RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    국제사회의 대북 인권정책이 북한체제안보에 미치는 영향 : 한·미·일 북한인권법을 중심으로 = The Effects of North Korean Human Rights Policy in International Society on North Korea's System Security : Focus on North Korean Human Rights Acts in Korea, the U.S. and Japan

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T14719174

    • 저자
    • 발행사항

      광주 : 조선대학교 정책대학원, 2017

    • 학위논문사항

      학위논문(석사) -- 조선대학교 정책대학원 , 군사학과 , 2018. 2

    • 발행연도

      2017

    • 작성언어

      한국어

    • 주제어
    • DDC

      355.4 판사항(21)

    • 발행국(도시)

      광주

    • 형태사항

      76 p.: 26cm

    • 일반주기명

      조선대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.
      지도교수:김주삼
      참고문헌 : p. 71-76

    • UCI식별코드

      I804:24011-200000266576

    • 소장기관
      • 조선대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study speculated on the North Korean human rights that have been considered as one of recent important topics in international society. Human rights are basic rights to be guaranteed as humans and mean that no one is different according to nationalities, sex and ages. International society has to regulate such rights in international human rights regulations and member countries have to obey to the regulations.
    North Korea has maintained its totalitarian ruling system and since Kim Jeong-Eun regime started in 2011, it has been engaged in development of nuclear weapons and reinforced control of the people to establish a new political system, which caused human rights to deteriorate.
    Thus, members of international society adopted the U.N. resolution on North Korean human rights and enacted North Korean Human Rights Acts, and South Korea government also enacted the North Korean Human Rights Acts in 2016.
    In the situation that North Korea government strongly reacted to international society's efforts to facilitate human rights of North Koreans, considering the efforts as a strategy to collapse North Korea system, we have a question that “what has made the North Korean government react in North Korean Human Rights policy?” Although 10 years have passed since the UN adopted the North Korean Human Rights Resolution first in 2003 to facilitate human rights in North Korean people, its human rights have deteriorated further. Therefore, it was believed that we need studies on change factors in the North Korean government in respect to North Korean Human Rights Policy.
    Existing studies on North Korean human rights gave a focus on the North Korean human rights policy in the U.S. and Japan that have North Korean Human Rights Acts before South Korea, but they were confined to related organizations or human rights policies. Therefore, this study is to investigate what effects North Korean human rights policies in international society have on the North Korean system.
    It is expected that more effective North Korean human rights policy will be established based on influential factors on the North Korean system suggested by this study and bases for further studies on North Korean human right policies in international society will be prepared.
    This study used a literature review. As data access was limited because North Korea was conservative, this study referred to diverse data on North Korean human rights published by the Ministry of Unification, reports by international human rights organizations, and Internet data.
    This study has meaning in that it identified effects that North Korean Human Rights Acts in Korea, the U.S. and Japan had on the North Korean government politically, economically and socially in consideration of the North Korean system. If we develop the North Korean human right policy in consideration of the effects, it is expected that the North Korean government will be positively changed and North Koreans' human rights will be promoted.
    번역하기

    This study speculated on the North Korean human rights that have been considered as one of recent important topics in international society. Human rights are basic rights to be guaranteed as humans and mean that no one is different according to nation...

    This study speculated on the North Korean human rights that have been considered as one of recent important topics in international society. Human rights are basic rights to be guaranteed as humans and mean that no one is different according to nationalities, sex and ages. International society has to regulate such rights in international human rights regulations and member countries have to obey to the regulations.
    North Korea has maintained its totalitarian ruling system and since Kim Jeong-Eun regime started in 2011, it has been engaged in development of nuclear weapons and reinforced control of the people to establish a new political system, which caused human rights to deteriorate.
    Thus, members of international society adopted the U.N. resolution on North Korean human rights and enacted North Korean Human Rights Acts, and South Korea government also enacted the North Korean Human Rights Acts in 2016.
    In the situation that North Korea government strongly reacted to international society's efforts to facilitate human rights of North Koreans, considering the efforts as a strategy to collapse North Korea system, we have a question that “what has made the North Korean government react in North Korean Human Rights policy?” Although 10 years have passed since the UN adopted the North Korean Human Rights Resolution first in 2003 to facilitate human rights in North Korean people, its human rights have deteriorated further. Therefore, it was believed that we need studies on change factors in the North Korean government in respect to North Korean Human Rights Policy.
    Existing studies on North Korean human rights gave a focus on the North Korean human rights policy in the U.S. and Japan that have North Korean Human Rights Acts before South Korea, but they were confined to related organizations or human rights policies. Therefore, this study is to investigate what effects North Korean human rights policies in international society have on the North Korean system.
    It is expected that more effective North Korean human rights policy will be established based on influential factors on the North Korean system suggested by this study and bases for further studies on North Korean human right policies in international society will be prepared.
    This study used a literature review. As data access was limited because North Korea was conservative, this study referred to diverse data on North Korean human rights published by the Ministry of Unification, reports by international human rights organizations, and Internet data.
    This study has meaning in that it identified effects that North Korean Human Rights Acts in Korea, the U.S. and Japan had on the North Korean government politically, economically and socially in consideration of the North Korean system. If we develop the North Korean human right policy in consideration of the effects, it is expected that the North Korean government will be positively changed and North Koreans' human rights will be promoted.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 제1장 서론 ······························································· 1
    • 제1절 연구목적 ························································· 1
    • 제2절 연구범위와 방법 ················································ 3
    • 1. 연구범위 ···························································· 3
    • 2. 연구방법 ···························································· 3
    • 제1장 서론 ······························································· 1
    • 제1절 연구목적 ························································· 1
    • 제2절 연구범위와 방법 ················································ 3
    • 1. 연구범위 ···························································· 3
    • 2. 연구방법 ···························································· 3
    • 제3절 선행연구 ························································· 5
    • 제2장 이론적 고찰 ···················································· 7
    • 제1절 인권의 개념 ····················································· 7
    • 1. 인권의 정의와 특성 ··············································· 7
    • 2. 인권개념의 역사적 변천 ·········································· 8
    • 제2절 국제인권규범과 형성 ··········································· 11
    • 1. 국제인권규범의 형성 배경 ······································· 11
    • 2. 국제인권규범 ······················································ 12
    • 제3절 북한사회주의 ····················································· 15
    • 1. 북한사회주의 특성 ················································ 15
    • 2. 수령과 영도문화 ··················································· 16
    • 3. 사회통제구조 ··················································· 17
    • 제3장 북한의 인권 개념과 실태 ································ 21
    • 제1절 북한의 인권 ······················································ 21
    • 1. 대내적 인식 ························································ 21
    • 2. 대외적 인식 ························································ 24
    • 제2절 북한의 인권 실태 ··············································· 26
    • 1. 시민적·정치적 권리침해 ·········································· 28
    • 2. 경제적·사회적·문화적 권리침해 ································· 38
    • 3. 북한 인권 시사점 ·················································· 45
    • 제4장 국제사회의 대북 인권정책 ·································· 46
    • 제1절 미국의 북한인권법과 대북 인권정책 ······················· 46
    • 1. 미국의 북한인권법 ················································ 46
    • 2. 미국의 대북 인권정책 ············································ 48
    • 제2절 일본의 북한인권법과 대북 인권정책 ······················· 51
    • 1. 일본의 북한인권법 ················································ 51
    • 2. 일본의 대북 인권정책 ············································ 52
    • 제3절 한국의 북한인권법과 대북 인권정책 ······················· 54
    • 1. 한국의 북한인권법 ················································ 54
    • 2. 한국의 대북 인권정책 ············································ 55
    • 제5장 한·미·일 북한인권법이 북한 정권에
    • 미치는 영향 요인
    • ····················· 60
    • 제1절 정치적 요인 ······················································ 60
    • 제2절 경제적 요인 ······················································ 63
    • 제3절 사회적 요인 ······················································ 65
    • 제6장 결론 ······························································· 67
    • 참고문헌 ···································································· 71
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼