http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
박원빈(Park, Wonbin),이순철(Lee, Soon-cheul) 한국산업경제학회 2022 산업경제연구 Vol.35 No.5
본 연구는 인도 농식품 가공업을 대상으로 효율성을 분석하고 생산성 변화에 대한 결정요인을 분석하였다. 이를 위해 2015-20년까지의 Prowess의 기업별 자료를 기초로 자료포락분석(DEA)과 맘퀴스트(Malmquist) 분석을 진행하며 정태적-동태적 효율성을 복합적으로 검토하였다. 또 생산성 변화를 의미하는 맘퀴스트 지수에 대한 결정요인도 고정효과 패널모형을 활용하여 분석하였으며, 그 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 자료포락분석에 따르면 평균 효율성은 0.2로 낮은 수준에 머물러 있다. 또 효율적 상태의 기업과 규모 효율성을 달성한 기업은 각각 5%와 10% 수준에 불과했다. 둘째, 맘퀴스트 지수는 1.001로 나타났다. 이는 생산성이 연평균 0.1% 수준으로 증가한 것으로 생산성 개선 정도가 보합 수준에 있음을 의미한다. 이는 기술 향상에도 불구하고 생산 효율성 저하에 따른 결과이다. 셋째, 맘퀴스트 지수에 대한 결정요인을 살펴보면, 신생 또는 소규모 기업과 같은 특성과 연구개발 같은 요인은 생산성 개선에 도움이 되었다. 반면에, 원자재 구매, 금융지출 등 비용 부담은 생산성 개선에 부정적 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 이를 통해 본고는 기업 역량 강화와 함께 기업 비용 절감을 위한 효율적 경영시스템 확립이 필요함을 확인하였다. This study examines productivity in the Indian agricultural food processing industry. We utilize data envelope analysis(DEA) and Malmquist analysis on the firms unit data during 2015-2020 to examine static and dynamic aspects of productivity. We also further analyzed the determinants of the Malmquist index by using panel regression, which means changes in productivity, and the results are as follows. First, data envelope analysis shows an average efficiency of 0.2 levels. Efficient companies and companies that achieved scale efficiency appeared at the 5% and 10%, respectively. Second, Malmquist Index is 1.001, which means that the productivity improvement is 0.1% per year. The reason is because of low-production efficiency despite technological innovation. Third, factors such as newer firms, smaller firms and R&D investment help to improve productivity according to the determinants of the Malmquist Index. On the other hand, the cost burden such as the purchase of raw materials and financial expenditure adversely affects the improvement. These results show that it is necessary to establish an efficient management system to reduce corporate costs with strengthening competitiveness.
이원빈,권기양 새한영어영문학회 2008 새한영어영문학 Vol.50 No.3
In this paper, we address the problem of the previous approaches to locative inversion constructions in English. We point out the conceptual problems related to the assumption put forward by Hoekstra & Mulder(l990), Den Dikken(2006b), Lee & Kwon(2007), inter alia. Following Chomsky(2005) and Lee & Kwon(2008), we propose that the locative PP does not undergo movement to the Spec of CP via the Spec of TP successive-cyclically, but rather that it moves to the Spec of TP and the Spec of CP in parallel. We also explore the agreement relation between probe T and goal DP in the locative inversion constructions, following Chomsky's(2005) notion of phase.
Argument Scrambling and Object Shift
Wonbin Lee and Sungeum Cho 한국생성문법학회 2003 생성문법연구 Vol.13 No.1
The aim of this paper is to explain the general property of short distance argument scrambling in Korean and to show that scrambling is closely related to object shift. In other words, only the objects which undergo object shift can undergo scrambling. Hence, the indefinite objects which occur in the sentence-initial position undergo two operations, object shift and scrambling. The former is A-movement which is driven by EPP-feature checking. The latter is A'-movement which is focus-driven. The puzzling properties of argument scrambling such as anaphora binding and weak crossover effects are accounted for as a consequence of the two step derivation.
Focus and Particle Constructions
Lee, Wonbin The Korean Association for the Study of English La 2004 영어학 Vol.4 No.2
This paper concerns the issue related to the focus phenomena with a particular reference to the two alternating orders (continuous vs. discontinuous orders) in particle constructions in English. To explain the alternation of word order in particle constructions, I will argue that the choice of word order is closely related to the focus property of the object DPs. Following Drubig (2003), I will assume that focus-feature is taken to be a syntactic feature assigned freely to a lexical head in the process of the mapping into Lexical Array (LA) from the lexicon (LEX). I argue that the focus-marked object DP cannot move out of its focus domain and thus the continuous order is derived. In the case of non-focus-marked object DP, however, the object DP moves out of VP in order to receive an appropriate interpretation. As a result, the discontinuous order is derived.