http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
A Compatible Variables Scheduling Algorithm for Register Allocation in Microprogram
이상정,임인칠,Lee, Sang-Jeong,Lim, In-Chil The Institute of Electronics and Information Engin 1987 전자공학회논문지 Vol.24 No.2
This paper proposes a compatible variables scheduling algorithm, which is the process to pack variables into same register without modifying program semantics, for efficient register allocation of microprogram. The algorithm constructs T-V matrix, obtains incompatible variable set and scheduling priority, and schedules compatible groups. By this algorithm, the number of compatible groups can be minimized. The algorithm was implemented with C language on VAX-11/780 computer. By applying the algorithm to practical microprograms, the effectiveness of the algorithm is verified.
이상정(Lee Sang Jeong) 성균관대학교 법학연구소 2007 성균관법학 Vol.19 No.2
More than 5 years have passed since our Product Liability Act was enforced. The enactment of Product Liability Act means that the liability system based on the negligence shift to the liability system based on the defect. So many consumer supposed that there was the drastic change in the area of PL. But in reality there is little change. It"s because design defects and warning defects are primarily based on the negligence of producer. And even in the area of manufacturing defects there is little change. Before the enforcement of new act the producer was apt to be liable to the defects he made regardless of his fault or negligence. And Presumption of negligence was applied in many cases.<BR> One of the consumer"s disappointments is the adoption of the "Development Risk" defense(the state-of-the-art defense). It"s prescribed in the § 4① ⅱ of our act. That is as follows:<BR> Article 4 (Exemptions) ① In cases where Article 3 applies. the manufacturer. etc. shall not be liable as a result of Article 3 if he proves;<BR> (1.)<BR> 2. that the state of scientific or technical knowledge at the time when the manufacturer, etc. delivered the product was not such as to enable the existence of the defect in the product to be discovered:<BR> But I think that the adoption of the "Development Risk" defense is not adequate even though many industrial nations accept the state-of-the-art defense.<BR> First of all It"s nearly impossible to find out "the state of scientific or technical knowledge at the time when the manufacturer. etc. delivered the product". Because Scientific knowability refers not to what in fact was known at the time. but to what could have been known at the time.<BR> And the adoption of the "Development Risk" defense means that the human is the means of the development of science or technology. So "Development Risk" defense in our act must be deleted. But for the compromise of innovation and safety. this paper proposed. the compensation may be reduced when the producer observed carefully. warned the hazards and recalled them after delivering the products.<BR> This paper ends with the phrases which were appeared in the "Beshada v. Johns-Manville Products Corp" judgement :<BR> The concept of knowability is complicated further by the fact---that the level of investment in safety research by manufacturers is one determinant of the state-of-the-art at any given time.<BR> By imposing on manufacturers the costs of failure to discover hazards, we create an incentive for them to invest more actively in safety research.
이상정(Sang-Jeong Lee) 한국비교사법학회 2006 비교사법 Vol.13 No.1
There are many Intellectual Property Dispute cases. Among them some cases are settled through ADR. In Korea there are three forms of ADR-negotiation, mediation, arbitration. Among ADR mediation is the most common form of dispute resolution and many committee are established since 1987-for example “The Copyright Commission for Deliberation and Conciliation”(CDCC),“Program Deliberation and M ediation Committee”(PDMC), etc..<BR> But the results are not so successful. Maybe there are many reasons. One of them is the lack of mediator’s ability, enthusiasm. To fulfill these requirement the system must be revised. From government-initiative ADR to private-initiative ADR. From monopoly to competition. In normative view the varieties of effectiveness are also problem. One is the same as that of judgement, the other is that of compromise contract. It needs uniformity.<BR> So I recommend we make the general rule applied to the ADR. Japanese act for promoting the ADR is a good example.