Conflict of laws : cases, comments, questions

목차 (Table of Contents)

• CONTENTS
• PREFACE = ⅴ
• ACKNOWLEGMENTS = xi
• TABLE OF CASES = xxi
• TABLE OF AUTHORITIES= xxix
• PART Ⅰ. CHOICE OF LAW: THE BASIC MODEL
• Chapter 1. The Traditional Approach to Choice of Law = 2
• Section 1. Traditional Theory: A Survey of Jurisdiction-Selecting Rules = 2
• A Short History of Choice of Law = 2
• Alabama Great Southern R.R. Co. v. Carroll = 6
• Traditional Choice of Law Theory = 9
• The Place of Wrong = 14
• Milliken v. Pratt= 17
• The Place of Contracting= 20
• In Re Barrie's Estate= 25
• The Situs of Property =27
• White v. Tennant = 30
• Domicile = 33
• Miscellaneous Traditional Rules = 36
• Section 2. Traditional Practice: A Survey of Escape Devices = 39
• A. Characterization= 39
• Levy v. Daniels' U-Drive Auto Renting Co = 39
• Haumschild v. Continental Cas. Co. = 41
• Characterization as a Rational Process = 43
• B. Substance or Procedure? = 48
• Grant v. McAuliffe = 48
• The Substance-Procedure Distinction = 50
• Bournias v. Atlantic Maritime Co., Ltd = 55
• Statutes of Limitations and Other Problems = 59
• C. Renvoi = 61
• In Re Schneider's Estate = 61
• The Renvoi Problem = 64
• D. Public Policy, Penal Laws, and Tax Claims = 69
• Loucks v. Standard Oil Co. of New York = 69
• Mertz v. Mertz = 72
• Holzer v. Deutsche Reichsbahn-Gesellschaft et al. = 74
• Public Policy = 76
• Penal Laws = 79
• Tax Laws = 82
• Section 3. Pleading and Proving Foreign Law = 83
• Walton v. Arabian American Oil Co. = 83
• Notice and Proof of Foreign Law = 86
• Chapter 2. Modern Approaches to Choice of Law = 90
• Section 1. Statutory Solutions = 90
• Section 2. Party Autonomy and the Rule of Validation = 96
• Pritchard v. Norton = 96
• Siegelman v. Cunard White Star Ltd = 99
• Alternative Choice of Law Rules for Contracts = 102
• Wyatt v. Fulrath= 110
• Choice of Law for Inter Vivos and Testamentary Trusts = 113
• Section 3. Place of the Most Significant Relationship = 115
• Restatement (Second) Conflict or Laws (1971) = 115
• The Second Restatement = 117
• Wood Bros. Homes, Inc. v. Walker Adjustment Bureau = 120
• Bryant v. Silverman= 124
• Using the Second Restatement = 130
• Section 4. Interest Analysis =133
• A. Introduction= 133
• Chesny v. Marek = 133
• Marek v. Chesny = 136
• The Domestic Choice of Law Process = 138
• Brainerd Currie, Married Women's Contracts: A Study in Conflict-of-Laws Method = 139
• Brainerd Currie's “Governmental Interest Analysis” = 150
• B. Identifying False Conflicts = 152
• Tooker v. Lopez = 152
• Schultz v. Boy Scouts of America, Inc = 159
• False Conflicts = 165
• C. The “Unprovided-For” Case = 169
• Erwin v. Thomas = 169
• The “Unprovided-For Case” = 171
• D. Resolving True Conflicts = 175
• Lilienthal v. Kaufman = 175
• The Law of the Forum = 179
• Bernkrant v. Fowler = 184
• Moderate and Restrained Interpretation = 186
• Bernhard v. Harrah's Club = 188
• Comparative Impairment and Policy-Selecting Rules = 194
• Principles of Preference = 202
• Section 5. The Better Law= 206
• R.A. Leflar, Conflicts Law: More on Choice-Influencing Considerations = 206
• Milkovich v. Saari = 209
• Choice-Influencing Considerations and the Better Law = 213
• Section 6. Problems Old and New = 218
• A. D$$\acute e$$pe$$\barsigma $$age = 218
• An Imaginary Case: Adams v. Knickerbocker Nature Soc'y, Inc. = 218
• D$$\acute e$$pe$$\barsigma $$age in the Courts = 221
• B. Renvoi= 223
• Pfau v. Trent Aluminum Co = 223
• Renvoi and Interest Analysis = 225
• C. Rules Versus Standards = 230
• Paul v. National Life = 230
• Good Rules, Bad Rules, or no Rules? = 234
• D. Complex Litigation =237
• In re “Agent Orange” Product Liability Litigation = 237
• Choice of Law in Mass Actions = 248
• Chapter 3. The Constitution and Choice of Law = 258
• Section 1. The Limits of Legislative Jurisdiction = 258
• A. Due Process = 258
• Home Ins. Co. v. Dick =258
• Due Process and Choice of Law = 262
• B. Full Faith and Credit = 265
• Bradford Electric Light Co. v. Clapper = 265
• Alaska Packers Assoc. v. Industrial Acc. Comm'n = 267
• Pacific Employers Ins. Co. v. Industrial Acc. Comm'n = 270
• State Interests and the Constitution = 274
• C. Convergence = 278
• Allstate Ins. Co. v. Hague = 278
• Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Shutts = 288
• Minimum Contacts and Choice of Law = 292
• Section 2. The Obligation to Provide a Forum = 297
• Hughes v. Fetter = 297
• The "Equal Protection" Component of Full Faith and Credit = 300
• Tennessee Coal, Iron & R.R. Co. v. George = 303
• State Power to Keep Litigation at Home = 305
• Section 3. Unconstitutional Discrimination in Choice of Law = 307
• Supreme Court of N.H. v. Piper = 307
• Unconstitutional Discrimination in Choice of Law = 313
• PART Ⅱ. OTHER APPLICATIONS
• Chapter 4. Jurisdiction of Courts = 320
• Introductory Note = 320
• Section 1. Jurisdiction Based on the Relation of the Litigation to the Forum = 321
• The Evolution of Due Process = 321
• World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson = 329
• Asahi Metal Industry Co., Ltd. v. Superior Court = 338
• Section 1. Jurisdiction Based on the Relation of the Litigation to the Forum-Cont'd
• The Reach of the Long Arm = 343
• Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz = 349
• Jurisdiction in Contract Cases = 357
• Section 2. General Jurisdiction = 360
• Helicopteros Nacionales de Colombia, S.A. v. Hall = 360
• Jurisdiction Over “Unrelated” Causes of Action = 366
• Section 3. Attachment Jurisdiction = 371
• Shaffer v. Heitner = 371
• The Seductive "In Rem" Label = 385
• Shaffer and in Personam Jurisdiction = 389
• Section 4. Transient Jurisdiction =390
• Burnham v. Superior Court of California = 390
• Playing Tag = 399
• Chapter 5. Recognition of Judgments = 403
• Res Judicata: Domestic Policies of Finality = 403
• Full Faith and Credit to Judgments = 406
• Fauntleroy v. Lum =407
• Yarborough v. Yarborough = 411
• Judgments and the Interest of the Forum = 416
• Thomas v. Washington Gas Light Co = 422
• Limitations on Full Faith and Credit = 430
• Durfee v. Duke = 431
• The Foreclosure of Jurisdictional Issues = 435
• Clarke v. Clarke = 439
• Fall v. Eastin= 441
• The Land Taboo = 445
• Worthley v. Worthley = 450
• Equitable and Non-Final Decrees =453
• Union Nat'l Bank v. Lamb = 458
• The Obligation to Enforce Sister-State Judgments = 459
• Allen v. McCurry = 463
• State Judgments in Federal Courts = 467
• Congressional Implementation of the Full Faith and Credit Clause = 471
• Chapter 6. Special Problems of Choice of Law, Jurisdiction, and Recognition of Judgments in Divorce, Interstate Child Custody, and Decedents' Estates = 474
• Section 1. Divorce = 474
• Introductory Note = 474
• A. Ex Parte Divorce= 475
• Williams v. State of North Carolina [Ⅰ]= 475
• Ex Parte Divorce = 483
• Estin v. Estin = 483
• Section 1. Divorce-Cont'd
• Divisible Divorce =488
• B. Divorce by Consent = 493
• Williams v. State of North Carolina [Ⅱ] = 493
• Sherrer v. Sherrer =499
• Jurisdiction to Divorce and Collateral Attack on Migratory
• Divorce Decrees= 509
• Rosenstiel v. Rosenstiel =517
• Mexican Divorces =522
• Section 2. Child Custody = 524
• Vanneck v. Vanneck = 524
• In re Marriage of Ben-Yehoshua =528
• Matter of B.B.R = 534
• The "Interstate Child" = 542
• Section 3. Decedents' Estates = 552
• Chapter 7. Conflicts Between Federal and State Law = 555
• Section 1. Federal Question Jurisdiction = 555
• Osborn v. Bank of the United States = 555
• Federal Questions and Federal Interests = 563
• Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. Mottley = 566
• The Well Pleaded Complaint Rule = 567
• Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Thompson = 570
• State Incorporation of Federal Law (and Vice-Versa) = 579
• Section 2. The Erie Doctrine = 583
• Erie R. Co. v. Tompkins = 583
• The Law Applicable in Federal Courts = 588
• Guaranty Trust Co. of New York v. York = 593
• Outcome Determinativeness = 597
• Byrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Elec. Co-op., Inc = 597
• Byrd Balancing = 601
• Hanna v. Plumer = 602
• Erie and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure = 607
• Walker v. Armco Steel Corp = 608
• Interpreting Rules of Procedure = 613
• Section 3. Choice of Law in Federal-Court Cases Involving State-Created Rights = 616
• Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Elec. Mfg. Co = 616
• The Choice Among Conflicting State Laws Under Erie = 618
• Section 4. Federal Common Law = 621
• Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States = 621
• Bank of America v. Parnell = 623
• Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino = 625
• Federal Common Law, Preemption and Incorporation of State Law = 627
• Section 5. Federal Law in State Courts = 633
• Testa v. Katt = 633
• Section 5. Federal Law in State Courts-Cont'd
• Dice v. Akron, Canton & Youngstown R.R = 636
• State-Court Enforcement of Federal Law .= 640
• Chapter 8. International Conflicts = 644
• Section 1. The Scope of Legislative Jurisdiction, "Extraterritorial" Regulation = 644
• United States v. Yunis = 644
• The Limits of Legislative Jurisdiction in International Law = 649
• Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Arabian American Oil Co.= 654
• Moderation in the Extraterritorial Application of American Law = 660
• United States v. Verdago-Urquidez = 667
• The Extraterritorial Reach of the Constitution = 676
• Section 2. The European Perspective = 681
• Swiss Federal Statute on Private International Law (SPIL) = 681
• W. v. Ms. W = 686
• Civil Codes and Choice of Law = 689
• Section 3. The Act-of-State Doctrine = 691
• Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino = 691
• W.S. Kirkpatrick v. Environmental Tectonics Corp = 698
• Judicial Cognizance of Foreign Acts of State = 701
• Section 4. Recognition of Judgments = 707
• Hilton v. Guyot = 707
• Recognition of Foreign-Country Judgments = 711
• APPENDICES
• A. The Constitution of the United States = 719
• B. Title 28, United States Code = 723
• INDEX= 729