RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      CAI 언어지도 프로그램의 입력방법에 따른 지적장애아의 입력속도와 정확도 = The Input Speed and Accuracy of Children with Intellectual Disabilities on the CAI Language Learning Program

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T11959337

      • 저자
      • 발행사항

        경산 : 대구대학교, 2010

      • 학위논문사항

        학위논문(석사) -- 대구대학교 특수교육대학원 , 특수교육학과 , 2010. 2

      • 발행연도

        2010

      • 작성언어

        한국어

      • 주제어
      • KDC

        379

      • 발행국(도시)

        경상북도

      • 기타서명

        The Input Speed and Accuracy of Children with Intellectual Disabilities on the CAI Language Learning Program

      • 형태사항

        51p ; 26cm

      • 일반주기명

        대구대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.
        지도교수:박찬웅
        참고문헌 : p.

      • 소장기관
        • 대구대학교 학술정보원 소장기관정보
      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This purpose of the study is to find out the input speed and accuracy of children with intellectual disabilities on the CAI language learning program. In so doing, twenty eight students from special school for the mentally retarded in Pusan were selected. Descriptive statistics were calculated to examine the differences resulting from input methods(mouse group, keyboard group). It was pre-tested intelligence test and Picture Vocabulary test and the results of pre-test were used Verify the homogeneity.
      Group A was using mouse on the program and group A was using keyboard on the program was independence variable and speed and accuracy was dependence Variables.

      The results of the experiment are as follows.

      First, it was found that it is more effective to use a keyboard than to use a mouse when it comes to the speed of input of children with intellectual disabilities. It meant that it is more effective to use a keyboard than to use a mouse on the CAI language learning program of children with intellectual disabilities.

      Second. it was found that it is same to use a keyboard and to use a mouse when it comes to the accuracy of input of children with intellectual disabilities.
      번역하기

      This purpose of the study is to find out the input speed and accuracy of children with intellectual disabilities on the CAI language learning program. In so doing, twenty eight students from special school for the mentally retarded in Pusan were selec...

      This purpose of the study is to find out the input speed and accuracy of children with intellectual disabilities on the CAI language learning program. In so doing, twenty eight students from special school for the mentally retarded in Pusan were selected. Descriptive statistics were calculated to examine the differences resulting from input methods(mouse group, keyboard group). It was pre-tested intelligence test and Picture Vocabulary test and the results of pre-test were used Verify the homogeneity.
      Group A was using mouse on the program and group A was using keyboard on the program was independence variable and speed and accuracy was dependence Variables.

      The results of the experiment are as follows.

      First, it was found that it is more effective to use a keyboard than to use a mouse when it comes to the speed of input of children with intellectual disabilities. It meant that it is more effective to use a keyboard than to use a mouse on the CAI language learning program of children with intellectual disabilities.

      Second. it was found that it is same to use a keyboard and to use a mouse when it comes to the accuracy of input of children with intellectual disabilities.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서론 1
      • 1. 연구의 의의 1
      • 2. 연구문제 3
      • 3. 용어의 정의 4
      • Ⅰ. 서론 1
      • 1. 연구의 의의 1
      • 2. 연구문제 3
      • 3. 용어의 정의 4
      • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 5
      • 1. 지적장애아와 CAI 5
      • 2. 지적장애아와 언어지도 10
      • Ⅲ. 연구 방법 15
      • 1. 대상 15
      • 2. 도구 16
      • 3. 절차 22
      • 4. 자료 처리 22
      • Ⅳ. 연구 결과 및 논의 24
      • 1. 입력속도 24
      • 2. 정확도 25
      • Ⅴ. 결론 및 제언 27
      • 1. 결론 27
      • 2. 제언 27
      • 참고 문헌 29
      • 영문 초록 36
      • 부록 38
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼