Shin Saimdang, having lived in the 16<sup>th</sup> century in the Joseon Dynasty, was a woman writer and artist who not only practiced well the female virtues as a daughter, a wife and a mother, but also cultivated her artistic talents for...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105033546
2017
-
100
KCI등재
학술저널
153-188(36쪽)
0
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
Shin Saimdang, having lived in the 16<sup>th</sup> century in the Joseon Dynasty, was a woman writer and artist who not only practiced well the female virtues as a daughter, a wife and a mother, but also cultivated her artistic talents for...
Shin Saimdang, having lived in the 16<sup>th</sup> century in the Joseon Dynasty, was a woman writer and artist who not only practiced well the female virtues as a daughter, a wife and a mother, but also cultivated her artistic talents for paintings and calligraphic works for herself. In addition, for the past five centuries, she has been one of the rare figures in the Joseon Dynasty who became discussed by all and has been caught up in controversy in modern society. What made this woman in the women’s quarters, who had to live a passive life in the male-dominated society of the Joseon Dynasty, stand on the center stage of history for five consecutive centuries? The driving force likely originated from the fact that she was an outstanding “painter” on her own and the “mother of Yulgok, the great scholar.” This study aims to examine the epilogues left in the paintings and the calligraphic works of Saimdang, which help us to understand how the discourses on her were formed, evaluated and magnified in each period.
Like the evaluation records left in Yulgok’s Records on the Deceased Mother, in the 16<sup>th</sup> century she was praised as “painter Shin” who had gifts for paintings of grapes and the landscape, succeeding the painting style of An Gyeon, a painter in the early Joseon Dynasty. However, from the middle of the 17th century onwards, the recognition of her underwent a rapid change, with Song Si-yeol at the center of it. He recognized her as an eminent mother of Yulgok, the leader of the Seo-in faction, and equated her as Mrs. Hu, the mother of Cheng Hao and Cheng Yi in the Song Dynasty of China. In addition, since he showed a negative view on her landscape paintings, the epilogues on them disappeared after that. In other words, because of him, the landscape paintings, which had made her a conspicuous painter, disappeared, replaced with those of birds and insects.
Succeeding his opinion, the noblemen who led the discourse in the 18<sup>th</sup> century, reemphasized her as a woman with Confucian female virtues, reaching a conclusion that it is natural she is a “mother of Yulgok.” More concretely comparing to the verses in《Shijing》 among the Confucian scriptures, they emphasized her female virtues. From the viewpoint of the epilogues in the 19<sup>th</sup> century, she was evaluated as the epitome of motherhood. This was mostly promoted by the clan of Pyeongsan Shin. Covered by that clan, the artistic merits of her works paled into insignificance.
As for the common features of the epilogues for her works, except for the 16<sup>th</sup> century, from the epilogue of Song Si-yeol on, her works were evaluated from the viewpoint of the position of the “mother of Yulgok,” not that of the performances of her works themselves. The noblemen themselves were also exclusively selected from the Seo-in and Noron faction which respected Yulgok as the leader of the scholars at that time. Her paintings and calligraphic works were served as one of the auxiliary substances to consolidate her position of “mother of Yulgok.” However, although in the epilogues of her works there are some limitation that made her not be “painterShin,” but be “mother of Yulgok,” it cannot be denied that her works could keep themselves in existence, since she was a “mother of Yulgok.”
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 박지현, "화가에서 어머니로:신사임당을 둘러싼 담론의 역사" 동양한문학회 25 (25): 141-168, 2007
2 이성미, "조선시대 여류화가 연구" (51) : 1993
3 김수진, "전통의 창안과 여성의 국민화: 신사임당을 중심으로" 한국사회사학회 (80) : 215-255, 2008
4 사단법인 율곡학회, "율곡학연구총서" 원영출판사 2007
5 고연희, "신사임당, 그녀를 위한 변명" 다산기획 2016
6 사단법인 율곡학회, "신사임당 탄신 500주년 기념논문집" 원영출판사 2004
7 이숙인, "신사임당 담론의 계보학 (1): 근대이전" 진단학회 (106) : 1-31, 2008
8 강릉시, "신사임당 가족의 詩書畵" 관동대학교 영동문화연구소 2006
9 이숙인, "신사임당 : 서인-노론의 聖母 프로젝트" 54 : 2014
10 사단법인 율곡학회, "시대를 앞서간 여인 신사임당" 원영출판사 2004
1 박지현, "화가에서 어머니로:신사임당을 둘러싼 담론의 역사" 동양한문학회 25 (25): 141-168, 2007
2 이성미, "조선시대 여류화가 연구" (51) : 1993
3 김수진, "전통의 창안과 여성의 국민화: 신사임당을 중심으로" 한국사회사학회 (80) : 215-255, 2008
4 사단법인 율곡학회, "율곡학연구총서" 원영출판사 2007
5 고연희, "신사임당, 그녀를 위한 변명" 다산기획 2016
6 사단법인 율곡학회, "신사임당 탄신 500주년 기념논문집" 원영출판사 2004
7 이숙인, "신사임당 담론의 계보학 (1): 근대이전" 진단학회 (106) : 1-31, 2008
8 강릉시, "신사임당 가족의 詩書畵" 관동대학교 영동문화연구소 2006
9 이숙인, "신사임당 : 서인-노론의 聖母 프로젝트" 54 : 2014
10 사단법인 율곡학회, "시대를 앞서간 여인 신사임당" 원영출판사 2004
11 이은상, "사임당의 생애와 예술" 성문각 1994
12 유정은, "사임당 평전 : 스스로 빛났던 예술가" 리베르 2016
13 이숙인, "그런 신사임당은 없었다: 권력과 젠더의 변주" 2009
장자철학에서 존재와 세계의 문제 - ‘무무’의 존재성과 그것의 ‘드러남 양상’을 중심으로
학술지 이력
| 연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 평가 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
| 2020-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | ![]() |
| 2017-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) | ![]() |
| 2013-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2010-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2008-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2005-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
| 2004-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 2003-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
학술지 인용정보
| 기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 0.34 | 0.34 | 0.36 |
| KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
| 0.33 | 0.33 | 0.736 | 0.15 |