RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      敎育環境權에 관한 硏究 : 敎育 外的 環境을 中心으로 = (A) Study on the Right to Educational Environment

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T10476646

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This study as the research field in the administrative law comes to be expanded, the theory and attempt has been suggested and made plentifully in the branch of environmental law to widen the scope of the object which can be the utmost protection of the fundamental rights.
      From like this background, we must not be satisfied with the current law regarding environmental right and Right to Educational Environment.
      Hereafter subject is the left shares of the person who study this environmental law.
      The purpose of this study is to find out the variety of realizable methods that is adequate for Korea legislation and to go further toward the utmost protection of the fundamental rights than ever before, which can be accomplished not only by analysing the theories and the judicial precedents regarding the above-disputed points but also making comparative analysis on the related law.
      In the end, as mentioned above, the conclusion of this thesis merely the transient completion.
      In spite of the complex circumstances resulting from the matter on Educational Environment, there has been few studies in detail.
      hence, the research on the plan to realize Right to Educational Environment and to relieve the infringement of Educational Environment should be activated vividly.
      I would like to make the end of this relatively voluminous thesis with resolution toward myself on the ceaseless study in these attractive realm.
      번역하기

      This study as the research field in the administrative law comes to be expanded, the theory and attempt has been suggested and made plentifully in the branch of environmental law to widen the scope of the object which can be the utmost protection of t...

      This study as the research field in the administrative law comes to be expanded, the theory and attempt has been suggested and made plentifully in the branch of environmental law to widen the scope of the object which can be the utmost protection of the fundamental rights.
      From like this background, we must not be satisfied with the current law regarding environmental right and Right to Educational Environment.
      Hereafter subject is the left shares of the person who study this environmental law.
      The purpose of this study is to find out the variety of realizable methods that is adequate for Korea legislation and to go further toward the utmost protection of the fundamental rights than ever before, which can be accomplished not only by analysing the theories and the judicial precedents regarding the above-disputed points but also making comparative analysis on the related law.
      In the end, as mentioned above, the conclusion of this thesis merely the transient completion.
      In spite of the complex circumstances resulting from the matter on Educational Environment, there has been few studies in detail.
      hence, the research on the plan to realize Right to Educational Environment and to relieve the infringement of Educational Environment should be activated vividly.
      I would like to make the end of this relatively voluminous thesis with resolution toward myself on the ceaseless study in these attractive realm.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 目次
      • Ⅰ. 序論 = 1
      • 1. 硏究의 必要性과 目的 = 1
      • 2. 硏究의 範圍와 方法 = 2
      • Ⅱ. 環境權과 敎育環境權의 法的 性格 = 4
      • 目次
      • Ⅰ. 序論 = 1
      • 1. 硏究의 必要性과 目的 = 1
      • 2. 硏究의 範圍와 方法 = 2
      • Ⅱ. 環境權과 敎育環境權의 法的 性格 = 4
      • 1. 環境權과 敎育環境權의 槪念 = 4
      • 2. 環境權과 敎育環境權의 法的 性格 = 5
      • 3. 有似槪念과의 區別 = 13
      • (1) 社會的·文化的·歷史的環境 = 13
      • (2) 生活環境·學敎環境 = 16
      • (3) 環境敎育 = 18
      • (4) 敎育行政(法) = 19
      • 4. 敎育環境權에 관한 外國의 實態 = 21
      • (1) 美國 = 22
      • (2) 日本 = 26
      • Ⅲ. 敎育環境權의 內容 = 28
      • 1. 敎育環境의 外的 類型 = 28
      • (1) 靑少年有害環境·學校有害環境 = 28
      • (2) 學校騷音·日照權·眺望權 및 景觀權 = 33
      • (3) 敎育環境汚染排除·敎育環境造成請求權 = 35
      • 2. 憲法規定에 의한 敎育環境權 = 35
      • 3. 敎育環境權의 有害實態 = 37
      • Ⅳ. 敎育環境權의 效力 = 44
      • 1. 敎育環境權의 根據와 主體 = 44
      • (1) 根據 = 44
      • (2) 主體 = 45
      • 2. 敎育環境權의 效力 = 49
      • (1) 國家的 效力 = 49
      • (2) 私人間의 效力 = 50
      • Ⅴ. 結論 = 51
      • 參考文獻 = 55
      • ABSTRACT = 57
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼