한국인과 외국인 한국어 고급 학습자의 읽기과정 중 도약과 회귀 비교 -시선추적 기법(Eye-tracking)을 활용하여- = Comparison of Saccade and Regression between Koreans and Advanced Non-Korean Learners during Reading Process-Utilizing Eye-tracking Technology-

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Hyunjin Kim. 2015.12.31. Comparison of Saccade and Regression between Koreans and Advanced Non-Korean Learners during Reading Process-Utilizing Eye-tracking Technology-. Bilingual Research 61, 67-94. The purpose of this research is to clarify the differences on eye fixation, saccade, and regression between Koreans and advanced non-Korean learners during a reading process using eye-tracking technology. To comprehend the reading process between two groups, the need for precise and scientifically quantified data was evident. By using eye-tracking devices, the following was discovered. First, the difference between Koreans and advanced non-Korean learners on number of eye fixation was determined. The number of eye fixation for Koreans and advanced non-Korean learners was 66 and 114.3, respectively, which indicated that Koreans automated eye movements, instead of fixation, during the reading process. Second, the following was measured between Koreans and advanced non-Korean learners: total saccade length, saccade counts average, saccade length average, and the number of saccade letters. Total saccade length and saccade counts average were higher for the advanced non-Korean learners, but this is because the task took longer to complete for the non-Koreans. Saccade length average for the Koreans was 181.5px, while that for the non-Koreans was 143.8px. After converting the pixels to number of letters, the Koreans saccade 8 to 9 letters, while the non-Koreans saccade 6 to 7 letters, which corresponded to the result from Rayner(1997). Third, regression counts and regression rate average of the Area of Interests(AOIs) for Koreans and advanced non-Korean learners were investigated, and regression rate average for the non-Koreans(14.2 times) was higher than that for the Koreans(11.4 times). However, after investigating regression rate average between the groups, the Koreans(17.2%) showed higher rate than the non-Koreans(14.6%). Hence, Koreans showed smaller saccade counts average and regression counts, indicating that Koreans had better understanding of the content. (Ewha Womans University)

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이춘길, "한글을 읽는 시선의 움직임" 서울대학교 출판부 2004

2 심상민, "한국어 학습자의 읽기 과정에 관한 연구" 서울대학교 대학원 2000

3 전수정, "학문 목적 읽기 교육을 위한 한국어 학습자의 요구 분석 연구" 연세대학교 교육대학원 2004

4 수파펀 분롱, "텍스트 이해에서 문어 담화 지식 활용에 관한 연구 -태국인 한국어 학습자의 사고 구술 자료를 대상으로-" 국제한국어교육학회 288-300, 2012

5 최소영, "우리글 읽기에서 지각 폭 연구" 한국인지과학회 20 (20): 573-601, 2009

6 고성룡, "우리 문장 읽기에서 안구 운동의 특성:어절 길이, 단어 빈도 및 착지점 관련 효과" 한국인지과학회 18 (18): 325-350, 2007

7 김율, "우리 글을 읽는 초보 독자의 안구 운동 특성" 단국대학교 대학원 2009

8 고성룡, "어린이 글 읽기에서 나타나는 안구 운동의 특징" 한국인지과학회 21 (21): 481-503, 2010

9 최소영, "안구운동추적기법을 활용한 읽기장애 연구의 도입과 전망: 국내 연구 현황을 중심으로" 한국학습장애학회 9 (9): 121-136, 2012

10 최숙기, "안구 추적 시스템을 활용한 읽기 과정에 나타난 독자의 성별 차이 연구" 학습자중심교과교육학회 14 (14): 573-597, 2014

11 김현진, "시선추적 기법(Eye-tracking)을 활용한 한국어 읽기과정 분석 연구 - 평균적인 독자와 읽기에 능숙한 독자를 중심으로 -" 한국언어문화교육학회 11 (11): 131-159, 2015

12 김현진, "속독 훈련이 읽기 속도와 독해력에 미치는 영향" 이중언어학회 (48) : 23-48, 2012

13 이향숙, "사고구술을 통한 한국어 학습자의 읽기과정 연구" 고려대학교 교육대학원 2009

14 박영민, "눈동자 움직임 분석을 통한 중학생, 고등학생 및 대학생의 읽기 특성 비교" 학습자중심교과교육학회 12 (12): 165-189, 2012

15 윤낙영, "난이도가 다른 덩이글 읽기에서의 안구운동 양상" 한국인지과학회 20 (20): 291-307, 2009

16 McConkie, G. W., "Vision and visual dyslexia" Macmillian Press 251-262, 1991

17 Andrew Sangpil Byon, "Understanding the reading process of beginning American KFL learners : Using Think-Aloud protocols" 국제한국어교육학회 15 (15): 259-280, 2004

18 Rayner, K., "Understanding Eye Movements in reading" 1 (1): 317-339, 1997

19 Simon P. Liversedge, "The Oxford Handbook of Eye Movements" Oxford University Press 2011

20 Nuttall, C., "Teaching reading skills in a foreign language" Heinemann 1996

21 Grabe, W., "Reading in a Second Language: Moving From Theory to Practice" Cambridge University Press 2009

22 Cohen, A. D., "Language learning : Insights for learners, teachers and researchers" Newbury House 1990

23 Kuhn, M. R., "Fluency: A review of developmental and remedial practices" 95 : 3-21, 2003

24 Rayner, K., "Eye movements in reading and information processing : 20 years of research" 124 (124): 372-422, 1998

25 Rayner, K., "Eye movement as reflections of comprehension processes in reading" 10 (10): 241-255, 2006

26 Holmqvist, Kenneth, "Eye Tracking-A Comprehensive Guide To Methods and Measures" Oxford University Press 2011

27 Poole, A, "Encyclopedia of Human Computer Interaction" Idea Group 2006