상호교섭적 관점에 의한 대학 토론교육 - H대학 <말과 글> 교육 사례를 중심으로 - = A the Study on Discussion Education Focused on Transactional Perspective in a University - Based on Analyzing Cases of < Speaking&Writing > in H University.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This article has the aim to improve the discussion education in a university. About 21C, the universities of Korea have decided the speaking or the debate course into a general education system for reconsidering the communicative competence and the problem-solving ability of students. The discussion education has been performing a role as a general education to build the qualification to be a subject leaders who is able to lead autonomously himself in the critical and creative thinking, the smoothly and open communication and the communality and cultural life in the knowledge and information society. However, as they have taught mainly an insistence of a topic and an inspection of evidence for it and the importance of rational decision in the discussion education, it has been promoted the sense of excessive competition. Therefore, the discussion education need to improve this problem through `How` rather than `What` There were applied the study collecting student`s instructional materials and studying it. According to this procedure, the discussion education was applied to the transactional perspective. It is the course that the students are able to learn that the transaction is possible between `You` and `I` in a positive competition, also the organizing ability and the activity to make and operate a team, as well as the behavior of the mutual respect and the mutual cooperation, ultimately Sympathies through collaborative learning. As a result, the students were heightened their sense of accomplishment and confidence. Because the education in universities vary depending on learning students and it`s time, the longitudinal study for improvement of it`s curriculum will be the progressive study.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 양태종, "화술의 법칙" 유로서적 2005

2 진영복, "협력학습 수업 모형과 대학 글쓰기 교육" 시학과언어학회 (16) : 93-118, 2009

3 장춘익, "하버마스의 사상: 주요 주제와 쟁점들" 나남출판 1996

4 James T. Dillon, "토론 학습의 이론과 실제" 교육과학사 1997

5 Kathryn Sue Young, "토론 연습" 한언 2003

6 옥유미, "토론 교육 방법 연구: 상호교섭적 관점을 중심으로" 한국교원대 2009

7 강길호, "커뮤니케이션과 인간" 한나래 1995

8 김현미, "친밀한 적: 신자유주의는 어떻게 일상이 되었나" 이후 2010

9 서신혜, "창조적 사고와 글쓰기" 한양대학교 출판부 2009

10 立花, "지의 정원" 예문 2010

11 Martin Bryan, "좋은 화법과 화법지도" 교육과학사 1995

12 Eric Cobast, "일반 교양의 기본 개념 이해" 동문선 2004

13 Ellen, D. Gagne, "인지심리와 교수- 학습" 교육과학사 1997

14 김현주, "인문교양교육과 독서토론" 한국교양교육학회 5 (5): 229-261, 2011

15 이선옥, "여성 리더십 함양을 위한 토론수업 모형 연구: 숙명여대 사례를 중심으로" 아시아여성연구소 46 (46): 183-213, 2007

16 Lévinas, Emmanuel, "시간과 타자" 문예출판사 85-, 1996

17 Christopher Phillips, "소크라테스씨. 질문있어요!" 민음사 2007

18 이창덕, "삶과 화법" 박이정 2010

19 Nel Noddings, "배려 교육론" 다른우리 2002

20 신성환, "말이 힘이다 삶이 문화다" 한양대학교 출판부 2009

21 H. Rosovsky, "대학. 갈등과 선택" 삼성경제연구소 1990

22 송경숙, "담화 분석 대화 및 토론 분석의 실제" 한국문화사 2002

23 유동엽, "논쟁의 불일치 조정 양상에 관한 연구" 서울대 2004

24 정희모, "글쓰기 교육과 협력학습" 삼인 2006

25 서정혁, "‘찬반 대립형 독서토론’ 모형 연구- 교보ㆍ숙명 전국독서토론대회 모형을 중심으로" 한국독서학회 (21) : 257-284, 2009

26 David L. Vancil, "Rhetoric and Argumentation" Colorado State university Press 1998

27 Freedman, A, "Reinventing the Rhetorical Tradition" Conway. Arkansas: L & S Books for the Canadian Council of Teachers of English 1980

28 John Dewey, "How we think" D.C. Health and Company 1933

29 Caligiuri, P, "Global competence: what is it. and can it be developed through global assignment" 24 (24): 2002

30 W. Edgar Moore, "Creative and critical thinking" Boston : Houghton Mifflin 1967

31 Freely, A. J, "Argumentation and Debate: Critical Thinking for Reasoned Decision Making(9th)" Belmont. C.A.: Wadsworth Publishing Co 1996

32 Richard D, "Argumentation and Critical Desicion Making" 2001