RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제
      • 좁혀본 항목 보기순서

        • 원문유무
        • 음성지원유무
        • 원문제공처
          펼치기
        • 등재정보
          펼치기
        • 학술지명
          펼치기
        • 주제분류
          펼치기
        • 발행연도
          펼치기
        • 작성언어
        • 저자
          펼치기

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재
      • KCI등재
      • 알루미늄 5052-H34 합금 적층재의 방탄성능과 파괴모드에 관한 연구

        朴泳義 건국대학교 산업대학원 2001 論文集 Vol.13 No.-

        In this paper, Al 5052-H34 alloy laminates and anodized Al 5052-H34 alloy laminates is tested to investigate the fracture behaviors(penetration modes) and resistance of ballistic impact. Resistance to penetration is determined by protection ballistic limit(V_50), a statical velocity with 50% probability for complete penetration, test method. Fracture behaviors and ballistic tolerance, described by penetration modes, are observed resulting from V_50 test and Projectile Through Plates (PTP) test respectively. PTP tests were conducted with 0° obliquity at room temperature using 5.56㎜ ball projectile. V50 tests with 0° obliquity at room temperature were conducted with projectiles that were able to achieve near or complete penetration during PTP tests. Surface Hardness tests were conducted using a micro vickers hardness tester. Surface Hardness, resistance to penetration, and penetration modes of Al 5052-H34 alloy laminates compared to those of anodized Al 5052-H34 alloy laminates. As a result of Anodized Al 5052-H34 alloy laminates, it showed a superior protection ballistic limit and higher surface hardness than that of Al 5052-H34 alloy laminates.

      • KCI등재

        Hawthorne 과 Melville 의 친교와 영향관계

        박영의 한국호손학회 1997 미국소설 Vol.4 No.1

        Nathaniel Hawthorne and Herman Melville first met at a picnic on Monument Mountain in the Berkshires in Massachusetts on August 5, 1850. Participents also included were Oliver Wendel Holms, Evert Duyckinck, Cornelious Mathews, and Dudley Field. The picnic bears an important mark in American literature as well as on the life and the works of Melville, especially on Moby-Dick. For, if it weren't for their historic meeting, there would not have been Moby-Dick as we have it today. The novel was first designed as a story on whalings and it was near completion in August of 1850 when they met. After reading Hawthorne's Tales for the first time in July and meeting its author in August, Melville, however, started reworking on the novel delaying its publication till October the next year. Melville published the novel with a dedication to Hawthorne, his mentor, $quot;in token of my admiration for his genius.$quot; What $quot;fascinated and fixed$quot; the younger writer was the $quot;blackness$quot; in Hawthorne which Melville thought was derived from Calvinistic doctrines of the innate depravity of human nature and Original Sin. According to Sophia Hawthorne, Melville $quot;dashed his tumultuous waves of thought up against Mr. Hawthorne's great, genial, comprehending silences.$quot; This habitual great $quot;silences$quot; made Melville think he was estranged and even $quot;rebuffed.$quot; After the publication of The Scarlet Letter in April 1850, the Hawthornes took residence at Lenox, Berkshires, six miles from Pitsfield where Melville moved from New York a month after meeting Hawthorne at the picnic and did mast of his reworking on Moby-Dick. Although their association in the Berkshires was brief, a little over a year, and their meetings not frequent enough to satisfy Melville's craving intellectual need, the influence of their meetings on the reworking on Moby-Dick was great enough to transform the original fishery story to a grand symbolic epic of the White Whale.

      • Robert Penn Warren의 小說 : 自我의 發見 All the King's Men을 中心으로

        朴泳義 충남대학교 1980 언어·문학연구 Vol.- No.2

        Robert Penn Warren을 미국 남부 소설의 전통을 잇는 Faulkver의 후계자로 보는 비평가들이 있다. 이들 두 작가에서 발견할 수 있는 첫 공통점은 이들의 작품이 다같이 남부를 소재로 하고 있다는 점이 될 것이다. 그러나 그것은 그렇게 중요한 것은 아니라 생각한다. 그 이유는 남부를 소재로 하고 있는 이들 두 작가의 작품은 다같이 그 역사적 배경과 감동적인 사실적 색체에도 불구하고, 지방적인 색채를 벗어나 인간의 보편적 진리를 추구하고 있기 때문이다.

      • KCI등재
      • KCI등재
      • KCI등재
      • KCI등재

        Dimmesdale 의 구원문제 : "By karma is this world led." - Atthasalini What they are in common and different

        박영의 한국호손학회 1994 미국소설 Vol.1 No.1

        A typical Christian interpretation of The Scarlet letter sees Dimmesdale's revelation of his secret sin before the town's peoples as a sign of his salvation, while it sees Chillingworth's cold revenge as a sign of damnation. But such naive Christian interpretation does not give fair explanation to the final fate of any of the three major characters-Dimmesdale, Hester, and Chillingworth. Such Christian interpretation overlooks the fact that Dimmesdale is a Puritan minister, and one of the famous Five Points of Calvinist theology explicitly states on $quot;unconditional election$quot; that $quot;God, under no obligation to save anyone, saves, or 'elects' whom he will, with no reference to faith or good works, Since all things are present in the mind of God at once, He knows beforehand who will be saved : and thus elution or reprobation is predestined. According to this doctrine, Dimmesdale's confession of his sin is no proof of his salvation. Dimmesdale's following absurd praise of God's mercy is dying man's desperate wish, not the proof of his salvation : God knows and He is merciful i He hath proved His mercy, moat of all, in my affliction. By giving me this burning torture to bear upon my breast ! By sending yonder dark and terrible old man, to keep the torture always at red-heat ! By bringing me hither, to die this death of triumphant ignominy before the people ! Had either of these agonies been wanting, I had been lost for ever ! Praise be His name ! His will be done ! Farewell ! On the other hand, Chillingworth is not so devilish as he seems. At least he is not a $quot;fiend$quot; sent by God to save Dimmesdale as the dying minister believes. His devilish revenge must have been beyond God's $quot;infinite$quot; mercy. But Dimmesdale's death brought him back a little humanity that was left in him and leaves all his great fortune to Pearl. This surely cannot be a devil's work. If it does not win God's pardon, it does at least win the reader's sympathy. As revengeful Captain Ahab still retained a drop of tear that contained more $quot;wealth$quot; than $quot;all the Pacific,$quot; Chillingworth didn't lose all his humanity which prevented him from becoming the final fate of Ethan Brand and Richard Digby who never reflected on their evil doings. Lastly, Nester leaves us least room, among the three, for any Christian interpretation. She is, from the beginning to the end, remains to be earthly woman longing for the happiness on earth, not in heaven. And it is very interesting to note, for us Orientals, that these three characters represent three poisons (tri-dosapaha) in Buddhism : raga (貧 = covetousness or craving = Hester), dvesa (瞋 = malice or anger = Chillingworth), moha (痴 = delusion or ignorence = Dimmesdale). These are the root of all human miseries. To avoid these pitfalls, one should abstain from any kind of obsession, even with God ox faith. Dimmesdale, Hester, and Chillingworth were obsessed with God, love, and revenge, respectively. Hester and Chillingworth were released of their obsession by Dirnmesdale's death. But Dimmesdale failed to achieve Enlightenment by casting off his obsession(his blind faith), which is the only way to Nirvana in Buddhism.

      • KCI등재

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼