APPLICATION OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT: LEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND SAVING MANUFACTURING (ASPECTS OF MANAGEMENT AND PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION)

Kulinich, Tetiana,Berezina, Liudmyla,Bahan, Nadiia,Vashchenko, Iryna,Huriievska, Valentyna International Journal of Computer ScienceNetwork S 2021 International journal of computer science and netw Vol.21 No.5

Successfully adapting to digital and customer-oriented transformation, the concept of lean manufacturing professes the philosophy of creating greater benefit while minimizing losses. These losses are operations that do not add value in the production process to ensure the efficiency, flexibility, and profitability of projects. In the context of broad automation and digitalization of all sectors of the economy, mechanisms for combining automation technologies and lean production are becoming available. Moreover, when it comes to the efficient use of financial, human, or material resources, it is clear that the use of Industry 4.0 technologies can be an effective tool for achieving the goals of lean production, as many of them pursue the same goal. In this context, this article aims to study the effectiveness of the implementation of project management concepts at the global level and identify the main factors influencing its effectiveness to ensure the achievement of lean production through LEAN technologies and Industry 4.0 technologies. To achieve this goal, several statistical indicators were selected and several statistical methods of analysis were used: pairwise correlation, regression analysis, methods of comparison, synthesis, and generalization. Statistical analysis was conducted according to a survey conducted by the Project Management Institute (PMI) in 2020. An economic-mathematical model of dependence of project effectiveness in different regions of the world on the level of implementation of project management approaches is built, which shows that the increase in project effectiveness by 85% is due to financial losses, technical training, and consumer orientation. These results allow project managers to develop appropriate strategies to improve project management approaches at all levels. It is established that LEAN technologies and technologies of Industry 4.0 have several tools that have a positive effect on minimizing losses following the concept of lean production. Besides, given that the technology of Industry 4.0 is focused on the automation of Lean Production technology, a mechanism for the introduction of lean production using these technologies and methods.

Umklapp-assisted electron transport oscillations in metal superlattices

Kulinich, S. I.,Gorelik, L. Y.,Gredeskul, S. A.,Shekhter, R. I.,Jonson, M. American Physical Society 2012 Physical review. B, Condensed matter and materials Vol.85 No.18

Nanomechanics of a magnetic shuttle device

Kulinich, S. I.,Gorelik, L. Y.,Parafilo, A. V.,Shekhter, R. I.,Park, Y. W.,Jonson, M. THE AIP 2014 Low Temperature Physics Vol.40 No.10

Discourses on Diversity in Medieval Interpretation of the Qur’ān

Alena Kulinich 한국이슬람학회 2019 한국이슬람학회논총 Vol.29 No.2

References to historical conceptions of diversity in the Islamic tradition have become an important part of modern debates about Islam, tolerance, and pluralism. While the concepts of ikhtilāf (recognised difference of opinion among the Islamic jurists) in jurisprudence and ahl al-dhimma (protected communities of non-Muslims under Islamic rule) in the domain of interfaith relations, have received most scholarly attention, this article draws attention to conceptions of diversity in the field of exegesis of the Qur’ān (tafsīr), and in particular to the practice of many medieval exegetes who included into their commentaries a diversity of interpretations of the Qur’ānic verses. This practice has not passed unnoticed in modern scholarship. It has been attributed, for example, to the literary conventions of the genre of classical tafsīr, and explained as being beneficial for intra- Muslim disputations in cases where the exegetes recorded the interpretations of their doctrinal opponents. It has also been treated as a manifestation of the juridical principle of ikhtilāf in the field of Qur’ānic exegesis. To complement this focus on the practice, this article raises a question about how medieval Muslim thinkers themselves engaged with the question of interpretative diversity with regard to the Qur’ān. The article offers a preliminary consideration of this question through an overview of the five selected discourses on exegetical diversity from among the medieval Muslim authors. Although their contributions by no means exhaust the treatment of this subject in medieval Islamic literature, they nevertheless exemplify a range of approaches to interpretative diversity, from explaining its causes by reference to epistemological challenges and the nature of language, and validating it through the recognition that the text itself has several levels of meaning; to attempts to justify exegetical diversity as reflecting the divine will, and, on the opposite side, to narrow its boundaries. As such, these discourses could provide a starting point for further study of conceptions and attitudes to interpretative diversity in the Islamic tradition.

Memories of Tomorrow: The Modern Relevance of the Mu‘tazilah in the Writings of Aḥmad Amīn (1886–1954)

Alena Kulinich 서울대학교 아시아연구소 2022 아시아리뷰 Vol.12 No.1

This article discusses modern interpretations of Mu‘tazilism, a rationalist tradition of Islamic thought that flourished during the time of the ‘Abbasid Caliphate (750–1258). Modern endeavours to rediscover and revive this tradition since the early 20th century, often referred to as ‘Neo-Mu‘tazilism’, span geographical, cultural, and political divides. The focus of this article is on the contribution of the prominent Egyptian intellectual Aḥmad Amīn (1886–1954) who is credited with rehabilitating Mu‘tazilism in his works on the intellectual history of Islamic civilization. Aiming to explore the intellectual efforts involved in ‘thinking tradition forward’, this article examines the ways in which Aḥmad Amīn envisaged the relevance of Mu‘tazilism for the present and future of Muslim societies and the strategies he employed to convey its modern relevance to his readers.

Discourses on Diversity in Medieval Interpretation of the Qur’ān

( Alena Kulinich ) 한국이슬람학회 2019 한국이슬람학회논총 Vol.29 No.2

References to historical conceptions of diversity in the Islamic tradition have become an important part of modern debates about Islam, tolerance, and pluralism. While the concepts of ikhtilāf (recognised difference of opinion among the Islamic jurists) in jurisprudence and ahl al-dhimma (protected communities of non-Muslims under Islamic rule) in the domain of interfaith relations, have received most scholarly attention, this article draws attention to conceptions of diversity in the field of exegesis of the Qur’ān (tafsīr), and in particular to the practice of many medieval exegetes who included into their commentaries a diversity of interpretations of the Qur’ānic verses. This practice has not passed unnoticed in modern scholarship. It has been attributed, for example, to the literary conventions of the genre of classical tafsīr, and explained as being beneficial for intra- Muslim disputations in cases where the exegetes recorded the interpretations of their doctrinal opponents. It has also been treated as a manifestation of the juridical principle of ikhtilāf in the field of Qur’ānic exegesis. To complement this focus on the practice, this article raises a question about how medieval Muslim thinkers themselves engaged with the question of interpretative diversity with regard to the Qur’ān. The article offers a preliminary consideration of this question through an overview of the five selected discourses on exegetical diversity from among the medieval Muslim authors. Although their contributions by no means exhaust the treatment of this subject in medieval Islamic literature, they nevertheless exemplify a range of approaches to interpretative diversity, from explaining its causes by reference to epistemological challenges and the nature of language, and validating it through the recognition that the text itself has several levels of meaning; to attempts to justify exegetical diversity as reflecting the divine will, and, on the opposite side, to narrow its boundaries. As such, these discourses could provide a starting point for further study of conceptions and attitudes to interpretative diversity in the Islamic tradition.

Parking Site Selection In Downtown of Khabarovsk City Using GIS

Irina Kulinich,Heewon Lee 보안공학연구지원센터 2016 International Journal of Smart Home Vol.10 No.4

Public parking as a part of a modern urban transportation system plays an important role in decreasing the load of heavy traffic. Optimum site selection for public parking spaces not only increases the parking efficiency, but also decreases marginal car parking and therefore, results in increase of streets’ width and traffic fluency. In the most cities, public parking site selection is done by traditional methods or just by visiting of the site. In this traditional method, considering all of the effective parameters in site selection is difficult and site selection is done by just considering some limited factors like land price. In this study, we introduce an optimum method for parking site selection using GIS based on Khabarovsk City. The study process consists of two steps. Firstly, it is finding effective criteria for parking site selection. Secondly, we build the model of parking site selection process based on our criteria. As the output of research is the model of parking site selection process which lead us to define suitable place for parking.

‘And if one asks… it is answered…’: the question-and-answer pattern in al-Ṭabarī’s (d. 310/923) commentary on sura al-Fātiḥa

Alena Kulinich 한국아랍어아랍문학회 2019 아랍어와 아랍문학 Vol.23 No.3

The literary form of ‘questions and answers’ (Arab. as’ila wa-ajwiba) has been employed in Islamic literature across writings from a wide variety of fields. This article focuses on the uses of this form in Islamic exegetical literature and gives a preliminary assessment of the question-and-answer pattern in the commentary on sura al-Fātiḥa in the tafsīr of Muḥammad ibn Jarīr al-Ṭabarī (d. 310/923). This assessment suggests that the question-and-answer form in al-Ṭabarī’s tafsīr was not only a method of elucidating the meaning of the Qur’ān and a technique of argumentation against al-Ṭabarī’s adversaries, but it also provided a framework for his refutation of the alternative interpretations of the text, and served as a means of asserting al-Ṭabarī’s standing as a commentator on the Qur’ān.

Rethinking Mu`tazilite tafsir: from essence to history

( Alena Kulinich ) 서울대학교 종교문제연구소 2015 종교와 문화 Vol.0 No.29

It has been common to approach the history of the interpretation of the Qur’an (tafsir) through the study of different traditions or ‘schools’ of tafsir. These ‘schools’ usually correspond to various Islamic intellectual/sectarian traditions and include, among others, the Twelver Shi‘ite, Sunni, Mu‘tazilite and Sufi tafsir traditions. An underlying assumption in this division is that each of these traditions developed a distinct approach to the text of the Qur’an, and that tafsir works authored by scholars associated with these ‘schools’ fall into recognisable traditions due to the manifestations of this approach in their texts. The ‘school’ framework has been applied in the classical studies on Qur’anic exegesis and continues to inform both the analysis of the history of Islamic exegesis and studies on individual commentaries on the Qur’an. Several recent publications, however, revisited this wellestablished framework. Centred on the fundamental question of ‘what makes an exegetical tradition a tradition?’, they raised a number of related questions concerning the precise characteristics of the various exegetical ‘schools’, the value of this notion for the analysis of individual commentaries on the Qur’an, and its validity as an analytical tool for understanding the history of Islamic exegesis. This article explores the implications that this critical engagement with the notion of an exegetical ‘school’ has for Mu‘tazilite tafsir. It shows that the arguments advanced in the course of this engagement are not only fully applicable to the case of Mu‘tazilite tafsir, they also reveal the limitations of the traditional approach to Mu‘tazilite tafsir which defines this tradition through reference to a single unique set of characteristics that the commentaries on the Qur’an written by Mu‘tazilite authors are thought to have. The article highlights some of these limitations, focusing on the exceptionalism and essentialism implied in this approach. It further suggests that the study of Mu‘tazilite tafsir could benefit from an adaptation of a historical rather than an essentialist framework. This historical framework implies that Mu‘tazilite exegetical tradition is regarded not as a homogeneous and static category, defined by a unique and unchanging ‘essence’, but approached from a historical perspective and seen as changing over time, and interacting with other trends of Islamic exegesis.

Digital Technologies in the Innovative and Structural Transformation of Low- and Middle-Income Economies

Tetiana Kulinich,Yuliia Lisnievska,Yuliia Zimbalevska,Tetiana Trubnik,Svitlana Obikhod International Journal of Computer ScienceNetwork S 2024 International journal of computer science and netw Vol.24 No.1

While in high-income countries the development of digital technology began in the 1970s, in low- and middle-income countries it began in the 1990s and even after 2005, due to the political regime that constrained economic development and innovation. At the same time, there are no studies of the relationship between technological development and structural changes through innovation in low- and middle-income countries. The article aims to quantify the relationship of the introduction of digital technologies on innovation, structural transformation of low- and middle-income economies. The industrial-agrarian economy of Uzbekistan with an authoritarian regime is in a state of transition to a market economy, while in Ukraine, there are active processes of Europeanization and integration into the EU. Ukraine's economy is commodity-based (the export of raw materials of industries and the agricultural sector in developed countries predominates) and industrial-agrarian. Digital technologies and the service sector are little developed in Uzbekistan. On the other hand, Ukraine has a more developed ICT sector. Uzbekistan is gradually undergoing an innovative and structural transformation of the economy: the productivity of the agricultural, industrial, and service sectors is growing, but the ICT sector is virtually undeveloped. In comparison, in Ukraine, there are no significant structural transformations due to a significant drop in productivity of the industrial sector, with stable growth of productivity of the agricultural sector due to technology and a slight increase in productivity of the service sector. It is revealed that Ukraine and Uzbekistan have undergone structural transformations of the economy in favor of the service sector, while the agricultural and industrial sectors produce less and less. If Uzbekistan remains the industrial-agrarian country with an aggregate share of the added value of these sectors 59% in 2019, Ukraine transits to the post-industrial type of economy where the added value of the service sector in GDP grows (55% compared to agrarian and industrial sectors at 42%).