As human beings and animals are distinguished from each other not in terms of difference, but in terms of discrimination, and humans are represented as belonging to a hierarchy higher than animals, humans who are no more than a category of animals are...
As human beings and animals are distinguished from each other not in terms of difference, but in terms of discrimination, and humans are represented as belonging to a hierarchy higher than animals, humans who are no more than a category of animals are placed on top of all animals. In particular, with the advent of modern society and capitalism, the life of animals has been thoroughly converted to the value of capital in the process of replacing life with monetary value by rearranging ‘life’ for rationality and profit. As a result, the rampant infectious diseases transmitted by animals nowadays sometimes turn into attacks on human society. It should be noted that the destruction of animals and animal nature is a prelude to the end and doom of life as a whole, and it is equivalent to the self-destruction of humans. In this respect, maintaining animals and animal nature is linked to the continuation of human life. Therefore, the researcher tries to explore in this study the relationship between animals and humans, elucidate and express the essential principles of human and animal life.
First, by examining ‘animal drawing’, which is the origin of art in general, this study aims to identify the fundamental nature of the primitive aesthetic expression before the beginning of art. Drawing an animal is something different from depicting an animal as an object outside of human beings. In other words, drawing animals is drawing human beings at the same time, and is far from superficially “reproducing” animals. For this reason, animal drawing can be seen as a visualization of opaque boundaries between humans and animals.
On the other hand, this paper examines some paintings of icons to illuminate the history that animals have been reduced to tools or functions for human beings in the process of the animal images transformed into the expression of sacredness. This paper also explores the abstract transformation as an expression of transcendence and examines its essential nature. This study aims to review the modern trends of representing animals and human beings that are intertwined with each other in various and complicated relationships in contemporary society, and endeavors to establish new coordinates of my drawing of animals. Drawing animals is in direct contact with the task of recalling the fundamental question, ‘What is painting?’ In order to expand the territory of painting, there is a need for an endless effort to get access to the reality like the invisible force that is not captured by our cursory observation. It means groping for possibilities to find other forms of power that is not subordinate to the current hierarchy of animals and human beings. It is an open-minded approach to animal nature, which would allow us to ponder over the circumstances of animals today and possible directions of intervention. Therefore, the approach to animal nature in painting makes it possible to look at the problem of society as a whole, not just the problem of animals. And this is a fundamental and intrinsic approach to the possibility of opening up alternative ways of life. In other words, if art is faithful to its inherent methods and bases itself on art itself or on the intrinsic nature of humanity, it is none other than to capture ‘animal nature’ as something fundamental.