RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      주거유형에 따른 아동의 장소성 형성에 관한 연구 = A Study on Child's Formation of Placeness According to Resident Type

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T10998361

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This study is to see which places are recognized as significant or reluctant for children in their resident environmental space, which seems to become poor for children in their everyday activities, and to examine what has caused such formation of placeness of children. To pursue these aims, this study first consider some conceptual contexts of place and placeness and residential life of children. And then this study conducts questionary survey, to children in the sixth grade of 3 primary schools in Jisandong Soosunggu Daegu, especially dividing and comparing two groups of children who live in independent houses and row houses, and those who live in apartment complexes. The results of this study can be summarized as follows:
      First, we classified questions for child’s cognition about his resident environment physical factor, behavioral factor and psychological factor, and compared children in apartment from children in independent and row houses. As a result, only between physical and behavioral factor are statistically different, but not in psychological factor. That is, by the function that residence should be, child, regardless of the resident type, had the same feelings psychologically to their resident space. Also, children showed that they responded positively in all items and most of them are generally satisfied with their resident environment.
      Second, the village center of which children cognized, regardless of resident type, was responded all highly the school, we could see that the center for children was cognized the place, centralized by their activities rather than the real point of visual, symbolical and scale side. Also, the distance to the center showed to be very near to their resident place.
      Third, the past children, as they actively used an alley even a distant place like a natural environment, were good at their social, geographical accessibility to the distant places, different from now, diverse outdoor places showed generally even applying frequency. But the favorite place for actual children, different from the past, was responded downtown factor near to their houses, we could see that the meaning of downtown like a place for children who live in cities become very high. Besides, their favorite place responded corresponded to positive environmental factor, but also such negative environmental factor as traffic and harmful factor if they provide them with the resource to play with be their favorite place, while though the place corresponds to the positive environmental factor if the environment isn’t agreeable or funny children cognized there to be averse place. That is, the preference of place for child showed to be different not only its physical environment but also his contribution of importance of which child himself does by his actions in the place.
      Children cognize much the place they frequent within their resident environment or the environment they have been given some of visual stimulus, conscious or unconsciously showed resident environment have a lot of effect on children’s formation of placeness. In the dramatic process of urbanization so far, the effort to make image, apt to separate city or each of resident area, actually can be said to almost not be realized. The good image to the resident environment makes children form emotional security and harmonious placeness. So, the further resident environment should be planed to give children more positive effect.
      번역하기

      This study is to see which places are recognized as significant or reluctant for children in their resident environmental space, which seems to become poor for children in their everyday activities, and to examine what has caused such formation of pla...

      This study is to see which places are recognized as significant or reluctant for children in their resident environmental space, which seems to become poor for children in their everyday activities, and to examine what has caused such formation of placeness of children. To pursue these aims, this study first consider some conceptual contexts of place and placeness and residential life of children. And then this study conducts questionary survey, to children in the sixth grade of 3 primary schools in Jisandong Soosunggu Daegu, especially dividing and comparing two groups of children who live in independent houses and row houses, and those who live in apartment complexes. The results of this study can be summarized as follows:
      First, we classified questions for child’s cognition about his resident environment physical factor, behavioral factor and psychological factor, and compared children in apartment from children in independent and row houses. As a result, only between physical and behavioral factor are statistically different, but not in psychological factor. That is, by the function that residence should be, child, regardless of the resident type, had the same feelings psychologically to their resident space. Also, children showed that they responded positively in all items and most of them are generally satisfied with their resident environment.
      Second, the village center of which children cognized, regardless of resident type, was responded all highly the school, we could see that the center for children was cognized the place, centralized by their activities rather than the real point of visual, symbolical and scale side. Also, the distance to the center showed to be very near to their resident place.
      Third, the past children, as they actively used an alley even a distant place like a natural environment, were good at their social, geographical accessibility to the distant places, different from now, diverse outdoor places showed generally even applying frequency. But the favorite place for actual children, different from the past, was responded downtown factor near to their houses, we could see that the meaning of downtown like a place for children who live in cities become very high. Besides, their favorite place responded corresponded to positive environmental factor, but also such negative environmental factor as traffic and harmful factor if they provide them with the resource to play with be their favorite place, while though the place corresponds to the positive environmental factor if the environment isn’t agreeable or funny children cognized there to be averse place. That is, the preference of place for child showed to be different not only its physical environment but also his contribution of importance of which child himself does by his actions in the place.
      Children cognize much the place they frequent within their resident environment or the environment they have been given some of visual stimulus, conscious or unconsciously showed resident environment have a lot of effect on children’s formation of placeness. In the dramatic process of urbanization so far, the effort to make image, apt to separate city or each of resident area, actually can be said to almost not be realized. The good image to the resident environment makes children form emotional security and harmonious placeness. So, the further resident environment should be planed to give children more positive effect.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
      • 1. 연구배경 및 목적 = 1
      • 2. 연구방법 = 3
      • Ⅱ. 장소와 장소성에 관한 이론 = 9
      • 1. 장소의 개념과 형성과정 = 9
      • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
      • 1. 연구배경 및 목적 = 1
      • 2. 연구방법 = 3
      • Ⅱ. 장소와 장소성에 관한 이론 = 9
      • 1. 장소의 개념과 형성과정 = 9
      • 2. 장소 관련 개념 = 15
      • Ⅲ. 아동의 주거 생활에 관한 이론 = 19
      • 1. 아동의 생활공간으로서의 주거지 외부공간 = 19
      • 2. 아동의 장소성 분석을 위한 틀 = 24
      • Ⅳ. 근린 주거 전체에 대한 인지와 만족도 = 27
      • 1. 근린 주거에 대한 인지도 = 27
      • 2. 아파트와 단독주택·연립 거주 아동의 주거생활 비교 = 39
      • Ⅴ. 근린 주거 개별 장소에 대한 인지와 장소성 = 45
      • 1. 심상도를 통한 근린 주거 인지 분석 = 45
      • 2. 근린 주거에 대한 아동의 장소성 분석 = 57
      • Ⅵ. 결론 = 79
      • 1. 결론 = 79
      • 2. 제언 및 연구의 제한점 = 80
      • 참고문헌 = 83
      • Abstract = 87
      • 설문지 = 89
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼