Research on the Performance of Chinese Private SMEs from the Perspective of Leadership

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

ABSTRACT
The ability of enterprise leadership is the soul of the enterprise and the core element that determines the enterprise performance. The personal characteristics, management ability and professional ability of enterprise leaders play a vital role in the development of the enterprises. Based on the data of Chinese private small and medium-sized enterprises, the paper analyzes their leadership and enterprise performance through empirical research. Explore what kind of leadership people will succeed,what elements leaders need to have to improve business performance, and how there is the impact of the company’s life cycle on business performance. Analyzing the influence of multiple dimensions on the enterprise performance of leadership through interviews and issuing questionnaires, a quantitative analysis of the data obtained from the recycling questionnaire was conducted to find out the leadership elements that have a significant impact on the enterprise performance, and provide a theoretical basis for the research of this paper.
Therefore, this paper chooses the perspective of private enterprise performance research, by combining the current Chinese economic development environment and the background of dynamic changes, in different life cycles of the enterprises, to verify the influence of leader leadership on enterprise performance, and then by analyzing the factors that influence the leadership to get suggestions to guide enterprises so as to improve leadership to increase the level of enterprise performance. On this basis, this paper mainly studies and discusses the interrelationship between leadership, life cycle and enterprise performance, in which we put forward the following hypotheses: 1.Leadership is positively related to enterprise performance. 2.Laissez-faire leadership during the enterprise growth stage is positively related to enterprise performance. 3.Despotic leadership during enterprise prosperity stage is negatively related to enterprise performance. 4. Democratic leadership during the enterprise recession stage is negatively related to the enterprise performance. 5. Enterprise life cycle has a regulating effect on leadership affecting enterprise performance. To test the hypotheses, 500 valid questionnaires were issued, and 448 valid questionnaires were recovered. Through the reliability analysis, validity analysis test, descriptive statistics analysis, correlation statistics analysis and regression data statistics analysis that were performed on questionnaire statistics by SPSS25 & STATA16 system, and the analysis of 11 factors that influence the leadership, in which the indicators related to leadership can be obtained to help enterprise leaders find ways to improve leadership and promote the improvement of enterprise performance.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Catalogue
• I Introduction 1
• 1.1 Research background 1
• 1.2 Purpose and significance of the study 5
• 1.2.1 Study purpose 5
• 1.2.2 Study Significance 6
• 1.3 Research contents 8
• 1.4 Research technique 10
• 1.5 Research ideas and structure 11
• 1.6 Innovation in the paper 13
• II Theoretical Review 14
• 2.1 Relevant review of leadership and leadership 14
• 2.1.1 Conconnotation of leadership and leadership 14
• 2.1.2 Leadership-related research at home and abroad 17
• 2.1.3 Study on Leadership Related Theory 25
• 2.2 Review of related theoretical research on enterprise performance 42
• 2.2.1 The connotation of enterprise performance 42
• 2.2.2 Enterprise performance related research at home and abroad 44
• 2.2.3 Enterprise performance related theory 50
• 2.3 Review of lifecycle-related studies 57
• 2.3.1 Connotation of the life cycle 57
• 2.3.2 Life-cycle related studies at home and abroad 57
• 2.3.3 Study on life-cycle related theory 67
• 2.4 Chapter summary 72
• III Study the models and assumptions 73
• 3.1 Research model 73
• 3.2 Research hypothesis 75
• 3.2.1 The relationship between leadership and corporate performance 75
• 3.2.2 Analysis of the life cycle regulation mechanism on corporate performance leadership 77
• Ⅳ Measurement tools and inspection 92
• 4.1 Study variable measurements 92
• 4.1.1 Definition and measurement of leadership 92
• 4.1.2 Definition and measurement of enterprise performance 95
• 4.1.3 Measurement of the life cycle 95
• 4.2 Questionnaire design and selection of samples 99
• 4.2.1 Design and revision of the questionnaire 99
• 4.2.2 Sample selection criteria 100
• 4.3 Chapter summary 100
• V The data collection and evaluation 101
• 5.1 Collection of the data 101
• 5.1.1 Collection process of the questionnaire 101
• 5.1.2 Statistical analysis method 102
• 5.2 Characteristics of the sample 103
• 5.2.1 Sample enterprise characteristics 103
• 5.2.2 Human characteristics of the questionnaire filling out 104
• 5.2.3 Questionnaire data 105
• 5.3Data validity analysis 106
• 5.3.1 Reliability analysis 106
• 5.3.2 Analysis of volume validity of prediction questions 107
• 5.3.3 Principal component analysis 109
• 5.4 Chapter summary 112
• Ⅵ Assumption test and analysis 113
• 6.1 Correlation analysis 113
• 6.2 Benchmark regression results 115
• 6.2.1 Step by-step regression 115
• 6.2.2 Divided by sample regression 118
• 6.2.3 Analysis of the regulation of life cycle on leadership on enterprise performance 121
• 6.3 Analysis of the robustness 123
• 6.4 Importance analysis of competence in all dimensions of leadership 125
• 6.4.1 Correlation analysis 125
• 6.4.2 Regression analysis 127
• VII Study conclusions and outlook 129
• 7.1 The main conclusions of this study 129
• 7.1.1 Leadership has a great relationship to corporate performance 129
• 7.1.2 Choose the appropriate leadership behavior 129
• 7.1.3 To improve the ability of a number of individual leaders 130
• 7.2 Research limitations 134
• 7.3 Research prospect 135
• Reference documentation 143
• Appendix I 152
• Appendix II 158

참고문헌 (Reference)

1. .Leadershi p Baltimore.Penguin Books Inc -110.135, Gibb C.A, , 2019

2. .The essence of leadership.Shanghai People 's Publishing House, Anthony Keith, , 2007

3. Notes on the concept of commitment.American Journal of Sociology, Becker , H.S, 66, , 2009

4. .Commitment and social organization : a study of commitment mechanisms, Kanter , R.M, 33 ( 4 ) , 499- 517 ., , 1998

5. .Six major qualities of leadership ability.Enterprise Reform and Management, Ren Song, 12 ) , 12-13, , 2018

6. .Empirical StudyofLmx and Knowledge Employees.Scientific research management, Cengchuikai, 33 ( 10 ) , 8 ., , 2012

7. Management of Organizational Behavior ， Upper Saddle River ， N.J.Pearson Prentice Hall, Paul Hersey, ， ( 2 ) -008, , 2018

8. .An Analysis on the Loss of Human Resources in Small and micro Enterprises.Economic Research Guide, Diao ina, 000 ( 034 ), , 2019

9. Building Organizational Commitment : The Socialization of Manager in Work Organizations .Administrative ，1, Buchanan B ., 19 ), , 2014

10. Leadershi p，Managerial performance and 360-degree feedback.APPlied Psychology : An Intenational Review .47, Mann, , 2008

11. CongniriveResourceanLeadershipperformance.APPlied .psycholog y : AnIntenationalReview ,44Garcia-Morales , V.J., Fiedler, , 2015

12. .From transactional to transformational leade-rship : Learning to share the vision [ J ] .Organizational Dy-namics, Bass B M., ， ( 3 ) :19-32, , 1990

13. .John m.stevens , janice m.beyer , and harrison m.trice.assessing personal , role , and organizational predictors of managerial commitment.academy of management journal, None, 21 , 380-3964 ( 1 ) , 120-120 ., , 1999