RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      신명기 역사서와 역대기 역사서의 신학사상 비교 연구 : 법궤운반과 성전건축 전승을 중심으로 = A Comparative Study on Theology between the Deuteronomistic History and the Chronicler’s History : with priority given to the transport of the ark of the covenant

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T13433799

      • 저자
      • 발행사항

        화성 : 협성대학교 신학대학원, 2012

      • 학위논문사항

        학위논문(석사) -- 협성대학교 신학대학원 , 신학과 구약학 , 2012. 8

      • 발행연도

        2012

      • 작성언어

        한국어

      • 발행국(도시)

        경기도

      • 형태사항

        115 p. ; 26 cm

      • 일반주기명

        지도교수: 박해령

      • 소장기관
        • 협성대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      ABSTRACT

      A Comparative Study on Theology between the Deuteronomistic History and the Chronicler’s History:
      with priority given to the transport of the ark of the covenant
      and temple construction


      Jeong, Da Woon
      Dept. of Theology
      Graduate School
      Hyupsung University


      There are largely two different flows in the Old Testament. One is the Deuteronomistic history, and the other is the Chronicler’s history. The huge amount of materials of the two are records of Israel history made by Israelites themselves. The two history books are overlapped in large part, but they described the same incidents from a different perspective and in a different literary style. It indicates that the writers of the two history books described the history from their own unique viewpoint and from a different theological standpoint. It’s required to look into the contemporary circumstances of the times when the two history books were written in order to have a profound understanding of the history books.
      A method of historical criticism was employed in this study. Chapter 2 dealt with the theological thought of the historians, involving the age of their activities, contemporary background, goal of recording and theological themes. Chapter 3 covered the transportation of the ark of the covenant. The meaning and background of the ark of the covenant were discussed, and the book of Samuel and the book of Chronicles were compared in terms of that. Chapter 4 looked into the construction of the temple. The meaning of temple construction was briefly described, and the book of Samuel and the book of Chronicles were compared as well in terms of that by focusing on David and Solomon. Chapter 5 reached a conclusion.
      The ark of the covenant and the temple are symbols of God’s presence, and they were especially important for David. Therefore, it’s very important to transport the ark of the covenant to get it back, and building the temple was very important as well. When the texts of the books were compared, it’s found that the historian who wrote the book of Chronicles described David as a devout and ideal king and proved how much he was God-centered.
      번역하기

      ABSTRACT A Comparative Study on Theology between the Deuteronomistic History and the Chronicler’s History: with priority given to the transport of the ark of the covenant and temple construction Jeong, Da Woon Dept. of Theology Graduate...

      ABSTRACT

      A Comparative Study on Theology between the Deuteronomistic History and the Chronicler’s History:
      with priority given to the transport of the ark of the covenant
      and temple construction


      Jeong, Da Woon
      Dept. of Theology
      Graduate School
      Hyupsung University


      There are largely two different flows in the Old Testament. One is the Deuteronomistic history, and the other is the Chronicler’s history. The huge amount of materials of the two are records of Israel history made by Israelites themselves. The two history books are overlapped in large part, but they described the same incidents from a different perspective and in a different literary style. It indicates that the writers of the two history books described the history from their own unique viewpoint and from a different theological standpoint. It’s required to look into the contemporary circumstances of the times when the two history books were written in order to have a profound understanding of the history books.
      A method of historical criticism was employed in this study. Chapter 2 dealt with the theological thought of the historians, involving the age of their activities, contemporary background, goal of recording and theological themes. Chapter 3 covered the transportation of the ark of the covenant. The meaning and background of the ark of the covenant were discussed, and the book of Samuel and the book of Chronicles were compared in terms of that. Chapter 4 looked into the construction of the temple. The meaning of temple construction was briefly described, and the book of Samuel and the book of Chronicles were compared as well in terms of that by focusing on David and Solomon. Chapter 5 reached a conclusion.
      The ark of the covenant and the temple are symbols of God’s presence, and they were especially important for David. Therefore, it’s very important to transport the ark of the covenant to get it back, and building the temple was very important as well. When the texts of the books were compared, it’s found that the historian who wrote the book of Chronicles described David as a devout and ideal king and proved how much he was God-centered.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 목 차
      • 제1장 서론 …………………………………………………………………………… 1
      • 1. 연구의 목적 …………………………………………………………………… 1
      • 2. 연구 내용의 범위와 방법 ……………………………………………… 2
      • 목 차
      • 제1장 서론 …………………………………………………………………………… 1
      • 1. 연구의 목적 …………………………………………………………………… 1
      • 2. 연구 내용의 범위와 방법 ……………………………………………… 2
      • 제2장 신명기역사가와 역대기역사가의 신학 사상 ……………………… 4
      • 1. 신명기 역사가의 신학사상 ……………………………………………… 4
      • 1)신명기 역사서 …………………………………………………………… 4
      • 2)신명기 역사가의 시대적 배경과 기록목적 …………………… 11
      • 3)신명기 역사가의 신학사상 …………………………………………… 14
      • 2. 역대기 역사가의 신학사상 …………………………………………… 22
      • 1)역대기 역사서 …………………………………………………………… 22
      • 2)역대기 역사가의 시대적 배경과 기록목적 …………………… 26
      • 3)역대기 역사가의 신학사상 …………………………………………… 36
      • 제3장 법궤 운반전승에 대한 비교 분석 ………………………………… 63
      • 1. 법궤 …………………………………………………………………………… 63
      • 2. 법궤의 명칭 ………………………………………………………………… 64
      • 3. “법궤이야기”의 연구 ……………………………………………………… 64
      • 4. 법궤의 운반 보도의 비교 분석 ……………………………………… 65
      • 5. 신학적 결론 ………………………………………………………………… 83
      • 제4장 성전건축 전승에 대한 비교 분석 ……………………………… 85
      • 1. 성전 ………………………………………………………………………… 85
      • 2. 다윗의 성전 건축 준비 ……………………………………………… 86
      • 3. 솔로몬의 성전 건축 ……………………………………………………… 92
      • 4. 레위인의 역할 ……………………………………………………………… 97
      • 5. 신학적 결론 ……………………………………………………………… 100
      • 제5장 결 론 ……………………………………………………………………… 105
      • 참고문헌 ……………………………………………………………………………… 109
      • ABSTRACT
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼