http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
Roundtable on Peter J. Katzenstein's Contributions to the Study of East Asian Regionalism
Peter J. Katzenstein,Vinod K. Aggarwal,Min Gyo Koo,Amitav Acharya,Richard Higgott,John Ravenhill 동아시아연구원 2007 Journal of East Asian Studies Vol.7 No.3
Over the past decade, Peter J. Katzenstein has made enormous contributions to our theoretical and empirical understanding of Asian economic and security regionalism, which has been manifested by the proliferation of intra- and extra-regional free trade agreements, regional financial institutions, and cooperative regional security dialogues. Katzensteins scholarly works on Asian regionalism and the changing role of Japan have set the pace for research in the field. In this article, a group of distinguished scholars in the field of Asian regionalismVinod K. Aggarwal, Min Gyo Koo, Amitave Acharya, Richard Higgott, and John Ravenhillcritically evaluate Katzensteins approach to the links among Japan, Asian regionalism, and global politics. In response, Katzenstein argues that Asian (and European) regionalism is linked to the American imperium and to core regional states and that regionalism is best studied with an eclectic approach. For him, regionalism is a force that defines security, economic, and cultural dimensions of world politics, thus bringing about a modicum of order therein.
Vinod K. Aggarwal,Jonathan T. Chow 연세대학교 사회과학연구소 2008 社會科學論集 Vol.39 No.2
Paper prepared for presentation at the Social Science Research Institute, Yonsei University. An earlier version of this paper was presented at the International Studies Association meeting in San Francisco, California, March 27, 2008. We would like to thank Kristi Govella, Ross Cheriton, Vaishnavi Jayakumar, and Anne Meng for research assistance and comments on this paper.
Sonia N. Aggarwal,Vinod K. Aggarwal 이화여자대학교 이화사회과학원 2015 사회과학연구논총 Vol.31 No.2
Almost all countries have faced protectionist pressures from their agricultural sector, particularly during trade negotiations. Korea is no exception. This article examines the strategy of competitive framing used by both the farm lobby and Korean government in the context of the Korea-US Free Trade (KORUS) negotiations. Farmers have framed their efforts by appealing to survival, cultural and health advocacy, and the need to resist foreign domination. In its own framing, the government has emphasized Korea’s global economic and security position. Although framing has been essential as strategies by both parties, the government has also overcome resistance by reorganizing the government to gain the upper hand in the bureaucracy and compensating farmers to allow negotiations to move forward.