RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      행동성향 상황판단검사의 구성개념 타당화: 구조적 관계를 통한 타당도 검증 = Validation of behavior tendency situational judgment tests: Validity based on structural equation modeling

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T11043274

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      As Korean companies gradually adopt situational judgment test(“SJT”) as a method of selection tool, SJT is necessary to be validated. Traditionally, validity is classified into three categories; criterion-related validity, content-related validity and construct-related validity. However, AERA, APA & NCME (1999) adopted validity as one concept that is verified by evidences. Therefore, in this research, the validation of SJT is approached as two steps: passive validation approach and active validation approach. Passive validation approach is verified by component factor analysis and active validation approach is verified by relations with other variables based on measurement variables and theory variables.

      Regarding these two approaches, dependent variables are contextual performance and adaptive performance and independent variables are general mental ability and big five personalities. Situational judgment in university is validated with these variables.
      번역하기

      As Korean companies gradually adopt situational judgment test(“SJT”) as a method of selection tool, SJT is necessary to be validated. Traditionally, validity is classified into three categories; criterion-related validity, content-related validity...

      As Korean companies gradually adopt situational judgment test(“SJT”) as a method of selection tool, SJT is necessary to be validated. Traditionally, validity is classified into three categories; criterion-related validity, content-related validity and construct-related validity. However, AERA, APA & NCME (1999) adopted validity as one concept that is verified by evidences. Therefore, in this research, the validation of SJT is approached as two steps: passive validation approach and active validation approach. Passive validation approach is verified by component factor analysis and active validation approach is verified by relations with other variables based on measurement variables and theory variables.

      Regarding these two approaches, dependent variables are contextual performance and adaptive performance and independent variables are general mental ability and big five personalities. Situational judgment in university is validated with these variables.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • <목 차>
      • II. 서론 …………………………………………………………… 1
      • II. 이론적 배경 …………………………………………………… 3
      • III. 연구가설 …………………………………………………… 21
      • <목 차>
      • II. 서론 …………………………………………………………… 1
      • II. 이론적 배경 …………………………………………………… 3
      • III. 연구가설 …………………………………………………… 21
      • IV. 연구방법 …………………………………………………… 29
      • V.연구결과 ……………………………………………………… 37
      • VI. 종합논의 …………………………………………………… 60
      • 참 고 문 헌 ………………………………………………… 62
      • 부 록 …………………………………………………………… 70
      • ABSTRACT …………………………………………………… 83
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼