RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      직업복귀한 산재노동자의 소득에 영향을 미치는 요인 연구 : 직업복귀유형, 장해 조기수용 및 재활서비스 요인을 중심으로

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T15686782

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      국문 초록 (Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      본 연구는 요양종결한 산재장해인의 삶의 질 지표 중 객관적 지표라 할 수 있는 소득을 대상으로 하였다. 구체적으로 직업복귀 유형(원직복귀,타직장재취업,창업), 자아존중감이나 자기효능감, 근 로복지공단의 재활서비스 수혜여부와 직업복귀 후 소득변화량간의 인과관계를 분석하는데 목적이 있다. 산재보험패널조사 데이터 (2013~2017)를 바탕으로 고정효과 모형과 성향점수매칭추정법의 분석모형을 통해 살펴본 독립변수와 종속변수와의 관계는 다음과 같이 분석되었다. 직장에 복귀한 유형에 있어 재해당시 소속된 원직장에 복귀한 경우가 다른 경우에 비해 소득변화량에 정(+)의 영향을 미칠 것이라는 가설과 재활서비스를 제공한 경우가 그렇치 않은 경우보다 소득 변화량에 정(+)의 영향을 미칠 것이라는 가설 이 채택될 통계적 근거가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 한편 자아존중 감과 자기효능감의 정도가 직업복귀 후 소득변화량에 정(+)의 영 향을 미칠 것이라는 가설은 통계적 지지를 얻지 못해 기각되었다.
      번역하기

      본 연구는 요양종결한 산재장해인의 삶의 질 지표 중 객관적 지표라 할 수 있는 소득을 대상으로 하였다. 구체적으로 직업복귀 유형(원직복귀,타직장재취업,창업), 자아존중감이나 자기효능...

      본 연구는 요양종결한 산재장해인의 삶의 질 지표 중 객관적 지표라 할 수 있는 소득을 대상으로 하였다. 구체적으로 직업복귀 유형(원직복귀,타직장재취업,창업), 자아존중감이나 자기효능감, 근 로복지공단의 재활서비스 수혜여부와 직업복귀 후 소득변화량간의 인과관계를 분석하는데 목적이 있다. 산재보험패널조사 데이터 (2013~2017)를 바탕으로 고정효과 모형과 성향점수매칭추정법의 분석모형을 통해 살펴본 독립변수와 종속변수와의 관계는 다음과 같이 분석되었다. 직장에 복귀한 유형에 있어 재해당시 소속된 원직장에 복귀한 경우가 다른 경우에 비해 소득변화량에 정(+)의 영향을 미칠 것이라는 가설과 재활서비스를 제공한 경우가 그렇치 않은 경우보다 소득 변화량에 정(+)의 영향을 미칠 것이라는 가설 이 채택될 통계적 근거가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 한편 자아존중 감과 자기효능감의 정도가 직업복귀 후 소득변화량에 정(+)의 영 향을 미칠 것이라는 가설은 통계적 지지를 얻지 못해 기각되었다.

      더보기

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This study have a purpose to search the indicators of quality of life for workers with disabilities who have finished medical treatment. This paper was written to analyze the causal relationship between the types of return to work, early acceptance of disability and whether to receive rehabilitation services. The analysis model of the propensity score matching estimation method was used in this study. The hypothesis that returning to the original workplace at the time of the disaster will have a more positive effect on income change than other cases, and the hypothesis that providing rehabilitation services will have a more positive effect on income change than not have a statistical basis to be adopted. Meanwhile, the hypothesis that the degree of self-esteem and self-efficacy will affect the amount of income change after returned to work was rejected due to lack of statistical support.
      번역하기

      This study have a purpose to search the indicators of quality of life for workers with disabilities who have finished medical treatment. This paper was written to analyze the causal relationship between the types of return to work, early acceptance of...

      This study have a purpose to search the indicators of quality of life for workers with disabilities who have finished medical treatment. This paper was written to analyze the causal relationship between the types of return to work, early acceptance of disability and whether to receive rehabilitation services. The analysis model of the propensity score matching estimation method was used in this study. The hypothesis that returning to the original workplace at the time of the disaster will have a more positive effect on income change than other cases, and the hypothesis that providing rehabilitation services will have a more positive effect on income change than not have a statistical basis to be adopted. Meanwhile, the hypothesis that the degree of self-esteem and self-efficacy will affect the amount of income change after returned to work was rejected due to lack of statistical support.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 제 1 장 서론··································································· 1 제 1 절 연구의 배경 및 목적·············································· 1제 2 절 연구의 대상과 범위················································ 2제 3 절 연구의 방법····························································· 3제 2 장 이론적 논의 및 선행연구 검토···················· 4 제 1 절 산재노동자의 삶의 질············································ 4 1. 삶의 질 「객관적 지표」로서의 소득·································· 5 2. 삶의 질 「주관적 지표」로서의 자아존중감······················ 7 3. 삶의 질 「주관적 지표」로서의 자기효능감······················ 8 4. 자기효능감과 장해수용························································ 10 제 2 절 산재보험 재활사업과 직업복귀···························· 13 1. 산재보험 재활사업······························································· 13 2. 재활사업의 운영체계···························································· 14 3. 산재노동자 직업복귀···························································· 19 제 3 절 선행 연구의 검토··················································· 22 1. 취업영향요인으로서의 제도적 환경·································· 22 2. 산재장해인과 선천성 장해인의 차이점···························· 23 3. 재해이후 취업력에 영향을 주는 구체적 요인················· 24 4. 장해수용과 자기효능감 및 자아존중감과의 관계··········· 25 5. 선행연구와의 차별성···························································· 27
      • 제 3 장 연구설계························································· 31 제 1 절 연구모형 및 가설설정············································31 제 2 절 변수설정···································································33 1. 인적 요인··············································································· 37 2. 직업요인과 환경요인···························································· 37 3. 장해에 대한 조기수용 정도················································ 38 4. 소득························································································· 38 제 3 절 자료의 수집 및 분석 방법····································39 1. 패널조사대상의 선정···························································· 39 2. 설문지 구성··········································································· 42 3. 분석방법················································································· 43
      • 제 4 장 통계분석 및 가설검증·································· 45 제 1 절 기초통계분석···························································45 1. 연구대상자의 일반적인 특성·············································· 45 2. 기술통계분석········································································· 46 제 2 절 측정도구의 타당성 및 신뢰성 검증····················49 1. 문항의 신뢰도 분석····························································· 49 2. 변수들간의 상관관계 분석·················································· 51 제 3 절 가설검증···································································52 1. 고정효과모형 및 성향점수매칭추정법 분석····················· 52 2. 직업복귀유형의 소득변화량에 대한 영향력 분석··········· 55 3. 장해에 대한 수용과 소득변화량에 대한 영향력 분석··· 60 4. 조절변수로서의 재활서비스 효과 분석···························· 61 제 4 절 해석 및 토론···························································63 1. 직업복귀유형과 객관적인 삶의 질···································· 63 2. 자아존중감, 자기효능감과 객관적인 삶의 질················· 66
      • 제 5 장 결 론······························································· 68 제 1 절 요약···········································································68 제 2 절 재활서비스와 관련한 정책적 시사점··················69 1. 인적 요인··············································································· 37 2. 직업요인과 환경요인···························································· 37 3. 장해에 대한 조기수용 정도················································ 38 4. 소득························································································· 38 제 3 절 자료의 수집 및 분석 방법····································39 1. 패널조사대상의 선정···························································· 39 2. 설문지 구성··········································································· 42 3. 분석방법················································································· 43
      • 제 4 장 통계분석 및 가설검증·································· 45 제 1 절 기초통계분석···························································45 1. 연구대상자의 일반적인 특성·············································· 45 2. 기술통계분석········································································· 46 제 2 절 측정도구의 타당성 및 신뢰성 검증····················49 1. 문항의 신뢰도 분석····························································· 49 2. 변수들간의 상관관계 분석·················································· 51 제 3 절 가설검증···································································52 1. 고정효과모형 및 성향점수매칭추정법 분석····················· 52 2. 직업복귀유형의 소득변화량에 대한 영향력 분석··········· 55 3. 장해에 대한 수용과 소득변화량에 대한 영향력 분석··· 60 4. 조절변수로서의 재활서비스 효과 분석···························· 61 제 4 절 해석 및 토론···························································63 1. 직업복귀유형과 객관적인 삶의 질···································· 63 2. 자아존중감, 자기효능감과 객관적인 삶의 질················· 66
      • 제 1 장 서론··································································· 1 제 1 절 연구의 배경 및 목적·············································· 1제 2 절 연구의 대상과 범위················································ 2제 3 절 연구의 방법····························································· 3제 2 장 이론적 논의 및 선행연구 검토···················· 4 제 1 절 산재노동자의 삶의 질············································ 4 1. 삶의 질 「객관적 지표」로서의 소득·································· 5 2. 삶의 질 「주관적 지표」로서의 자아존중감······················ 7 3. 삶의 질 「주관적 지표」로서의 자기효능감······················ 8 4. 자기효능감과 장해수용························································ 10 제 2 절 산재보험 재활사업과 직업복귀···························· 13 1. 산재보험 재활사업······························································· 13 2. 재활사업의 운영체계···························································· 14 3. 산재노동자 직업복귀···························································· 19 제 3 절 선행 연구의 검토··················································· 22 1. 취업영향요인으로서의 제도적 환경·································· 22 2. 산재장해인과 선천성 장해인의 차이점···························· 23 3. 재해이후 취업력에 영향을 주는 구체적 요인················· 24 4. 장해수용과 자기효능감 및 자아존중감과의 관계··········· 25 5. 선행연구와의 차별성···························································· 27
      • 제 3 장 연구설계························································· 31 제 1 절 연구모형 및 가설설정············································31 제 2 절 변수설정···································································33 1. 인적 요인··············································································· 37 2. 직업요인과 환경요인···························································· 37 3. 장해에 대한 조기수용 정도················································ 38 4. 소득························································································· 38 제 3 절 자료의 수집 및 분석 방법····································39 1. 패널조사대상의 선정···························································· 39 2. 설문지 구성··········································································· 42 3. 분석방법················································································· 43
      • 제 4 장 통계분석 및 가설검증·································· 45 제 1 절 기초통계분석···························································45 1. 연구대상자의 일반적인 특성·············································· 45 2. 기술통계분석········································································· 46 제 2 절 측정도구의 타당성 및 신뢰성 검증····················49 1. 문항의 신뢰도 분석····························································· 49 2. 변수들간의 상관관계 분석·················································· 51 제 3 절 가설검증···································································52 1. 고정효과모형 및 성향점수매칭추정법 분석····················· 52 2. 직업복귀유형의 소득변화량에 대한 영향력 분석··········· 55 3. 장해에 대한 수용과 소득변화량에 대한 영향력 분석··· 60 4. 조절변수로서의 재활서비스 효과 분석···························· 61 제 4 절 해석 및 토론···························································63 1. 직업복귀유형과 객관적인 삶의 질···································· 63 2. 자아존중감, 자기효능감과 객관적인 삶의 질················· 66
      • 제 5 장 결 론······························································· 68 제 1 절 요약···········································································68 제 2 절 재활서비스와 관련한 정책적 시사점··················69 1. 인적 요인··············································································· 37 2. 직업요인과 환경요인···························································· 37 3. 장해에 대한 조기수용 정도················································ 38 4. 소득························································································· 38 제 3 절 자료의 수집 및 분석 방법····································39 1. 패널조사대상의 선정···························································· 39 2. 설문지 구성··········································································· 42 3. 분석방법················································································· 43
      • 제 4 장 통계분석 및 가설검증·································· 45 제 1 절 기초통계분석···························································45 1. 연구대상자의 일반적인 특성·············································· 45 2. 기술통계분석········································································· 46 제 2 절 측정도구의 타당성 및 신뢰성 검증····················49 1. 문항의 신뢰도 분석····························································· 49 2. 변수들간의 상관관계 분석·················································· 51 제 3 절 가설검증···································································52 1. 고정효과모형 및 성향점수매칭추정법 분석····················· 52 2. 직업복귀유형의 소득변화량에 대한 영향력 분석··········· 55 3. 장해에 대한 수용과 소득변화량에 대한 영향력 분석··· 60 4. 조절변수로서의 재활서비스 효과 분석···························· 61 제 4 절 해석 및 토론···························································63 1. 직업복귀유형과 객관적인 삶의 질···································· 63 2. 자아존중감, 자기효능감과 객관적인 삶의 질················· 66
      • 제 5 장 결 론······························································· 68 제 1 절 요약···········································································68 제 2 절 재활서비스와 관련한 정책적 시사점··················69 1. 인적 요인··············································································· 37 2. 직업요인과 환경요인···························································· 37 3. 장해에 대한 조기수용 정도················································ 38 4. 소득························································································· 38 제 3 절 자료의 수집 및 분석 방법····································39 1. 패널조사대상의 선정···························································· 39 2. 설문지 구성··········································································· 42 3. 분석방법················································································· 43
      • 제 4 장 통계분석 및 가설검증·································· 45 제 1 절 기초통계분석···························································45 1. 연구대상자의 일반적인 특성·············································· 45 2. 기술통계분석········································································· 46 제 2 절 측정도구의 타당성 및 신뢰성 검증····················49 1. 문항의 신뢰도 분석····························································· 49 2. 변수들간의 상관관계 분석·················································· 51 제 3 절 가설검증···································································52 1. 고정효과모형 및 성향점수매칭추정법 분석····················· 52 2. 직업복귀유형의 소득변화량에 대한 영향력 분석··········· 55 3. 장해에 대한 수용과 소득변화량에 대한 영향력 분석··· 60 4. 조절변수로서의 재활서비스 효과 분석···························· 61 제 4 절 해석 및 토론···························································63 1. 직업복귀유형과 객관적인 삶의 질···································· 63 2. 자아존중감, 자기효능감과 객관적인 삶의 질················· 66
      • 제 5 장 결 론······························································· 68 제 1 절 요약···········································································68 제 2 절 재활서비스와 관련한 정책적 시사점··················69 제 3 절 연구의 한계 및 향후 과제····································75
      • 참고문헌·········································································77 Abstract ········································································92
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼