http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
「農業危機」認識의 土地制度史的 接近 : 「土地調査事業」과「農民改革」의 性格分析을 中心으로
兪仁浩 韓國農業政策學會 1976 농업경영정책연구 Vol.3 No.1
오늘 우리나라 농업이 ‘위기’에 처해 있음은 여러 방면에서 인식되고 있다. 가령 총 농가의 33.5%가 소작농으로 집계되고 있는 1970년의 ‘농업센서스’에서 볼 수 있고, 국내 총 식량수요의 31.8%(1974년) 가 외국으로부터의 유입에 의하여 충당되고 있다는 점에서 볼 수 있고, 그러고 농민들의 경제활동을 집약적으로 표현해 주는 ‘농가부채’가 크게 증가 되고 있다.(74년은 71년의 2.5배)는 사실에서 볼 수 있다. 더욱이 농업부문에서 인식되는 여러 방면의 위기현상은 그것이 더욱 더 심화되고 있음을 시계열적으로 확인할 수 있다. 한편 농업부문에서 전개되고 있는 여러 국면의 위기현상의 심화과정이 비농업부문의 급속한 확대과정과 결코 무관한 것이 아니라고 할 때, 비농업부문의 급속한 확대가 과연 우리나라 경제의 자립화 내지 자주화를 이룩할 수 있을 것인가에 대하여 마저 재검토를 요구하게 되는 측면이기도 하다. 농업위기는 여러 면에서 볼 수 있으니 그것의 기본적 국면은 농지제도면에서 파악하여야 한다는 것, 농업위기를 농지제도면에서 파악하기 위해서는 현행 농지제도의 토지제도사적 의의를 밝히지 않으면 안된다는 것, 농업위기의 극복논리로서 제시되고 있는 많은 방안이 성과적인 결과를 맺지 못하거나 또는 한정적인 설득력밖에 가지지 못하는 것은, 거기에 있어서는 농업위기의 기본적 국면을 잘못 인식하였거나 혹은 농지제도면에서 인식하였다 하더라도 그것의 토지제도사적 의의를 올바르게 인식하지 못함으로써 ‘많은 방안’은 언제나 ‘시도’로서 끝맺을 수밖에 없다는 것, 이러한 관점에서 필자의 ‘농업위기’ 극복을 위한 논리는 제시되고 있다는 것을 우선 밝혀두기로 한다.
동유럽국가의 경제사정과 농업정책개혁방향 : 농지의 사유화 정책을 중심으로
김종무 한국농업정책학회, 한국축산경영학회 2000 농업경영정책연구 Vol.27 No.3
The economic development in the Central Eastern European countries is investigated in this paper with special reference to privatization of farm land in agricultural policy reform. Every country has some different kind of economic as well as agricultural development models, therefore it is a little hard to comment in general about CEE countries. There are state farms, cooperative farms and private farms in many CEE countries. At moment, there is no economic information on various forms of farms in CEE countries. This kind of information will be certainly necessary in future to estimate agricultural policy reform of land privatization. Key words : 경제발전(economic development), 농업정책(agricultural policy), 사유화(privatization)
관광객의 위험지각이 농촌관광지 방문 의도에 미치는 영향
최원실(Won Sil Choi),김현노(Hyun No Kim),김경량(Kyung Ryang Kim) 한국농업정책학회, 한국축산경영학회 2017 농업경영정책연구 Vol.44 No.2
As rural areas have been changing rapidly due to international trade liberalization, the importance of nonfarm income has been increasingly recognized for the sustainability of rural economy in Korea. In this context, the government has developed a rural tourism business in order to increase nonfarm income and consequently the demand for the rural tourism has been increased. However, inevitable incidents continue to occur in the tourist sites. Whenever these dangerous disasters happen, the tourists are aware of the potential risks and tend to avoid or cancel their plans to visit rural areas. In tourism sector, the perceived risk has been regarded as the important variable which can have an influence on individual’s preference or intention of revisiting. In this regard, it is necessary to examine the impact of the risk perception associated with disasters that occur persistently and inevitably in the rural tourism. Therefore, this study analyzes the impact of tourists’ risk perception on rural tourism using the survey data obtained from the potential rural tourists. Based on empirical findings, this study proposes a strategy and policy associated with a risk management, which can be useful for the revitalization of rural tourism.
이병기 한국농업정책학회, 한국축산경영학회 2000 농업경영정책연구 Vol.27 No.2
This article attempts to estimate the measures of the income inequality in the Korean rural area. Income inequalities are estimated using the raw data of the Report on the Farm Household Economy Survey for the years 1991∼1999. We find that the farm income declined dramatically, but the income inequality improved slightly in rural area after the Korean economic crisis. Results of decomposition of sources of income inequality suggests that the observed income inequality is due to such factors as farm size, age, education. It is desirable that income policies take account for sources of income inequality.
최찬호 한국농업정책학회, 한국축산경영학회 2000 농업경영정책연구 Vol.27 No.2
The Uruguay Round (UR) on Agriculture was initiated by a small number of exporting countries like the United States, European Union, and Cairns group who were motivated to transfer their internal problems in agriculture to international markets. Although they highlighted the theme of global agricultural reform by comparative advantage and welfare of the all participant, the Round was an unfair game of economic politics in the name of multilateral negotiation that could solve their accumulative problems of over-production, stockpiling, export dumping and increasing subsidies. In fact, the negotiation was prepared in advance by the policy reforms of the leading countries in a way to fit with their own needs and budget capabilities. As the result, the monopolistic power of those exporting countries has strengthened in the international market on the one hand; while deepening the disparities between the rich and poor and food security dependency of many importing countries on the other hand. Unfairness of the Agreement lies in the fact that; export- restrictions and embargos of exporting countries were allowed; but no exemption for importing countries other than admitting tariffication and minimum market access (MMA) in the rule of market access. This paper, in analyzing the nature of unfairness of the Agreement and the impact, on the basis of Korean experiences in order to provide information to those who are concerned in the agricultural arena of globalization.
김충실 한국농업정책학회, 한국축산경영학회 2000 농업경영정책연구 Vol.27 No.1
The purpose of this study is to suggest rational direction with basic requirements for developing a successful Direct Payment Program in farm sector from considering foreign and domestic cases of the Direct Payment as well as policy criteria in accordance with policy position of Korean agriculture simultaneously. In the basic requirements, there are some normative and realistic conditions and some policy technical conditions. The normative conditions emphasize the justice of income distribution for the poor farmers as well as the steady-state dynamics in farm policy system for agricultural macro-function in Korean economy. It is also one of the most important requirements to develop multi-objective policy decision making model for successful decision making to consider normative and realistic criteria, multi-policy goals, budget constraint and the order of policy priority simultaneously.