The culture of lifelong learning reflects the characteristics of an era and society, encapsulating the phenomenon of widespread lifelong learning. This concept has emerged as lifelong learning has become a universal social phenomenon, shaped by the co...
The culture of lifelong learning reflects the characteristics of an era and society, encapsulating the phenomenon of widespread lifelong learning. This concept has emerged as lifelong learning has become a universal social phenomenon, shaped by the contextual dynamics of the times. In the context of Korea, university lifelong education centers have contributed significantly to the formation of lifelong learning culture by providing learning opportunities for the entire population and expanding as a higher lifelong learning system within the framework of an aging society. This study identifies how university lifelong education centers, fulfilling their critical role in lifelong learning, have cultivated a unique social climate and fostered the development of a new culture of lifelong learning.
The research questions are as follows: First, to examine and identify the characteristics of the Institutional culture and organizational climate of S University's Lifelong Education Center. Second, to analyze the culture formed through interactions among instructors, learners, and staff, and to explore the cultural characteristics of lifelong learning based on these findings. Third, to investigate the unique cultural attributes of university lifelong education centers by examining lifelong learning culture through the lenses of organizational culture and climate.
This study focused on the Lifelong Education Center of S University in Busan. Using participant observation and interviews, it analyzed the center's regional and locational characteristics, as well as the lifelong learning culture exhibited in interactions among learners, instructors, and staff. The findings are as follows:
First, learners enhanced their self-directed learning attitudes through the Lifelong Education Center, using learning not only to gain knowledge but also to improve their quality of life. Examples such as "Living Wisely and Growing" and "Living as Learned" demonstrated their inner growth and self-reconstruction through learning.
Second, a nature-friendly learning environment provided psychological stability and emotional immersion for learners. Classrooms and learning spaces with abundant natural light enhanced a sense of engagement, and examples like "Learning on the Road" reflected learners' enthusiasm for learning. However, the "limitations of space" highlighted the need for improvements in the learning environment.
Third, interactions among learners, instructors, and staff fostered a culture of empathy, creating emotional bonds and social support within the learning community. Small group activities provided learners with a sense of belonging and emotional stability, while shared experiences strengthened communal bonds.
Fourth, the center’s unique location and spatial attributes held meanings beyond being mere educational spaces. These features provided learners with emotional stability and pride, forming a foundation for expanding the value of learning within the local community.
Based on the findings, the following recommendations are proposed:
First, since this study focused on S University's Lifelong Education Center, future research should explore learning cultures in lifelong education centers under various regional and environmental contexts.
Second, long-term observation is needed to understand the sustainability of lifelong learning culture, allowing for an analysis of changes in learners’ experiences and the lasting impact of learning culture on individuals and communities.
Third, a multidisciplinary approach is recommended to deeply analyze how learning spaces influence learners’ immersion and interactions, enriching the understanding of the multidimensional nature of lifelong learning culture.