대통령 국정 어젠다와 정책화 과정 평가

차재훈(Cha Jaehoon) 한국정치정보학회 2012 정치정보연구 Vol.15 No.1

This study aims at two major focus points of concern. First of all, it analyzes presidential agenda of four regimes from Kim Young-sam, Kim Dae-jung, Roh Moo-hyun to Lee, Myung Bak, and their policy-making processes in order to realize the agenda. It involves how to select presidential agenda, whether order of priority is considered to select agenda, and which elements and reasons are considered in selecting agenda. The second focus of study lies in exploring into the relation between policy decision process and legalization of agenda. These days, we go through some changes which all kinds of political issues and media reports propose a wide variety of challenging tasks in setting agenda. Studies on setting presidential agenda has evaluated that the president has had greater influences upon agenda of national assembly and the press. When the president gives organized concern to the pending issues and set policy priorities on them, the chances become higher that the presidential agenda would be realized with success. 본 연구는 두 가지 초점을 가지고 연구를 하고자 한다. 우선, 민주화 이후 김영삼-김대중-노무현-이명박 네 개 정권의 국정 어젠다와 이를 실현하기 위한 정책화 과정을 분석하고자 했다. 국정 어젠다를 어떻게 선택하는지 어젠다 선택의 우선 순위를 가지고 있는지 정책 어젠다를 선택하는 요소와 이유 등에 대해 살펴보고자 했다. 두 번째 연구 초점은 어젠다의 정책결정과정과 입법화 관계를 살펴보는데 있다. 어젠다 설정에서 언론보도와 각종 정치적 이슈는 과거 모델에 대해 다양한 도전적 과제를 제시하는 시대적 변화를 겪고 있다. 대통령의 어젠다 설정에 관한 연구를 볼 때 대통령은 언론과 의회의 어젠다에 더 큰 영향력을 행사하고 있다고 평가하고 있다. 현안에 대한 체계적인 관심이 기울여지고 대통령이 그 현안에 대해 정책 우선 순위를 두게 되면, 대통령의 국정 어젠다 형성과정에서 성공할 가능성이 커지게 된다.

북핵 위기 20년

차재훈(Jaehoon Cha) 한국국제정치학회 2011 한국국제정치학회 기타간행물 Vol.2011 No.6

한-미 정부의 대북인식과 핵정책 상관성연구

차재훈(Cha, Jaehoon) 한국정치정보학회 2014 정치정보연구 Vol.17 No.2

북핵 해결과 관련한 지난 20년 동안의 미국과 한국의 강온 정책은 모두 실패해왔다. 북핵문제와 같이 단일한 협상문제를 20년 이상 지속적으로 끌고 오는 사례는 국제 분쟁 및 협상사례에서 쉽게 예를 찾지 못한다. 북핵문제는 어느 특정 국가의 일방적인 정책으로는 쉽게 해결할 수 없는 복잡한 구조를 가지고 변화하고 있지만 구체적 전략운용과 복합적 협력구조를 제대로 형성하지 못했기 때문이다. 북핵문제는 기본적으로 한미관계, 북미관계와 같은 양자협상과 6자회담과 같은 다자협상의 협상틀로 진행되어 왔다. 남북관계와 북미관계는 서로 상호적이고 북핵문제 해결은 한미동맹과 북한이라는 다자적 관점을 내포하고 있어서 문제해결이 쉽지 않다. 이러한 관점에 기반 해 본 연구에서는 북핵문제와 관련한 시대별 구조적 문제와 쟁점에 따른 한미 정부의 인식의 차이를 분석하고 효율적 대북핵정책 요건을 검토하고자 했다. It has been failed to reach the finalized political solution against North Korea’s nuclear issue by The United States and South Korea"s administration for nearly 20 years. This is a peculiar case that has never reached any solution among international negotiation cases. They failed to formulate a concrete strategy management and complex cooperative structure even though the nuclear issue around North Korea can never be solved by a one-sided approach. Nevertheless the attempts toward managing the nuclear issue around North Korea has basically proceeded only with the bilateral framework such as the Seoul-Washington alliance, the U.S-North Korea relations, and multilateral frameworks like the six-party nuclear talks. It has inevitably been related to multi or tripartite relations between the U.S., South Korea, and North Korea since the relationship between the U.S. and South Korea is interactive with the relationship between the U.S and North Korea. Through this point of view, this research will point out political and strategy problems and suggest a more detailed strategy management by exploring the perception gap of the U.S, and South Korea administrations and the correlations between this gap and actual policies regarding to the nuclear issue that have been made depending upon the then structural problems and issues.

배달종사자 대상 안전교육이 사고 예방에 미치는 영향 요인에 관한 연구

김정흔,정명진,임윤정,차재훈,최우정,Kim, Jeongheun,Jeong, Myeongjin,Yim, Yunjeong,Cha, Jaehoon,Choi, Woojung 국제문화기술진흥원 2022 The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technolo Vol.8 No.6

As the delivery service market continued to increase, the number of delivery workers also increased, but the corresponding safety education is insufficient. Therefore, this study is going to explore the importance of safety education by grasping the relationship between safety awareness, accident experience, and safety behavior of delivery workers. With the help of the delivery workers' online community site, this study conducted a survey on the status of delivery workers' safety education for a total of 114 delivery workers. As a result of the association analysis, more than half of the general agency workers said they did not receive safety training, and delivery workers who completed safety training were 2.36 times more frequent than delivery workers who did not complete safety training. In addition, through correlation analysis and simple regression analysis, safety education had a positive effect on safety perception of delivery workers, and there was a significant correlation between safety perception and safety behavior. Through these, the relationship between safety education and safety awareness, safety behavior, and the number of accident experiences was noticed, and it was concluded that safety education should be mandatory on all delivery platforms to prevent accidents.

중개(Mediation) 전략의 구조와 영향요소 분석 : 6자회담에 대한 정책적 시사를 중심으로

차재훈 한국협상학회 2003 협상연구 Vol.9 No.2

이 논문은 북한 핵문제 해결과 관련한 6자 회담에서의 중개전략의 구조와 영향요소에 대해서 연구한 것이다. 본 연구에서는 먼저 중개역할을 담당할 국가의 행위전략 모형을 설정하고 중개전략에 영향을 미치는 변수를 분석하고자 했다. 그리고, 효과적인 중개를 방해하는 문제점들을 분석하여 중개모형에 대한 이론개발이나 모델연구에 기여하는 측면을 발견할 수 있었다. 이러한 연구의 결과로 3자 개입의 한 유형인 중개모형에 대한 이론적 연구를 통해 북핵문제로 진행되고 있는 6자회담에 대한 다자협상 전력에 정책적 시사를 얻고자 하였다. 본 연구의 주제가 현재 진행되는 사안이며 관련국의 입장정리가 시작단계에 있기 때문에 향후 본격적인 6자회담 진행으로 경험적 자료를 제공할 것을 기대한다. The long-waited six-way talks over how to end the standoff over North Korea's nuclear weapons development program open last August in Beijing for three-days. Prospects for the multilateral negotiations are, however, not that bright at the moment due to the differing interests of the participating countries _ North Korea, the United States, China, South Korea, Japan and Russia. The six countries will finally sit together to discuss the North Korean nuclear issue after 10 months since it surged onto the major international agenda after Pyongyang admitted its program to develop enriched uranium. No doubt, the progress for negotiations to defuse the nuclear crisis has been too slow in light of the seriousness of the issue and expectations to hastily produce tangible results at the Beijing conference. The three-day talks will be an opportunity for the negotiators to listen to each one another's opinions. North Korea, who is undeniably responsible for drawing out international concerns, claims that the outcome of the six-way talks completely depends on the attitude of the U.S., namely whether or not Washington will abandon its hostility toward Pyongyang. Yet, the North stubbornly holds fast to its earlier stance that the U.S. should sign a non-aggression treaty with it. For its own part, the U.S. has indicated it may establish diplomatic ties with North Korea, if the latter scraps the nuclear program, although the non-aggression treaty is out of the question. The North should convince its dialogue partners that it has a will toward successful negotiations by presenting rational ideas on how to end its nuclear program peacefully. Newcomer to the talks, Japan, needs to show a forward-looking attitude, lest the kidnapping issue jeopardize the talks, which have been arranged after much difficulty. All the parties to the talks should make joint efforts to help create a positive atmosphere for the success of the meeting. In particular, the North Korean leadership should know exactly that the Beijing talks could be not only the first but last chance for the reclusive country to receive help for its survival from South Korea and the international community. Nuclear weapons cannot sustain the North Korean regime. There are a number of ways of dealing with or managing conflict. These may range from avoidance and withdrawal, through bilateral negotiation, to various forms of third-party intervention. Third-party intervention in conflict, particulary of the nonvinding noncoercive kind, is in many ways. It has played as important role in stalemate like NK nuclear issues. Unresolved problems and stalemates create the conditions for third-party intervention of one form or another. The Basic question we wish to address concerns the kinds of mediation cases that are successful even it comes to a deadlock. Which contextual attributes of factors explain successful mediation? Can such attributes of factors be used as information inputs by decisionmakers in determining whether or not to initiate mediation? I would like to suggest the these questions and others are best answered within the conceptual framework presented.