RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    챗GPT 출현 이후 기계 번역과 인간 번역 간의 번역 문체 차이 변화 연구 = A Follow-up Study of Stylistic Differences between Human and Machine Translation with ChatGPT Added in the Mix

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108761961

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The present study explores whether new shifts have developed in the stylistic landscape of human vs. machine translation in the wake of ChatGPT’s arrival. For this purpose, it conducts a series of principal component analyses (PCAs) on a normalized frequency dataset comprising 67 morphological and syntactic linguistic features borrowed from Biber’s (1988) research on register variation. The dataset is derived from a corpus of Korean editorials from three Korean newspapers, their human English translations, and English translations generated by four machine translation systems (Papago, Google, DeepL, ChatGPT), including ChatGPT’s self-proofread versions. The analyses indicate that human and machine translation remain distinctly differentiated in terms of style, as demonstrated in previous studies. However, among the machine translation systems, ChatGPT, both in its translations and self-proofread versions, deviates significantly from the others. A closer examination of the linguistic features strongly associated with ChatGPT reveals that this difference can be attributed to the model’s intrinsic preference for a formal, written style. Notably, there are no substantial stylistic divergences between ChatGPT’s translations and its self-proofread versions.
    번역하기

    The present study explores whether new shifts have developed in the stylistic landscape of human vs. machine translation in the wake of ChatGPT’s arrival. For this purpose, it conducts a series of principal component analyses (PCAs) on a normalized ...

    The present study explores whether new shifts have developed in the stylistic landscape of human vs. machine translation in the wake of ChatGPT’s arrival. For this purpose, it conducts a series of principal component analyses (PCAs) on a normalized frequency dataset comprising 67 morphological and syntactic linguistic features borrowed from Biber’s (1988) research on register variation. The dataset is derived from a corpus of Korean editorials from three Korean newspapers, their human English translations, and English translations generated by four machine translation systems (Papago, Google, DeepL, ChatGPT), including ChatGPT’s self-proofread versions. The analyses indicate that human and machine translation remain distinctly differentiated in terms of style, as demonstrated in previous studies. However, among the machine translation systems, ChatGPT, both in its translations and self-proofread versions, deviates significantly from the others. A closer examination of the linguistic features strongly associated with ChatGPT reveals that this difference can be attributed to the model’s intrinsic preference for a formal, written style. Notably, there are no substantial stylistic divergences between ChatGPT’s translations and its self-proofread versions.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 한승희, "인간번역, 기계번역, 컴퓨터보조번역 간 문체 비교 연구: SFL 이론을 중심으로" 한국외국어대학교 2020

    2 이현주, "문학작품의 중-한 기계번역 결과의 결속구조 분석 - 인간번역과의 비교를 중심으로" 한국중어중문학회 (87) : 259-282, 2022

    3 이창수, "기계학습 알고리즘을 활용한 문학번역에서의 기계 번역과 인간 번역 결과물 분류 연구" 한국번역학회 22 (22): 199-217, 2021

    4 Biber, Douglas, "Variation across Speech and Writing" Cambridge UP 1988

    5 Kunilovskaya, Maria, "Translationese Features as Indicators of Quality in English-Russian Human Translation" 47-56, 2019

    6 Rothwell, Andrew, "Translation Tools and Technologies" Routledge 2023

    7 Burrows, John, "The Englishing of Juvenal : Computational Stylistics and Translated Texts" 36 (36): 677-699, 2002

    8 Toral, Antonio, "Reassessing Claims of Human Parity and Super-Human Performance in Machine Translation at WMT 2019"

    9 Rybicki, Jan, "Quantitative Methods in Corpus-Based Translation Studies" John Benjamins 231-248, 2012

    10 Nini, Andrea, "Multi-Dimensional Analysis: Research Methods and Current Issues" Bloomsbury Academic 67-94, 2019

    1 한승희, "인간번역, 기계번역, 컴퓨터보조번역 간 문체 비교 연구: SFL 이론을 중심으로" 한국외국어대학교 2020

    2 이현주, "문학작품의 중-한 기계번역 결과의 결속구조 분석 - 인간번역과의 비교를 중심으로" 한국중어중문학회 (87) : 259-282, 2022

    3 이창수, "기계학습 알고리즘을 활용한 문학번역에서의 기계 번역과 인간 번역 결과물 분류 연구" 한국번역학회 22 (22): 199-217, 2021

    4 Biber, Douglas, "Variation across Speech and Writing" Cambridge UP 1988

    5 Kunilovskaya, Maria, "Translationese Features as Indicators of Quality in English-Russian Human Translation" 47-56, 2019

    6 Rothwell, Andrew, "Translation Tools and Technologies" Routledge 2023

    7 Burrows, John, "The Englishing of Juvenal : Computational Stylistics and Translated Texts" 36 (36): 677-699, 2002

    8 Toral, Antonio, "Reassessing Claims of Human Parity and Super-Human Performance in Machine Translation at WMT 2019"

    9 Rybicki, Jan, "Quantitative Methods in Corpus-Based Translation Studies" John Benjamins 231-248, 2012

    10 Nini, Andrea, "Multi-Dimensional Analysis: Research Methods and Current Issues" Bloomsbury Academic 67-94, 2019

    11 Westin, Ingrid, "Language Change in English Newspaper Editorials" Rodopi 2002

    12 Hendy, Amr, "How Good Are GPT Models at Machine Translation? A Comprehensive Evaluation"

    13 Hu, Xianyao, "How Do English Translations Differ from Non-Translated English Writings? A Multi-Feature Statistical Model for Linguistic Variation Analysis" 15 (15): 347-382, 2019

    14 Läubli, Samuel, "Has Machine Translation Achieved Human Parity? A Case for Document-level Evaluation"

    15 Rebecca Webster, "Gutenberg Goes Neural: Comparing Features of Dutch Human Translations with Raw Neural Machine Translation Outputs in a Corpus of English Literary Classics" MDPI AG 7 (7): 32-, 2020

    16 Wu, Yonghui, "Google’s Neural Machine Translation System: Bridging the Gap between Human and Machine Translation"

    17 Lee, Changsoo, "Do Language Combinations Affect Translators’ Stylistic Visibility in Translated Texts?" 33 (33): 592-603, 2018

    18 BIber, Douglas, "Dimensions of Register Variation: A Cross-linguistic Comparison" Cambridge UP 1995

    19 Oakes, Michael, "Computational Stylometry of Wittgensteins Diktat fȕr Schlick" 3 (3): 221-240, 2013

    20 Lars, Ahrenberg, "Comparing Machine Translation and Human Translation: A Case Study" Association for Computational Linguistics 21-28, 2017

    21 Kocoń, Jan, "ChatGPT: Jack of All Trades, Master of None" 99 : 1-37, 2023

    22 Cegin, Jan, "ChatGPT to Replace Crowdsourcing of Paraphrases for Intent Classification: Higher Diversity and Comparable Model Robustness"

    23 Mitrović, Sandra, "ChatGPT or Human? Detect and Explain. Explaining Decisions of Machine Learning Model for Detecting Short ChatGPT-generated Text"

    24 Rybicki, Jan, "Burrowing into Translation : Character Idiolects in Henryk Sienkiewicz’s Trilogy and Its Two English Translations" 21 (21): 91-103, 2008

    25 Stamatatos, Efstathios, "Automatic Text Categorization in Terms of Genre and Author" 26 (26): 471-495, 2000

    26 Toral, Antonio, "Attaining the Unattainable? Reassessing Claims of Human Parity in Neural Machine Translation"

    27 전혜진, "AI 시대, 문학번역에서 기계번역과 인간번역 비교분석 연구 - 똘스또이의 『유년시절』번역 분석을 중심으로" 한국노어노문학회 31 (31): 111-154, 2019

    28 Ali Borji, "A Categorical Archive of ChatGPT Failures"

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼