RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재

        Prediction of the thorax/pelvis orientations and L5-S1 disc loads during various static activities using neuro-fuzzy

        Seiyed Hamid Mousavi,Hassan Sayyaadi,Navid Arjmand 대한기계학회 2020 JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Vol.34 No.8

        Spinal posture including thorax/pelvis orientations as well as loads on the intervertebral discs are crucial parameters in biomechanical models and ergonomics to evaluate the risk of low back injury. In vivo measurement of spinal posture toward estimation of spine loads requires the common motion capture techniques and laboratory instruments that are costly and time-consuming. Hence, a closed loop algorithm including an artificial neural network (ANN) and fuzzy logic is proposed here to predict the L5-S1 segment loads and thorax/pelvis orientations in various 3D reaching activities. Two parts namely a fuzzy logic strategy and an ANN from this algorithm; the former, developed based on the measured postures of 20 individuals, is to determine 3D orientations of the thorax/pelvis during the various activities while the latter, developed based on the predicted L5-S1 loads by a detailed musculoskeletal model of the spine, is to estimate compression/shear forces at the L5-S1 disc. The fuzzy logic rules are extracted based on Sugeno inference engine and the ANN is trained by LevenbergMarquardt algorithm. To evaluate the performance of the proposed strategy, the comparison between the predicted values, the target values and the presented values in the literature are reviewed. The comparison demonstrated that the proposed algorithm had a promising performance. The maximum relative error for all predictions was ~19 % and with respect to the target values while this error for the literature’s values was ~37 %. Also, the average improvement of the proposed strategy was ~17 % with respect to the presented strategy in the literature.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼