http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
타종교에 대한 두 접근법 (비교종교학적 및 종교신학적 접근)에 대한 선교학적 고찰
황원주(Hwang Won Joo) 중동아프리카연구소 2016 아랍과 이슬람 세계 Vol.3 No.-
Two major approaches have been utilized for the study of religions: comparative studies of religions and biblical-theological studies of religions. These two approaches have merits and usefulness for its own unique purposes, but one must not be confused to mix the two for the evangelistic efforts of Christian missions. In specific, one must take note of the subtle dangers and pitfalls from misusing comparative approaches to other religions in missiological studies. Recently new methods or approaches of Muslim evangelism have been proposed under the name of contextualization. Some of these proposals are based on the assumption that there is a significant number of positive features in Islam or many similarities between Islam and Christianity that can provide important ground for exploring better grounds for presenting the gospel to Muslims. While pursuing this line of reasoning to an extreme, some have reached a conclusion that the religion of Islam can be understood in a new perspective. Others even tried to redefine Islam in an unconventional way. One such example is found in the writings of the Insider Movement proponents. This article identifies the unique contributions of the two major approaches of other religions, and contends that the evangelical theological studies of religions based on a sound biblical theology must be the primary ground for dealing with other religions (including Islam) for the Christian missions. It also demonstrates that how the Insider Movement proponents mixed the two approaches in their missiological thinking in their attempts to validate the Insider Movement. Their fundamental errors are proved to be faulty hermeneutical conclusions for certain biblical passages primarily because of two reasons: due to the lack of sound hermeneutical method and due to the lack of sound theology of religions based on healthy evangelical biblical theology.
황원주(Won Joo Hwang) 횃불트리니티신학대학원대학교 한국이슬람연구소 2019 Muslim - Christian Encounter Vol.12 No.2
This paper takes an interpretive investigation of Q 112 (sūrah al-ikhlaṣ) with a particular reference to the widespread anti-Christian sentiment among Muslims. More specifically, this paper attempts to answer the question of how the sūrah incorporates the idea of the anti-Christian polemic in regards to“altawhīd (Islamic monotheism) versus Trinitarian monotheism”. By examining both the modern revisionist approach and the Muslim traditional approach to the Qur’an, the author provides readers with a clear-cut comparison between the various interpretations of the holy text. This excerpt further asserts that sūrah al-ikhlaṣ itself may not contain substantial textual evidence to explicitly prove the soundness of the doctrine of al-tawhīd. This was an outcome of the insertion of the deep-rooted anti-Christian sentiment into the traditional interpretations of sūrah al-ikhlaṣ which ultimately produced weak arguments to confirm the sanctity of the al-tawhīd.
황원주(Wonjoo Hwang) 중동아프리카연구소 2019 아랍과 이슬람 세계 Vol.6 No.-
This study aims to provide an overview of the recent trends in the contemporary Qur’anic studies among Western scholars and to evaluate the missiological implications of these academic researches. Since the historical-critical approaches were applied to Biblical studies, the Qur’an has also become a venue for applying the same methodologies. Traditionally the Islamic narratives on the origin of Islam and the Qur’an were accepted without much doubt by Muslims and Qur’anic scholars as they heavily depended on various resources such as the biographical records and hadiths. The new approach, called the revisionist approach, however, began with the foundational doubt about these Islamic narratives. Doubting the trustworthiness of the traditionally accepted Islamic narratives, the revisionist approach has tried to provide alternative explanations concerning the origin of Islam and the Qur’an. The scholars with this approach have provided challenging findings and even made radical assertions on the origin of Islam and the Qur’an. A modified version of the traditionalist approach, called neo-traditionalist approach, on the other hand, has produced more reconcilable version of Islamic origins with the traditional views even through incorporating new scholarly findings from utilizing new research methods. After reviewing the overall scholarly camps, this paper introduces several representative scholars with their works in terms of their unique contributions to the contemporary Qur’anic studies. This essay also considers the possible missiological implications of the contemporary Qur’anic studies and recommends the desirable steps for Korean missions community in Islamic world.