http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
전희숙(Hee-Suk Jeon),신명선(Myung-Sun Shin),권대도(Dae-Do Kwon) 한국언어치료학회 2002 言語治療硏究 Vol.11 No.2
The purpose of the study was to investigate the development of lateral sound [l] and flap sound [] in the normal children aged from 3 to 5 year. The speech were sampled from imitation utterance of nonsense syllable involved [l] and []. The articulation performance of the subjects were analyzed in consonant accuracy as a phonemic situation of [l] and []. The results of study were as follows;1. The consonant accuracy of lateral sound [l] reflected in vowel situation appeared 85% in 3;0~5;11. The accuracy orders of [l] were /o/(96.67%), /u/(96.11%), //(95.56%), /a/(93.89%), /i/(89.44%), /e/(84.44%). 2.. The accuracy orders of [] between vowels were /u/(78.33%), /a/(76.67%), //(73.33%), /o/(56.67%), /e/(46.67%), /i/(45.00%). The accuracy orders of [] before semi-vowel were /a/(56.67%), //(45.00%), /o/(40.00%), /u/(35.00%). 3. The accuracy of lateral sound [l] was much higher than flap sound []. The accuracy of lateral sound [l] were 95.83% after lateral sound, 94.17% in final consonant position, 88.33% before consonant. The accuracy of flap sound [] were 62.77% between vowels, 44.17% before semi-vowel. It was assumed Korean consonant /ㄹ/ development is influenced phonemic situation described just before.
청자의 재요구에 대한 정상아동과 언어장애아동의 반응비교 연구
신명선(Myung-Sun Shin),안종복(Jong-Bok Ahn),전희숙(Hee-Suk Jeon),권도하(Do-Ha Kwon) 한국언어치료학회 2002 言語治療硏究 Vol.11 No.2
This study compared the conversational repair strategies employed by 4 language-impaired children(LI, mean chronological age 7;1years) and their linguistically normal chronological age matched(CA) peers and their language age matched(LA) peers in response to a stacked series of requests of clarification. A 30-minute language sample was elicited by an adult examiner from each of the subjects. Each sequence consisted of three different neutral requests for clarification(Huh?, What?, and I didn't understand that?.) and the subject's response to each request. The result of the present study were as follows: (1) LA group produced so much repetition of response to requests for clarification. (2) CA group altered sentence structure, form, context with cue, revision, addition as well as repetition. (3) Repetition of responses categories was statistically significant changes in LI group, CA group. (4) Suprasegmental category was statistically significant changes in LI group, CA group. The results of this study suggest that language impairment is reflected interactional difficulties such as those noted here may result from a speaker's adjustment to his/her deficit as well as from difficulties in language form and content. The results also will be very useful in therapeutic planning and on the effect of communication therapy in language impaired children.