RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제
      • 좁혀본 항목 보기순서

        • 원문유무
        • 등재정보
        • 학술지명
        • 주제분류
        • 발행연도
        • 작성언어
        • 저자
          펼치기

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재

        Impact of COVID-19 in gynecologic oncology: a Nationwide Italian Survey of the SIGO and MITO groups

        Giorgio Bogani,Giovanni Apolone,Antonino Ditto,Giovanni Scambia,Pierluigi Benedetti Panici,Roberto Angioli,Sandro Pignata,Stefano Greggi,Paolo Scollo,Mezzanzanica Delia,Massimo Franchi,Fabio Martinell 대한부인종양학회 2020 Journal of Gynecologic Oncology Vol.31 No.6

        Objective: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused rapid and drastic changesin cancer management. The Italian Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (SIGO), andthe Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian cancer and gynecologic malignancies (MITO)promoted a national survey aiming to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 on clinical activity ofgynecologist oncologists and to assess the implementation of containment measures againstCOVID-19 diffusion. Methods: The survey consisted of a self-administered, anonymous, online questionnaire. The survey was sent via email to all the members of the SIGO, and MITO groups on April 7, 2020,and was closed on April 20, 2020. Results: Overall, 604 participants completed the questionnaire with a response-rate of70%. The results of this survey suggest that gynecologic oncology units had set a proactiveapproach to COVID-19 outbreak. Triage methods were adopted in order to minimizein-hospital diffusion of COVID-19. Only 38% of gynecologic surgeons were concernedabout COVID-19 outbreak. Although 73% of the participants stated that COVID-19 hasnot significantly modified their everyday practice, 21% declared a decrease of the use oflaparoscopy in favor of open surgery (19%). However, less than 50% of surgeons adoptedspecific protection against COVID-19. Additionally, responders suggested to delay cancertreatment (10%–15%), and to perform less radical surgical procedures (20%–25%) duringCOVID-19 pandemic. Conclusions: National guidelines should be implemented to further promote the safety ofpatients and health care providers. International cooperation is of paramount importance,as heavily affected nations can serve as an example to find out ways to safely preserve clinicalactivity during the COVID-19 outbreak.

      • KCI등재

        Fertility-sparing surgery for women with stage I cervical cancer of 4 cm or larger: a systematic review

        Violante Di Donato,Giuseppe Caruso,Carolina Maria Sassu,Giusi Santangelo,Giorgio Bogani,Francesco Plotti,Flavia Sorbi,Giorgia Perniola,Innocenza Palaia,Gianluca Terrin,Roberto Angioli,Pierluigi Benede 대한부인종양학회 2021 Journal of Gynecologic Oncology Vol.32 No.6

        Objective: To investigate current evidence on oncological, fertility and obstetric outcomes of patients with stage I cervical cancer of 4 cm or larger undergoing fertility-sparing surgery (FSS). Methods: Systematic review of studies including women affected by stage I cervical cancer ≥4 cm who underwent FSS. Main outcome measures: disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), pregnancy rate, live birth rate, premature delivery rate. Results: Fifteen studies met all eligibility criteria for this systematic review, involving48 patients affected by cervical cancer ≥4 cm who completed FSS. Three patients (6.3%) experienced a recurrence and one of them (2.1%) died of disease. The 5-year DFS rate was 92.4%. The 5-year OS rate was 97.6%. A significantly shorter 5-year DFS was reported for high-risk patients (G3, non-squamous histotype, diameter ≥5 cm) compared with low-risk (74.7% vs. 100%; log-rank test, p=0.024). Data about fertility outcomes were available for 12 patients. Five patients out of 12 (41.7%) attempted to conceive with an estimated pregnancy rate of 80%, a live birth rate of 83.3% and a premature delivery rate of 20%. Conclusion: Women with high tumor grade, aggressive histology and tumor size ≥5 cm have a higher risk of recurrence. Oncologic outcomes are encouraging among low-risk patients; however, the lack of high-quality studies makes it difficult to draw any firm conclusions. Prospective multicentric clinical trials with a proper selection of inclusion/exclusion criteria should be conducted in women with low-risk factors, strong desire to preserve their fertility and high likelihood to conceive.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼