in conventional civil law, to retroact again, to go up this and the problem tobe concerned with from the origin, and to review the thing. So I made this article toarrange a future study direction by examining the suit ability theory. Now I have begunthe study of litigation ability for civil law and civil procedure.

정신장애인의 자기결정권과 행위능력 -일본의 성년후견제도를 중심으로-

박태신 ( Tae Shin Park ) 안암법학회 2008 안암 법학 Vol.0 No.27

Nowadays discussion on human rights are focused on the infringement of human rights of the weak by the socially strong persons and social discrimination. Also, the trend of understanding the human rights as the self-realization is getting stronger. Therefore, the concept of the self-determination right and the self-expression right has come to bear a very significant meaning, and in fact it is keenly needed for the disabled, females, foreign immigrants, HIV-positive persons, etc. to overcome social discrimination and human rights infringement and to promote self-realization while making themselves stay in a clear position. Therefore, new legal structures have emerged in various types according to the new ways of thinking about the human rights in such circumstances, and thus it may be said that the relationship between the self-determination right and the legal capacity system of the mentally disabled persons belongs to a very significant subject. Particularly in such a system of making massive production of the uniform and legally incompetent persons like ours, it becomes inevitable to have a large number of subjects that are to be discussed more in the systematic and ideological dimension. Therefore, as a premise for understanding the realities of the Korean system for the legally incompetent persons, the author has conducted a study specifically on the Japanese adult guardship system which makes it possible to take flexible as well as elastic measures in compliance with the degree of everyone`s diversified power of judgment and necessity for protection in order to make the ideology of "respect for sekf-decision" harmonized with the ideology of "protection of oneself" among examples of legislation in foreign countries, and has prepared this writing so that a constant direction may be presented in order to realize the constitutional ideology of human dignity when our civil law will be amended in the future. In other words, as the system for the legally incompetent persons is based upon the modern thought of the 19th century, it has inherently apprehensions of consequently being contrary to the constitutional ideology of a welfare state, so to speak, unconstitutional traits without being conforming to modern legal sense and it has the problem of being a system with too much emphasis on property management rather than on inheritor protection and physical custody. Therefore, it is emphasized that the enactment of the adult guardship law of a new type in consideration of the protection of the disabled of socially weak persons together with completing throughly of the respect for self-determination right, ideology of generalization and respect for survival ability as seen to be the most important ideologies in the modern society while recognizing the problems of the current-effective system for the legally incompetent persons by changing the basic ideological foundation which is existing in the system for the legally incompetent persons, and through doing this, a systematic foundation to protect the disabled of the insufficient ability of judgment is to be set up, and thus ① it is to become an easy system for people`s use in order to promote social welfare fully for the intellectually or mentally disabled persons, ② a system conforming to the Korean economic, cultural and social environment is to be induced through a comparative review while recognizing the presence of the problem of low-level utilization because the currently effective system for the disabled persons is a system that is equally depriving the legal capacity, ③ efforts will have to be made to improve the method of public notices, etc. because, notwithstanding the concerned person, all the family members will not like the current system where all sentenced facts are being publically noticed by making them recorded in the family register.

일부청구(一部請求) 및 그 관련문제에 관한 고찰

박태신 ( Tae Shin Park ) 법조협회 2003 法曹 Vol.52 No.1

신의료기술평가제도와 요양급여대상결정제도에 관한 고찰

박태신(Park, Tae Shin) 한국법학원 2017 저스티스 Vol.- No.162

의학의 발전에 따라 등장한 새로운 의료기술 또는 기존의 의료기술을 토대로 개선된 의료기술이 고안된 경우 그 의학적 안전성 및 유효성을 검증하기 위한 제도로 의료법에서 규정한 신의료기술평가제도가 있다. 그리고 위와 같은 새로운 의료기술 또는 개선된 의료기술을 건강보험의 영역으로 편입시킬 것인지, 사적 자치의 영역에 남겨둘 것인지를 결정하는 제도가 국민건강보험법에 따른 요양급여대상여부 결정제도이다. 위와 같은 두 제도의 관계에 관해 별개의 제도로서 서로 무관하게 각 제도에 따른 결정의 적법여부를 판단할 수 있다는 판례들이 있으나, 새로운 의료기술 등을 건강보험의 적용대상에 포함시킬 것인지 아니면 배제할 것인지는 해당 의료기술이 의학적 안전성 및 유효성을 갖추었다는 것을 전제하는 것이므로 위 판례들은 부당하다. 즉, 의료법에 따른 신의료기술평가제도는 국민건강보험법에 따른 요양급여대상여부결정제도에 선행하는 관계에 있는 것으로 보아야 하고, 위 두 결정이 서로 모순된 경우에는 어느 한 결정이 위법하다고 보아야 할 것이다. According to the development of medicine, there exists a New Health Technology Assessment(nHTA) in Medical Law as a system to verify the medical safety and validity of newly emerging medical technology or improved medical technology developed based on conventional. Moreover, the Decision System for Medical Care Benefits under the National Health Insurance Act makes decisions whether to incorporate the above new medical technology and improved medical technology into the field of health insurance or to leave them in the field of private autonomy. There are judicial precedents decided that it is possible to judge the legality of each administrative measure based on each system, separately and independently. However, those decisions are unjust since new medical technologies to be covered by health insurance or not should be based upon the premise that the medical technology is safe and effective. Therefore, the nHTA of the Medical Law should precede the Decision System for Medical Care Benefits of the National Health Insurance Act. Furthermore, if those decisions are contradictory, one of them should be regarded illegal.

임상시험 대상자 모집방법에 관한 법적·윤리적 검토

박태신(Park Tae Shin) 한국법학원 2020 저스티스 Vol.- No.178

임상시험은 사람이 가진 질병을 예방, 치료, 개선하기 위해 반드시 필요한 절차이다. 그런데 특정한 조건을 충족시켜야 하거나 대상질병 자체가 희귀질환이라는 등의 사정으로 인해 임상시험대상자 등록에 시간과 비용이 예상 외로 많이 소요되는 경우들이 발생하고 있다. 이러한 대상자등록의 어려움은 임상시험을 중단케 하거나 그 비용을 높이는 원인의 하나로 거론된다. 대상자등록은 잠재적대상자모집을 통해 임상시험 참여의사를 밝힌 잠재적 대상자들을 대상으로 하므로 결국 원활한 대상자등록을 위해서는 효율적인 대상자모집이 필요하다. 따라서 효율적인 대상자모집방법의 모색이 중요하다. 한편 임상시험에 참여하는 대상자는 잠재적인 위험을 감수하고 임상시험에 참여하는 것이므로 임상시험에서 대상자의 안전과 복지가 최우선적으로 고려되어야 하는데, 대상자의 존중, 배려, 보호는 대상자의 참여의 자발성 확보에 기초한다는 점에서 대상자의 진정한 임상시험 참여의사를 왜곡해서는 안 된다. 그런데 최근 새로운 방법으로 대두되는 소셜미디어를 이용한 대상자모집이나 시험대상자모집전문회사를 통한 시험대상자 모집은 잘못된 정보의 확산이나 금전적 보상 등으로 인한 부당한 유인이 되는 방법을 이용한 경우가 상당한 실정이다. 이와 같은 문제점에 대처하기 위해서는 임상시험심사위원회의 심사가 좀 더 정밀하고 엄격하게 이루어져야 할 필요가 있고, 시험대상자모집전문회사 인증제나 종사자에 대한 의무적인 교육이 있어야 할 것이다. A clinical trial is a necessary procedure to prevent, treat, and improve a person"s disease. However, due to circumstances such as the need to meet specific conditions or the rareness of target disease itself, there are cases in which the registration of clinical trial subjects takes a lot of time and money unexpectedly. The difficulty of enrolling subjects is considered as one of the reasons to stop the clinical trial or increase its cost. Subject registration is targeted at potential subjects who have revealed their willingness to participate in clinical trials through potential target recruitment, and in the end, efficient subject recruitment is necessary for smooth subject registration. Therefore, it is important to find an efficient method of recruiting subjects. On the other hand, the subjects participating in the clinical trial take potential risks, so the safety and welfare of the subjects should be considered as the top priority in the clinical trial. In the sense that it is based on, the subject’s intention to participate in the clinical trial should not be distorted. However, recruitment of subjects through social media, which is emerging as a new method, or recruitment of subjects through specialized subject recruiting companies may be misused. In many cases, wrong methods are used, which are emphasizing financial rewards or spreading misinformation. In order to cope with these problems, the review by the Institutional Review Board needs to be carried out more precisely and rigorously. And there must be mandatory training for the workers of the companies or certification system for the recruitment company.

일본의 개정 민법에 있어서 채권자대위권에 관한 연구

박태신 ( Park Tae-shin ) 연세법학회(구 연세법학연구회) 2018 연세법학 Vol.31 No.-

채권자대위권제도는 재판에서도, 재판 외에서도 많이 활용되고 있을 뿐만 아니라 그 소송과 관련하여 많은 논의가 지금까지도 왕성하게 진행되어 오고 있다. 특히, 채권자대위권 본래의 목적인 책임재산의 보전을 위해 민법은 404조(채권자대위권) 및 405조(채권자대위권 행사의 통지) 규정만 두고있음에도 판례 등을 통해 오히려 “채권자대위권의 전용”이라는 형태로 실체법적으로, 절차법적으로 매우 다양하게 활용되고 있다. 이와 같은 현실 속에서 일본이 최근 민법 개정을 하였는데, 채권자대위권도 그 범주에 포함되어 있다. 그동안 그 제도의 전용 등에 대한 지·부지에 따라 권리 보호의 흠결을 가져올 수 있을 뿐만 아니라 사전적 예견가능성 또는 사후적 대처가능성 등에 관하여도 많은 문제점을 야기할 수 있다는 지적이 많았는데 개정 민법은 이를 극복하기 위하여 판례의 내용 등을 입법화하였다. 그러나 기존의 판례·통설을 모두 흡수하여 동일하게 입법화한 것이 아니라 나름의 진일보한 모습을 보여주기 위한 입법적 노력이 있었다. 또한, 개정된 부분 중 채권자대위권은 「책임재산 보전형(본래형)」과 「개별적인 권리실현의 준비형(전용형)」의 유형을 명시적으로 입법하여 좀 더 쉽게 접근할 수 있는 제도로 개혁하고자 하는 노력을 하였다. 따라서 이 글에서는 일본의 채권자대위권에 관한 개정의 경과, 내용 및 기능 등을 소개하고 우리의 민법을 개정할 때 시사하는 바가 있는지 여부를 찾고자 하였다. The obligee subrogation system has been used extensively not only in trials but also outside of court and many discussions have been actively pursued in connection with the case. In particular, the original purpose of the obligee subrogation rights is to preserve responsible property, which is stipulated in articles 404 and 405 of the civil law. But nevertheless, court cases have accepted the “diversion of obligee subrogation rights”, and thus have been utilized variously both in substantive law and procedural law. Meanwhile, Japan has recently made amendments to its civil law to include the obligee subrogation right. Until now, there were no legal grounds concerning the diversion of obligee subrogation right, which not only resulted in lack of protection of rights but also posed many problems in terms of predictability and in coming up with posterior measures. To overcome such criticism, Japan legislated some of the court precedents into the civil law. However, the Japanese revised civil law did not reflect all court decisions and leading theories, but exerted original legislative efforts to make a step forward. Among the revisions, the legislature tried to make the law more accessible by explicitly stipulating two types of obligee subrogation right - responsible property conservation type and the preparatory type for realization of individual rights. Therefore, as Korea faces similar problems, this papers aims to introduce the progress, contents and functions of newly-adopted subrogation right in the Japanese revised civil law, and to seek any suggestions or implications regarding the revision of the Korean civil law regarding this issue.

채권자대위권에 관한 이해의 변화 모색 - 보전의 필요성 및 채무자의 무자력과 관련하여 -

박태신(Park, Tae Shin) 한국법학원 2021 저스티스 Vol.- No.186

종래 학설은 채권자대위권을 ‘본래형’과 ‘전용형’으로 구분하여 전자의 경우 보전의 필요성은 채무자의 무자력을 의미한다고 한 반면, 후자의 경우에는 보전의 필요성에 관한 별다른 언급 없이 채무자의 무자력은 요구되지 않는다고 하였다. 이는 전자를 (일반)책임재산보전제도로, 후자를 (개별)채권보전제도로 인식해 온 데에서 기인한 것으로 보인다. 그런데 대법원 2001. 5. 8. 선고 99다38699 판결은 ‘피보전채권과 피대위채권의 밀접한 관련성’, ‘피보전채권의 현실적 이행을 유효, 적절하게 확보하기 위해 필요한 경우’, ‘채무자의 자유로운 재산관리행위에 대한 부당한 간섭이 아닐 것’을 채권자대위권의 ‘보전의 필요성’ 판단을 위한 일반기준으로 제시하였다. 그리고 대법원 2020. 5. 21. 선고 2018다879 전원합의체 판결은 기본적으로 위 요건을 보전의 필요성 판단기준으로 제시하면서도, 피대위권리를 행사하는 것이 피보전채권의 현실적 이행을 유효, 적절하게 확보하기 위해 필요한지 여부에 관한 판단을 위한 고려요소로 ‘채권자가 보전하려는 권리의 내용’, ‘채권자가 보전하려는 권리와 대위하여 행사하려는 권리의 관련성’ 등을 언급하면서 ‘채무자의 자력 유무’는 피보전권리가 금전채권인 경우에 고려할 요소로 제시하였다. 이와 같은 일련의 판결들로 종래의 이원화된 채권자대위권의 보전의 필요성 판단기준이 통일적으로 제시되었으나, 위 전원합의체 판결은 피보전채권이 금전채권인 경우에는 여전히 채권자대위권을 (일반)책임재산보전제도로 인식하고 있는 것으로 보인다. 그러나 법해석의 목표나 현실적 필요성을 고려하면, 피보전채권이 일반금전채권인 경우에도 채권자대위권을 (개별)채권보전제도로 보는 인식전환이 필요한 것으로 보인다. Theories have divided creditor subrogation rights into ‘original type’ and ‘exclusive type’, and the former said that the necessity of preservation means the debtor’s insolvency, while the latter said that the debtor’s insolvency is not required without any particular mention of the necessity of preservation. It seems that the former has been recognized as a (general) responsible property preservation system and the latter as an (individual) claim preservation system. However, the 99Da38699 ruling(the Supreme Court sentenced on May 8, 2001) suggested ‘close relationship between creditor’s claim and subrogated right’, ‘when it is necessary to effectively and appropriately secure the actual implementation of creditor’s claim’, and ‘not unreasonable interference in the debtor’s free property management behavior’ as general criteria for judging the ‘necessity of preservation’ of the subrogation rights of creditors. Also, 2018Da879 the all consensus decision(the Supreme Court sentenced on May 21, 2020) ruled ‘close relationship between creditor’s claim and subrogated right’ and ‘the debtor’s insolvency’ as elements for judging whether the exercise of the subrogated right is necessary. With such a series of judgments, the conventional dualized criteria for determining the necessity of preservation of the creditor subrogation rights were unified, but the all consensus ruling above still recognizes the creditor subrogation rights as a (general) responsible property preservation system. However, considering the objectives and practical necessity of legal interpretation, it seems necessary to shift the perception regarding the subrogation rights of creditors to the (individual) claim preservation system.

의료과오소송에서 증인인 담당의사의 신문 등에 관한 연구 -환자 측 소송대리인의 입장에서-

박태신 ( Tae Shin Park ) 홍익대학교 법학연구소 2015 홍익법학 Vol.16 No.1

For disputes over medical cares, litigations have been raised in order to pursue responsibilities of physicians, medical institutions and nurses, and have been increasing. In medical malpractice measures of doctors or medical institutions make patients disappointed and give patients physical and emotional damages seriously. But physicians who have been filed with medical malpractice lawsuits blame the patients due to the fact that they were judged with unsaticefied result by the patients nevertheless they made an efforts to provide proper treatments as an expert. With these reasons, medical malpractice litigations conflict seriously between the parties compared to common litigations, and is common that parties and litigation officials are caught up with the conflicts. Therefore, in process of accountability of a medical malpractice litigations, the parties need to decide emotional and rational determinations. Especially, it is very important to have proper attitude in examining the doctors in charge as a witness at the court. Therefore, this paper has examined what the patient`s attorneys should notice and consider when they examine the doctors in charge as a witness. And I examined the feature of lawsuits in cases the doctors in charge are the witnesses, and the preparations for the enforcement of the cross examins in medical malpractice lawsuits. I pointed out that the doctors as witnesses are different from a general civil litigation`s witness through this study. And it is noted that a patient`s attorney has to explore how to instill impressions of validity of the plaintiffs` claim in courts rather than cross-examination format by unilateral conflict relationship. Finally, I point out that a patients` attorneys have to examine evaluating evidence in courts and importance of advanced preparations for examinations of the doctors in charge.