http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
학교시설의 녹색건축인증제 개선을 위한 문헌분석에 관한 연구
윤요선,류수훈,Yun, Yo-Sun,Ryu, Soo-Hoon 한국교육시설학회 2014 敎育施設 Vol.21 No.2
Green Standard for Energy and Environmental Design(G-SEED) has been implemented for the realization of sustainable development and resource-saving and eco-friendly buildings from 2002. Studies about the green buildings are made actively and is being developed through constant revision. However, study results of green building have not been fully reflected in the standard. Therefore, this study analyzes the previous studies about G-SEED for school facilities and check the degree of to reflect the problems and improvements suggested in previous studies. This study will be a reference of future revision Substantial problems and requirements are not reflected in revision standard. Proposed improvement requirements are classed as to improve the items(establish specific standards, supplementation), strengthen standards(designate the prerequisite items), propose a new evaluation method, add new items. delete exist items and adjust the score. Therefore, future revision of G-SEED for school facilities should reflect the results of previous studies.
녹색건축 인증제도 업무용 건축물 개정 전·후 인증결과 비교분석
윤요선(Yun, Yo-Sun),채창우(Chae, Chang-U),김유진(Kim, Yu-Jin) 대한건축학회 2018 대한건축학회논문집 Vol.34 No.8
G-SEED has been introduced with the aim of reducing energy use and resources since 2002, as the system of certificating environmental friendliness of buildings to create comfortable environment. This study analyzed the changes of certification standard of G-SEED since the revision in 2016, comparing certification results of office buildings by grade, category and certification items between G-SEED 2013-2 version and revised version of 2016. Also, this study analyzed the average points and their standard deviation of certification items including both deleted items and newly added items and extracted items needed to be reviewed in the future revision. In the revision, G-SEED has been extended its certification system to involve existing buildings and Innovative Design categories newly introduced with revising the certification items and difficulties. In revised version of G-SEED, the certification grade appeared to change its acquisition ratio decreasing Green2 and increasing Green4, during Green1 and Green3 were similar in proportion. The average scores by categories appeared decrease in Energy and Environmental Pollution category and Materials and Resources category, on the other hand, Maintenance category appeared the highest increase in the average score. Otherwise, Land Use and Transportation, Water Circulation, Ecology, Indoor Environment categories appeared similar average scores both version of G-SEED. In addition, the Innovative Design which was newly introduced category, seems to expect gradual gaining high scores according to technology development in future, although its possession has shown lower scores in revised version.
공동주택의 녹색건축인증(G-SEED) 취득현황 및 인증항목 특성 분석
윤요선(Yun Yo-sun),장대희(Jang Dae-Hee) 한국태양에너지학회 2022 한국태양에너지학회 논문집 Vol.42 No.6
G-SEED is a system that comprehensively evaluates the eco-friendliness of buildings. As a carbon reduction strategy in buildings, the role of G-SEED system is becoming increasingly important. In this study, the main revisions of G-SEED since 2016 are reviewed, and data related to certification results of multi-residential buildings are analyzed in detail. In addition, considerations for future revisions are reviewed. G-SEED has been reorganized six times since the 2016 revision, and only the 2016-2 version and 2016-6 version have been upgraded in difficulty. In particular, certification items for materials and resources have been strengthened. In the analysis of the certification results of multi-residential buildings, the score analysis by specialized field and the acquisition rate by certification items were analyzed. Energy and environmental pollution scored highest in the score analysis, while the ecological environment scored the lowest. Acquisition rate analysis revealed that 17 items were acquired at a level of 90%, and the lower five items were acquired at less than 30%. In addition, 17 items with a biased specific grade were identified through acquisition rate analysis. Based on these observations, the following issues need to be addressed in future revisions: 1) set the final grade and review the target score according to the level of difficulty for each specialization 2) review the existing required items or the mandatory items. 3) review whether to maintain certification items low acquisition rate. 4) review the level of difficulty adjustment within the underweight or overweight items with a specific grade.