http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : 양홍식 (검색결과 2 건)
-
양홍식 대구대학교 특수교육대학원 2005 국내석사
This study is to research high school students' attitude towards children with disabilities. This study looks at whether high school students have volunteer experience or not with disabled children, and it tests the hypothesis that volunteer activities with the disabled will give positive attitude toward the disabled. A questionnaire was given to 240 students in 4 normal high school of G-Eup, Gyeongnam. Students were divided in to two groups by gender and grade level. 50% of students in those groups had previous volunteer experience, and 50% of students had no previous volunteer experience with disabled children. The questionnaire asked students 4 questions: students' general attitude towards disabled people, students' attitude toward effectiveness of volunteer work, students' attitude toward integrated education, and students' attitude toward volunteer work. The items in the questionnaire were taken from Likert's five-point scales. "Two-Way ANOVA" was conducted to analyze the opinions of the students. The results are as follows: First, attitude toward the disabled by normal high school students with volunteer experience is more positive and open. Girls' attitude toward the disabled is better and more positive than that of boys. Students who have volunteer experience and a positive attitude toward the disabled gain better insight into their own self-awareness and self-confidence. Second, among the students with volunteer experience with the disabled, the attitude of the seniors is more positive and open than that of the sophomores. The correlation between attitude toward the disabled volunteer experience and grade level shows a statistically significant result. Older students who have volunteer experience with the disabled show more positive attitudes towards the disabled. From the results of this study, I'd like to suggest the following: First, nationwide research about high school students' volunteer work with the disabled is needed. This study was only done with normal high school students in G-Eup, Gyeongnam. Second, in order to prepare more desirable integrated education, more programs and education need to be activated for high school students to experience volunteer work with the disable. Programs and education that give high school students experience working with the disabled can help to influence high school students' attitudes toward the disabled.
-
상담 분야의 근거이론 연구 동향분석 : 국내·외 학술지 논문을 중심으로(2000~2015)
양홍식 한국상담대학원대학교 2017 국내석사
본 연구는 최근 꾸준히 증가하고 있는 상담 분야 근거이론 연구를 검토하여 상담연구에서 근거이론이 현재 어떤 흐름인지 이해하고 앞으로 상담 분야에서 근거이론의 방향성을 제안하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 2000년∼2015년 국내외 상담 분야 학술지(상담 및 심리치료, 상담학연구, JCD, JCP, TCP)에 게재된 총 102편의 논문을 대상으로 논문출처, 연구주제, 연구대상, 참여자 수, 자료수집방법, 인터뷰시간, 연구타당성 검증기준, 자료분석방식을 분석하였다. 본 연구의 분석결과를 요약하면 다음과 같다. 첫째, 연도별 동향으로는 연도에 따라 국내는 2013년 이후, 국외는 2012년 이후 지속적으로 증가하는 추세를 보이고 있다. 학술지별로는 국내에서는 상담학연구가 41편(70.7%) 국외는 JCP가 18편(40.9%)으로 가장 많았다. 둘째, 연구주제로는 성격특성 및 적응(국내 30편 50.8%, 국외 25편 56.5%)과 상담자 특성, 훈련 및 수퍼비전(국내 12편 22%, 국외 9편 20.5%)이 가장 많았다. 셋째, 연구대상은 국내·외 모두 상담자(국내 15편 25.9%, 국외 10편 22.7%)가 가장 많은 비중을 차지했다. 연구방법 세부사항을 살펴보면, 참여자수는 국내 ‘7∼9명’(17편 29.3%), 국외 ‘17∼20명’(12편 27.3%)으로, 자료수집방법은 국내·외 모두 심층면접(국내 44편 75.9%, 국외 34편 77.4%)이, 인터뷰시간은 국내 ‘60∼90분’(20편 34.5%), 국외 ‘90∼150분’(20편 45.5%)이 가장 많은 것으로 나타났다. 연구타당성평가 검증기준은 전문가 집단의 합의 및 검토(국내 51편 87.9%, 국외 39편 88.6%)가 가장 많았으며, 자료분석방식으로는 Strauss & Corbin 접근방식(국내 56편 96.6%, 국외 20편 45.5%)이 가장 사용빈도가 높았다. 분석 결과를 토대로 상담 분야 근거이론 연구의 동향에 대해 논의하였으며, 앞으로 상담 분야에서 근거이론 연구의 방향을 제시하였다. 본 연구는 국내에서 처음으로 이루어진 근거이론 동향분석이며, 국내·외를 비교하여 분석하였다는 점에서 의의가 있다. The purpose of this study is to suggest future direction of grounded theory on counseling field with understanding of the current trend by examining the ever-growing studies. This study analyzed 102 articles, published in The Korean Journal of Counseling (KJC), The Korean Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy (KJCP), Journal of Counseling and Development (JCD), Journal of Counseling Psychology (JCP), The Counseling Psychologist (TCP) for a 16-year period(2000∼2015), for 7 substantive content categories. The summary of the analysis result is as follows. First, both of Korean and U.S counseling studies based on the grounded theory are on a rising trend since 2013. Especially, KJC(41 articles, 70.7%) and JCP(18 articles, 40.9%) had the highest number of articles respectively. Secondly, ‘Personality characteristics and adaptation’(30 Korean articles, 50.8%, 25 U.S articles, 56.5%) and ‘Counselor characteristics, training, and supervision’(12 Korean articles, 22%, 9 U.S articles, 20.5%) were the most studied research subjects. Thirdly, study shows that both of Korean and U.S study researched about ‘Counselor’(15 Korean articles, 25.9%, 10 U.S articles, 22.7%) the most as an object of study. To review the detail of methods, both of Korean and U.S study chose ‘In-depth interview’ most frequently(44 Korean articles, 75.9%, 34 U.S articles, 77.4%) as their method of data collection. On the other hand, study also shows that Korean study chose ‘7 to 9’(17 articles, 29.3%) number of participant and took ‘60 to 90 min’(20 articles, 34.5%) interview time most often, while U.S study did with ‘17 to 20’(12 articles, 27.3%) for ‘90 to 150 min’(20 articles, 45.5%). ‘Review and Agreement by expert group’(51 Korean articles, 87.9%, 39 U.S articles, 88.6%) was the most favored standard of the propriety evaluation research and ‘Strauss & Corbin style’(56 Korean articles, 96.6%, 20 U.S articles, 45.5%) was the most frequently used method of approach in both studies. Based on the analysis results and discussion, this study suggests the direction of grounded theory for consulting field. This article is significant in the sense that it is the nation’s first trend analysis of grounded theory and analyzes both Korean and U.S trend.
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
