http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : ( John Beverley ) (검색결과 3 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
On the Postcolonial Turn in Latin American Criticism (apropos El Inca Garcilaso)
( John Beverley ) 고려대학교 스페인·라틴아메리카연구소 2014 스페인라틴아메리카연구 Vol.7 No.1
This article is located in the debates which have marked Latinamericanist theory and criticism in the last quarter century or so. It explores the problems of using the figure of El Inca Garcilaso as symbolic in some way of the emergence of a collective Lain American identity. The first part centers on a critique of some of the limitations of postcolonial theory in this regard, particularly Walter Mignolo`s influential idea of the colonial Baroque as an expression of the “creole wound.” The article suggests that the appropriation of El Inca Garcilaso (as a positive or negative paradigm) is somewhat ahistorical, that it would be more accurate to think of the Latin American 17th century as involving something more like a “creole interregnum,” with its own peculiar forms of hegemony. The second part looks, by contrast, at the concrete historical appropriation of the figure of El Inca by Tupac Amaru II (Jose Gabriel Condorcanqui) in the great rebellion he led in Alto Peru in 1780-82, which suggests the lines of an alternative, egalitarian modernity for Latin America.
-
El latinoamericanismo después de “ 9/11”
John Beverley(존 베벌리) 한국라틴아메리카학회 2005 라틴아메리카연구 Vol.18 No.2
In his well-known essay on “the clash of civilizations,” Samuel Huntington characterized Latin American states as “torn countries,” split between the desire for progressive integration with North America, or the prospect of developing themselves as a separate “civilization” with its own identity, values, and projects, in competition with US hegemony. This is an old question in US/Latin American relations, but also a new one, that has to do with the cultural identity of both the United States and Latin America in the new century, under conditions of globalization. The paper argues that the immediate future will involve an increasing affirmation of Latin America against US hegemony at all levels -economic, cultural, perhaps even military. That affirmation will require in turn a redefinition of Latin America as a “civilization.” But is not the discourse of “civilization” itself, founded in Latin America on an “Arielist” conception of Latin American alterity as aesthetic difference, precisely what recent developments in social and cultural theory(postcolonial and subaltern studies, feminism, cultural studies, concepts of multiculturalism/“interculturalidad”) put into question. The paper argues, nevertheless, that it is in relation to the task of reimagining Latin America in the coming century that there is an unexpected and unexpectedly productive link between an emerging Latin American geopolitical thinking and the new perspectives social and cultural theory.
-
El evento del latinoamericanismo: un mapa político-conceptual
John Beverley 서울대학교 라틴아메리카연구소 2009 이베로아메리카硏究 Vol.20 No.2
El latinoamericanismo se entiende aquí como el discurso teórico-crítico de la academia sobre Latinoamérica. El ensayo ofrece un “mapa cognitivo” del latinoamericanismo en varias de sus manifestaciones más importantes en el período —o interregno— que va desde el brote radical de los ‘60 y su coincidencia con el auge de la teoría estructuralista y posestructuralista a la situación actual representada por los gobiernos de la llamada “marea rosada”. Su problemática central es la relación entre la teoría y crítica cultural y la articulación de formas políticas concretas. Se divide en seis partes: 1) el advenimiento de la “teoría”; 2) los estudios subalternos; 3) el testimonio; 4) el auge y ocaso de los estudios culturales; 5) el giro neoconservador; y 6) el latinoamericanismo y la cuestión del Estado.
KCI
KISS연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
