http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
하보람 ( Boram Ha ),박건영 ( Kun Young Park ) 서강대학교 동아연구소 2016 東亞 硏究 Vol.35 No.1
International Relations (IR) scholar recognize Wendtian constructivism to be a major step forward because of its emphasis on ideational variables in analyzing international relations. However, the authors of this paper argue that Wendt’s characterization of shared values, ideas, and identities is underspecified. We suggest that “the 2014 Virginia decision” is an obvious case in which it loses its explanatory power as Americans in Virginia chose to support the Korean cause despite the fact that Japan rather than Korea is closer to the United States in terms of shared values, ideas, and identities. We believe that the problem derives from Wendt’s “one-size-fits-all” categorization of his conceptual variable. We suggest that, in order to rectify the lack of specificity inherent to constructivism, a distinction between different levels of the ideational variables is necessary. Utilizing this insight, we attempt to identify the contexts under which the “superordinate” values, ideas, or identities split from the “general” ones.