RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      What movies show: Realism, perception and truth in film.

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T14489834

      • 저자
      • 발행사항

        [S.l.]: University of Pennsylvania 2016

      • 학위수여대학

        University of Pennsylvania Philosophy

      • 수여연도

        2016

      • 작성언어

        영어

      • 주제어
      • 학위

        Ph.D.

      • 페이지수

        189 p.

      • 지도교수/심사위원

        Adviser: Michael Weisberg.

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      소속기관이 구독 중이 아닌 경우 오후 4시부터 익일 오전 9시까지 원문보기가 가능합니다.

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Film-viewing is a unique aesthetic experience, and it seems to possess a unique sort of tension. On the one hand, a film's story seems to just be there before us: we're directly presented with sights and sounds and can perceive the objects, people, and places depicted in the same sort of way we perceive things in the world. On the other hand, there's an important sort of constructedness in film. Film-viewers have to cognize what's represented by a film's perceptual prompts; we have to bring our awareness of convention to understand shot-transitions and montage; and we have to extrapolate from what's shown in order to pick up on what's implied by the shots we see. These two aspects---perceptual immediacy and constructedness---seem opposed. And theorists typically treat them as opposed, with cinematic realists focusing on film's perceptual content, semioticians focusing on how movies communicate, and narrative theorists focusing on how we cognize a film's fiction, and each of them engaging in those analyses independent of the others. In this dissertation, I argue for nuanced ways in which what we see and hear, what we know, and what we imagine interact throughout film-viewing. I argue that film's perceptual content and representational content entwine insofar as we perceive a film's fictional world. I argue that because movies show (in ways that other art forms, like novels, cannot), they have an epistemic directness---they present their fictional truths immediately. I argue that movies communicate, in a roughly Gricean way, and that they do so partly through showing---with their perceptual content helping imply certain fictional truths. My analyses pave the way for a full theory of film meaning that does not treat as separate different, intertwining layers of meaning. I use and apply concepts from philosophy of perception, philosophy of language, and epistemology in order to clarify what precisely goes on when we watch movies and to motivate ties between philosophy of film and other areas of philosophy.
      번역하기

      Film-viewing is a unique aesthetic experience, and it seems to possess a unique sort of tension. On the one hand, a film's story seems to just be there before us: we're directly presented with sights and sounds and can perceive the objects, people, ...

      Film-viewing is a unique aesthetic experience, and it seems to possess a unique sort of tension. On the one hand, a film's story seems to just be there before us: we're directly presented with sights and sounds and can perceive the objects, people, and places depicted in the same sort of way we perceive things in the world. On the other hand, there's an important sort of constructedness in film. Film-viewers have to cognize what's represented by a film's perceptual prompts; we have to bring our awareness of convention to understand shot-transitions and montage; and we have to extrapolate from what's shown in order to pick up on what's implied by the shots we see. These two aspects---perceptual immediacy and constructedness---seem opposed. And theorists typically treat them as opposed, with cinematic realists focusing on film's perceptual content, semioticians focusing on how movies communicate, and narrative theorists focusing on how we cognize a film's fiction, and each of them engaging in those analyses independent of the others. In this dissertation, I argue for nuanced ways in which what we see and hear, what we know, and what we imagine interact throughout film-viewing. I argue that film's perceptual content and representational content entwine insofar as we perceive a film's fictional world. I argue that because movies show (in ways that other art forms, like novels, cannot), they have an epistemic directness---they present their fictional truths immediately. I argue that movies communicate, in a roughly Gricean way, and that they do so partly through showing---with their perceptual content helping imply certain fictional truths. My analyses pave the way for a full theory of film meaning that does not treat as separate different, intertwining layers of meaning. I use and apply concepts from philosophy of perception, philosophy of language, and epistemology in order to clarify what precisely goes on when we watch movies and to motivate ties between philosophy of film and other areas of philosophy.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼