RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재

        계약구속력의 근거에 관한 새로운 이론모델

        변용완(Yong Wan Byun) 중앙법학회 2014 中央法學 Vol.16 No.2

        The classical ideal of free contract depended upon an abstract, and obviously unrealistic, model of contract formation. According to that model, only a voluntary exchange of promises (the traditional offer and acceptance) gave rise to contractual obligations. At the moment of exchange (and not a second sooner), a right of expectation sprang into being. The right was violated if either party failed to perform according to the agreed-upon terms. This was, of course, precisely the model so critical to classical American legal thought: Unless judges could claim to be enforcing the will of the parties, they could be accused of arbitrarily and retroactively creating new legal obligations, an obvious invasion of the defendant`s sphere of legally protected autonomy. Conversely, a judge`s failure fully to compensate contractual breach would constitute a refusal. equally arbitrary and irresponsible to protect the plaintiff`s right of expectation. a right necessarily deemed no less "real" than the rights defining each party`s initial sphere of individual freedom. Reliance Theories that explain contractual obligation as an effort to protect a promisee`s reliance on the promises of others have the apparent virtue of explaining why persons may be bound by the common meaning of their words regardless of their intentions. Thus, it has become increasingly fashionable to assert that contractual obligation is created by reliance on a promise. Relational contract theory has helped to bring home two of the fundamental weaknesses of classical contract law. its static character, and the flawed nature of its implicit empirical premise that most contracts are discrete. Relational contract theory has also greatly illuminated the economics and sociology of contracting. Finally, relational contract theory has excelled in its treatment of specific types of contracts, like franchise agreements, and specific types of express or implied terms, like best-efforts provisions. As a result of all these contributions, relational contract theory has been a highly important factor in the formulation of modern contract law. I believe, however, that a version of relational contract theory can have real influence as a counterweight to the still-powerful discrete, maximizing tendencies of neoclassical contract law. If we think of doctrine as a structure of argument rather than a set of rules, then it becomes clear that neoclassical contract and relational contract generate competing general accounts of the sources and nature of obligation in contract law.

      • KCI등재

        지능형교통시스템과 민사법적 과제

        변용완(Yong Wan Byun) 중앙법학회 2015 中央法學 Vol.17 No.3

        As Intelligent Transportation Systems (“ITS”) incorporate data-gathering and compiling systems into the transportation infrastructure, new privacy implications stemming from the potential misallocation or abuse of collected data have been created. The types of vehicle information collected by ITS technologies include trip routes, frequency of use and compliance with traffic laws. As new technologies continue to improve traffic flow and safety, they also require increasingly enhanced abilities to capture and utilize data. Yet, this capability to gather, store, and transmit data about a transportation network user carries implications for the privacy of vehicle owners, drivers, and potentially passengers. Questions of how the technologies interact with public perceptions and expectations of privacy, as well as the current legal framework established to protect privacy, are important to determining the ways in which ITS will be allowed to operate in the future. By taking into account the legal principles governing information practices. Also important for the future of ITS, this academic trend rejects the legal equivalency of unaided visual observation, technology-assisted observation, and technology-enabled recording. This train of thought calls this element of the historic legal paradigm erroneous for reasons including the difference in the duration of the privacy violation, the degree of scrutiny to which a person is subjected, and the number of people who may infringe on the victim``s privacywhentechnologyisincorporated. Just as the new technology of computers required extension of an existing legal framework to accommodate the new reality, so too will ITS require extension of existing legal concepts.

      • KCI등재
      • 데이터마이닝과 RSM 혼합모델을 이용한 스마트폰카메라부품 공정 개선

        양재경(Jaekyung Yang),천강민(Kang-min Cheon),변용완(Yong-Wan Byun) 한국산학기술학회 2015 한국산학기술학회 학술대회 Vol.2015 No.1

        본 논문은 스마트폰 카메라 바디 제조 빅데이터 분석의 정확성을 높이고자 제조 공정 개선에 이용할 수 있는 데이터마이닝과 RSM(Response surface methodology) 혼합 모델을 제안하고 있다. 정밀 사출성형기로부터 수집된 제조 빅데이터는 혼합모델의 입력으로 이용되었으며, 생산된 제품의 품질 결과를 보여주는 제품 치수 데이터는 혼합 모델의 품질 결과로 사용하였다. 데이터 전처리 단계를 거쳐 속성선택을 통해 선정된 품질에 영향을 미치는 변수를 최종적으로 선정한 후 데이터마이닝 학습 알고리즘을 제품 품질에 영향을 평가할 수 있는 학습모델을 최종적으로 도출하였다. 여기서 데이터마이닝 학습모델 결과에서 나타난 품질 특성 변수 및 관계를 적용하여 RSM 인자를 약 1/8로 줄였으며 최종 실험의 횟수를 최초 실험에 비하여 약 1/12로 줄였다. 최종적으로 도출된 RSM 모델을 통해 양품 기준 제품 치수를 만족하는 최적 생산 조건의 공정변수 특성치를 제시하였다.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼