http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : Takashi Shono (검색결과 2 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
Hirokazu Saito,Yoshihiro Kadono,Takashi Shono,Kentaro Kamikawa,Atsushi Urata,Jiro Nasu,Haruo Imamura,Ikuo Matsushita,Tatsuyuki Kakuma,Shuji Tada 대한소화기내시경학회 2022 Clinical Endoscopy Vol.55 No.2
Background/Aims: Difficult biliary cannulation is an important risk factor for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP). Therefore, this study aimed to identify the factors that predict difficult cannulation for common bile ductstones (CBDS) to reduce the risk for PEP. Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included 1,406 consecutive patients with native papillae who underwent ERCP forCBDS. Factors predicting difficult cannulation for CBDS were identified using univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: Univariate analysis showed that six factors significantly predicted difficult cannulation: ERCP performed by non-expertendoscopists, low-volume center, absence of acute cholangitis, normal serum bilirubin, intradiverticular papilla, and type of majorduodenal papilla. Multivariate analysis identified ERCP performed by non-expert endoscopists (odds ratio [OR], 2.5; p<0.001),low-volume center (OR, 1.6; p<0.001), intradiverticular papilla (OR, 1.3; p=0.007), normal serum bilirubin (OR, 1.3; p=0.038), andabsence of acute cholangitis (OR, 1.3; p=0.049) as factors significantly predicting difficult cannulation for CBDS. Conclusions: Initial cannulation by an experienced endoscopist, early rescue cannulation, or early takeover by an experiencedendoscopist should be considered when performing ERCP for CBDS in the presence of factors predicting difficult cannulation.
-
Wataru Nakanishi,Shigehito Miyagi,Kazuaki Tokodai,Atsushi Fujio,Kengo Sasaki,Yoshihiro Shono,Michiaki Unno,Takashi Kamei 대한외과학회 2020 Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research(ASRT) Vol.99 No.6
Purpose: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is beneficial to patients undergoing digestive surgery. However, its efficacy in patients undergoing open hepatectomy remains unclear. Methods: Consecutive patients scheduled for open hepatectomy were randomly assigned to undergo either ERAS or conventional postoperative management. The primary endpoint was the amount of time that elapsed before patients were considered medically fit for discharge (MFD) and length of hospital stay (LOHS). Secondary endpoints included morbidity, mortality, the time to first flatus, defecation, first walk, and freedom from infusion. Perioperative serum nutritional markers, insulin resistance, respiratory quotient (RQ), and resting energy expenditure (REE) were also assessed. Results: Between August 2014 and March 2017, 57 patients were randomized into 2 groups; ERAS group (n = 29) and conventional management (n = 28). The median MFD was not significantly different between the ERAS and conventional management groups (6.5 vs. 7 days; P = 0.381). Recovery from gastrointestinal paresis was significantly quicker in the ERAS group (1.8 vs. 2.4 days; P = 0.004). There were no significant differences in serum markers, insulin resistance, RQ, and REE. Conclusion: This trial did not demonstrate greater efficacy of the ERAS protocol following open hepatectomy in terms of the MFD and LOHS. However, the ERAS protocol was associated with better recovery from postoperative gastrointestinal paresis, suggesting that it is useful for patients undergoing open hepatectomy
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
