http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
‘통섭(Consilience)’의 학문적 성격과 체육학적 의의
김영녀(Kim, Young-Nyeo),김영구(Kim, Young-Ku),오현택(Oh, Hyun-Taek) 한국체육과학회 2012 한국체육과학회지 Vol.21 No.2
The purpose of this study was to consider the academic characteristics of "Consilience" and examine its applicability to integration of sport science. Dispute between segmentation and integration of sport science was behind the rise of Consilience in sport science. The theory of Consilience was a product of reductionism by examination a critical review the concept of Consilience in the academic world, and therefore the concept of Consilience that had been in common use in sport science was used for a wrong purpose. Based on the above discussion, it was expected that the Consilience of sport science would have a lot controversial points both sides of theory and practice. Consilience had a theoretical defect that didn"t acknowledge the differences in basic hypothesis through making knowledge between disciplines. In practical side of sport science, there was a grade of ranks between disciplines that interfered with the equal interchange and integration of sport science, interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary studies in sport science for the foundation of Consilience were rare, and interdisciplinary research system itself had a lot of difficulties to put in practice. The matters claiming prior settlement for serious discussion about Consilience in sport science as follows: first, the comprehensive and systematic plan for Consilience would be necessary, second, the philosophical foundation for the necessity of academical integration would be prepared, third, journals and academic council would be extended for interdisciplinary research, and forth, the balanced development of all disciplines in sport science would be pursed for long-term development of interdisciplinary research.