http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
On the Heterogeneous Postal Delivery Model for Multicasting
Sekharan, Chandra N.,Banik, Shankar M.,Radhakrishnan, Sridhar The Korea Institute of Information and Commucation 2011 Journal of communications and networks Vol.13 No.5
The heterogeneous postal delivery model assumes that each intermediate node in the multicasting tree incurs a constant switching time for each message that is sent. We have proposed a new model where we assume a more generalized switching time at intermediate nodes. In our model, a child node v of a parent u has a switching delay vector, where the ith element of the vector indicates the switching delay incurred by u for sending the message to v after sending the message to i-1 other children of u. Given a multicast tree and switching delay vectors at each non-root node 5 in the tree, we provide an O(n$^{\frac{5}{2}}$) optimal algorithm that will decide the order in which the internal (non-leaf) nodes have to send the multicast message to its children in order to minimize the maximum end-to-end delay due to multicasting. We also show an important lower bound result that optimal multicast switching delay problem is as hard as min-max matching problem on weighted bipartite graphs and hence O(n$^{\frac{5}{2}}$) running time is tight.
On the Heterogeneous Postal Delivery Model for Multicasting
Chandra N. Sekharan,Shankar M. Banik,Sridhar Radhakrishnan 한국통신학회 2011 Journal of communications and networks Vol.13 No.5
The heterogeneous postal delivery model assumes that each intermediate node in the multicasting tree incurs a constant switching time for each message that is sent. We have proposed a new model where we assume a more generalized switching time at intermediate nodes. In our model, a child node v of a parent u has a switching delay vector, where the ith element of the vector indicates the switching delay incurred by u for sending the message to v after sending the message to i − 1 other children of u. Given a multicast tree and switching delay vectors at each non-root node in the tree, we provide an O(n 52 ) optimal algorithm that will decide the order in which the internal (non-leaf) nodes have to send the multicast message to its children in order to minimize the maximum end-to-end delay due to multicasting. We also show an important lower bound result that optimal multicast switching delay problem is as hard as min-max matching problem on weighted bipartite graphs and hence O(n 52 ) running time is tight.
Fully Automated Transcranial Doppler Ultrasound for Middle Cerebral Artery Insonation
Michael J. O’Brien,Amber Y. Dorn,Mina Ranjbaran,Zhaojun Nie,Mateo Scheidt,Nasim Mirnateghi,Shankar Radhakrishnan,Robert B. Hamilton 대한신경초음파학회 2022 대한신경초음파학회지 (JNN) Vol.14 No.1
Background: Transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD) is utilized in the assessment of neurological conditions in clinical environments such as the intensive care unit and emergency department. However, obstacles for widespread use of TCD include a lack of trained registered vascular technologists (RVT) and operator variability. We present a study comparing RVT and a fully automated robotic TCD system (NovaGuide rTCD) for insonation of the middle cerebral artery (MCA). Methods: A trained RVT and rTCD sequentially collected bilateral MCA cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV) from 86 healthy subjects. Mean CBFV (mCBFV) and the signal quality assessment (SQA) acquired manually by RVT and autonomously via rTCD were compared. Comparison metrics evaluated include mean accuracy ratio (MAR), and Bland-Altman mean-difference (MD) between rTCD and RVT with paired t-Test for significance. Bootstrapping was used in the accuracy ratio and mean-time to best signal computations to establish 95% confidence intervals. Results: The mCBFVs and SQAs found by rTCD compared to RVT had MAR of 99.7% (97.7-101.7%) and 102.7% (101.1-104.8%), respectively. The rTCD mean-time to best-quality signal was 0.87 min (0.71-1.05) (RVT was not timed). The mean-difference scores for mCBFV and SQA were MD=-0.43cm/s (p=0.053) and MD=-0.36 (p=0.61), respectively. The rTCD had a 3.5% no-window failure rate compared to RVT no-window rate of 4.1%. Conclusion: Comparison of bilateral TCD signals collected by rTCD and RVT demonstrated equivalence in mCBFV and signal quality, suggesting rTCD’s potential to expand utility of TCD in clinical settings that are resource-limited.