RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • 사이클 지도자의 리더십유형에 따른 선수만족도 및 훈련몰입도의 관계

        최기락 ( Ki Rak Choi ),유병렬 ( Byung Yeol Yoo ) 한국여가학회(구 한국레크리에이션교육학회) 2008 한국여가학회지 Vol.9 No.2

        This study aims to investigate into the relationship between cyclist`s degree of satisfaction and concentration in training based on types of trainer`s leadership. To achieve this purpose, this study targets 220 numbers of men, 75 numbers of women, as total of 295 from cycling athletes in high school, college and corporation, who are registered in Korea Cycling Federation. This study set background variables in gender, position and sports career, independent variables in types of leadership, and dependent variables in the degree of cyclist`s satisfaction and concentration in training. As calculating tools for specifying the type of leadership, LSS(Leadership Scale for Sports) has been used, which was developed by Chelladurai and Saleh(1978) as it has also been applied to the case of Kim Byung Hyun`s in 1990. The degree of cyclist`s satisfaction has been calculated by using the amended questionnaire of Chelladurai(1984), Widmeyer and Williams(1991)`s. ESCM(Expansion of the Sport Commitment Model), which was created by Scanlan(1993), has been applied into this study in its adapted form of questionnaire developed by Jeong Yong-Gak(1997). The statistic specification of demography in background variables was produced in N(number of cases) and Average in Percentage(%) to recognize the general trend of data gained in this study. Independent T Verification has been practiced to find out the difference among the types of leadership, the degree of cycling athlete`s satisfaction, and the degree of the concentration in training. After-Fact Verification has been practiced after The Analysis of One Way-ANOVA was done to find out the difference among types of leadership based on sports career and position, the degree of cycling athlete`s satisfaction, and the degree of the concentration in training. Conclusions are produced as below after Standard Multiple Regression Analysis has been practiced to figure out the relationship between cyclist`s degree of satisfaction and concentration in training based on types of trainer`s leadership First. There are statistically meaningful differences in the type of democratic leadership and the type of social leadership among low level components in types of leadership based on the degree of athlete`s satisfaction (the satisfaction of achieving tasks), as following types of leadership. Second, All low-level components in types of leadership do not show meaningful differences in the degree of the concentration in training (the degree of cognitive concentration, the degree of the concentration in behavior), as following types of leadership.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼