http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
李光鍾 청주대학교 사회과학연구소 1988 한국사회과학연구 Vol.7 No.-
Administrative responsibility is the important concept in developing the normative criteria for the administrative role. Many scholars differ in views on definition of responsibility concept in the public administration. But we can find the two types of administrative responsibility from the different definitions by scholars. First, objective responsibility has to do with expectations imposed from outside oneself, and is obligation to someone else for a particular standard or category of performance. Objective responsibility is not the result of a series of decisions made by oneself about what ought to be done. Rather, it flows from the decisions of others about what an administrator ought to do. Second, subjective responsibility is rooted in experiences like loyalty, conscience, and identification and concerns those things for which an administrator feels responsible. Under the legislative state, public administrators were responsible for complying with the law which the legislative had made. Legal responsibility is similar to objective responsibility because it is obligation to someone else for a certain standard. In order to ensure the administrative responsibility in hierarchical structure, we also need to strengthen the systematization of authority and accountability and operate organization by the balance between two factors. Especially, the contents and functions of public administration become complicated, specialized and technicalized from the early of the 1930's in western countries. Alongside of this trend, administrative discretion power was increased conspicuosly. The stronger and the more concentrated administrative discretion power, the greater the abuse of its power. In this situations we have stressed the necessity of responsible administration to the people. In modern times, most of administrators are concerned in policy formulation, policy implementation, and policy evaluation. I think that a responsible administrator should carry out the public interests and the administrative values. The public interest is clearly a problematic concept. It has been very useful in providing guidance for the practicing administrator. In the administrative state, most administrative scholars have emphasized subjective responsibility. Sometimes, subjective responsibility reenforces administrator's objective responsibility and it is based on the basic determinative beliefs which we refer to as values or principles. As administrator confront problems and issues, administrative values become the guide of feeling and desire to behave himself like a responsible person.
李光鍾 청주대학교 사회과학연구소 1983 한국사회과학연구 Vol.1 No.-
In this paper, the writer has discussed the following dimensions on administrative reform. (1) The definition and some processes of administrative reform. (2) Environment and administrative system. (3) The objectives and main variables of administrative reform. (4) Strategy for administrative reform. Administrative reform is a continuous activity that takes place in such varied circumstance and, therefore, meaningful generalization is difficult. The demand for reform of public administration arises from the malfunctioning of the natural processes of administrative change. Generally speaking, movements of reform begin with the intention of removing obstacles to change or of improving on the results of change where it is being accommodated. Administrative reform is the artificial inducement of administrative transformation, against resistance. Administrative reform is articifial, strategic for the betterment of efficient performance because it is man-made, deliberate, planned; it is not natural, accidental or automatic. Administrative reform is deliberately abstracted from its surroundings to concentrate on the specific stages that reformers experience in their esseneially political struggle to change existing behavior patterns and functional tasks in administrative system.
李光鍾,韓石泰 청주대학교 교육문제연구소 1988 교육과학연구 Vol.2 No.1
The contents of this paper can be divided into three main parts. In the first part, we emphasize the necessity of philosophical viewpoint in the study of public administration and further investigate sub-disciplines of administrative philosophy. They are administrative ontology, epistemology and axiology. We focus our discussion an the ethical value which is one of value type treated in adminisrrative axiology. In the second part, some principal virtues of Confucianism, which can be applied to the behavioral norms of contemporary administrators, are investigated. In the last part, we discuss the dysfunctional elements of Confucian values in comparison with value elements of "development".