RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재

        朝鮮朝中期的陽明學批判: 以退溪、西崖、栗谷爲中心

        리학당 ( Xue-tang Li ) 한국실학학회 2016 한국실학연구 Vol.0 No.31

        在朝鮮朝中期, 經過退栗爲代表的性理學者的學術努力, 程朱理學及其文化認知已經以某種方式和途徑進入了社會成員的文化心理結構當中, 形成某種特定的認知圖式, 産生了文化上的繼承和同化過程。 而這種文化心理又反過來影響了朝鮮朝對陽明心學的的群體認知, 形成了阻碍吸收和适應新學術思想的環境背景, 從而影響整個社會成員的文化思維方式、傳統及价値觀等。 出于確立和維護本國正統道學的需要, 以晦齋李彦迪和退溪李滉爲代表的朝鮮道學者們一方面從學理上積極硏究程朱理學理論, 探討幷選擇性地繼承其心性理氣的性理學觀念, 從而從朝鮮性理學內部形成了一整套槪念系統和价値伸張體系。 這就可以解釋爲什마朝鮮朝中期陽明心學受到頑强抵制, 未能在這塊儒家思想成爲精神文化支柱的異國土地上開花結果的原因。 盡管如此, 通過本論文的硏究也表明, 在朝鮮朝中期, 對陽明心學的認識幷非全然罵倒, 也有部分學者從學理上對陽明心學做了細致硏究。 退溪學派出于硏究陽明學的需要, 內部廣泛傳抄了《傳習錄》和《困知記》;西厓柳成龍最早接觸了《傳習錄》等陽明學著作, 栗谷李珥爲明人陳建的《學부通辨》作跋, 這說明從16世紀上半葉開始陽明學在朝鮮學界已經廣泛傳播幷産生了相當的影響。 西厓所主張的王學創立是爲了糾朱學末學之偏的觀点代表了當時朝鮮學界的部分視角, 表明朝鮮學界已經對陽明心學的歷史意義有了一定認識。 In Mid Joseon dynasty, by academic endeavor of scholars, represented by Toegea and Yulgok from Korean rational Confucianism, the Neo-Confucianism and its cultural psychology of Joseon community members in some ways, formed a specific cognitive schema with cultural inheritance and process of assimilation, which influenced the group cognition on School of Wang Yang-ming in Joseon dynasty, thereby hindered them to absord and abapt new academic thinking and affected their mode of thinking, tradition and values. In order to establish and preserve the native orthodox neo-Confucianism, scholars of Joseon dynasty, represented by Hoejae and Toegea, researched on the theory of neo-Confucianism while inherited its concept of heart and nature, thus formed a whole set of conceptual system and value system inside of Korean rational Confucianism. That``s why the School of Wang Yang-ming was resisted in mid Joseon dynasty and failed in adopting by this country, which taking Confucianism as its moral support. Even so, this paper indicates that not all of the scholars opposed the school at that time. There are some scholars did intensive study on school of Wang Yang-ming. Out of necessity, school of Toegea made private copies of 《Chuan Xi Lu(傳習錄)》and 《Kun Zhi Ji(困知記)》 internally. Soae was the first Joseon scholar who read the works such as 《Chuan Xi Lu(傳習錄)》. Yulgok wrote a postscript for Chen Jian``s 《Xue Fu Tong Bian(學부通辨)》. This shows that from the first half of 16th century, the school of Wang Yan-gming has been widely spread in Joseon academic circles and got an important effect. The establishment of School of Mind advocated by Soae was to correct the error of neo-Confucianism, which represents some viewpoints of Joseon academic circles. That means they had a certain cogitation on historical significance of Yangming Idealistic School.

      • KCI등재

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼