RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      조선시대 부안김씨가의 재산형성과 분재 양상 연구

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T15072294

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The writer took a diachronic view of the process of wealth amassment and the method of division of property based on Uban Buan Kim’s family’s records of property inheritance and property-related documents that were produced between the 16th and 18th centuries.

      In the 16th century, Uban Buan Kim’s family was followed by Kim Seokpil-Kim Gae-Kim Gyeongsun. Kim Seokpil is a figure who increased the price by passing the state examination in the early 16th century. He, at the same time, laid the foundation of the family fortune. His son, Kim Gae, built a tile-roofed house in Imsil, and also reclaimed about 100 islands by building up brick walls rivers nearby the wasteland. Kim Gyeongsun expanded its scale by purchasing and reclaiming the land nearby by building up brick walls in Yongdam, the upper region of the Guem River. Also, about 30 gyeol(結) of mud flats in Julpo, Buan were received and operated as a farmland and sea farm by building an embankment. In the 16th century, Uban Buan Kim’s family formed its property through reclamation.

      During the Japanese Invasion of Korea in the 17th century, Kim Hongwon sent Uigok(義穀) to the King’s temporary quarters, and during the second invasion, he carried out active civilian army activities and entered into politics by successfully defeating the Japanese army in places including Sunchang and Suncheon. Kim Hongwon did not neglect his efforts to protect and increase his family’s property. After the Japanese Invasion, he actively attempted to restore the lost Imsil and Yongdam-hyeon farms, and purchased the large tracts of land in Uban-dong in 1634. At this time, he laid the foundation in Uban-dong for generations. The division of property was Namnyeopyeonggyunbunjep(男女平均分執)

      Kim Myeongyeol and Kim Beon established the principle of division of property. According to the clan rules, the memorial service was performed by sons, and daughters who did not participate in the memorial service were given only 1/3 of the property for sons. In addition, the land in Uban-dong was inherited only to sons to promote the formation of lineage village. In other words, the wealth and memorial services were concentrated on sons. Meanwhile, the means of increasing property has been changed from reclamation to purchase.

      After Kim Beon, the lineage of Uban Buan Kim’s family continued with the foster son Kim Sujong(Banggil)-Kim Deukmun-Kim Jeongha. Although the legitimacy of the family was maintained through this process, it caused the problem that the family’s property or personal connections were not fully conveyed to future generations. Kim Deukmun’s Uban-dong property that was divided by ancestors has been reassembled as he inherited the property from both his foster and biological fathers. Kim Jeongha is a descendent of Sajikgongpa. When he was ostracized by his relatives, his hometown moved to Ongjeong-ri. Later, his descendants experienced issues related to return of purchase as they moved back to Uban-dong.
      At that time, the wealth inheritance was concentrated on the eldest son, and after Kim Jeongha, the method that the property was controlled by the eldest son had been confirmed.

      Such the wealth amassment and division of property by Uban Buan Kim’s family could ascertain the fact that they made constant efforts to maintain their status and economic power of rural noble family. It is expected that such an analysis provides more access to the actual society of the day.
      번역하기

      The writer took a diachronic view of the process of wealth amassment and the method of division of property based on Uban Buan Kim’s family’s records of property inheritance and property-related documents that were produced between the 16th and 18...

      The writer took a diachronic view of the process of wealth amassment and the method of division of property based on Uban Buan Kim’s family’s records of property inheritance and property-related documents that were produced between the 16th and 18th centuries.

      In the 16th century, Uban Buan Kim’s family was followed by Kim Seokpil-Kim Gae-Kim Gyeongsun. Kim Seokpil is a figure who increased the price by passing the state examination in the early 16th century. He, at the same time, laid the foundation of the family fortune. His son, Kim Gae, built a tile-roofed house in Imsil, and also reclaimed about 100 islands by building up brick walls rivers nearby the wasteland. Kim Gyeongsun expanded its scale by purchasing and reclaiming the land nearby by building up brick walls in Yongdam, the upper region of the Guem River. Also, about 30 gyeol(結) of mud flats in Julpo, Buan were received and operated as a farmland and sea farm by building an embankment. In the 16th century, Uban Buan Kim’s family formed its property through reclamation.

      During the Japanese Invasion of Korea in the 17th century, Kim Hongwon sent Uigok(義穀) to the King’s temporary quarters, and during the second invasion, he carried out active civilian army activities and entered into politics by successfully defeating the Japanese army in places including Sunchang and Suncheon. Kim Hongwon did not neglect his efforts to protect and increase his family’s property. After the Japanese Invasion, he actively attempted to restore the lost Imsil and Yongdam-hyeon farms, and purchased the large tracts of land in Uban-dong in 1634. At this time, he laid the foundation in Uban-dong for generations. The division of property was Namnyeopyeonggyunbunjep(男女平均分執)

      Kim Myeongyeol and Kim Beon established the principle of division of property. According to the clan rules, the memorial service was performed by sons, and daughters who did not participate in the memorial service were given only 1/3 of the property for sons. In addition, the land in Uban-dong was inherited only to sons to promote the formation of lineage village. In other words, the wealth and memorial services were concentrated on sons. Meanwhile, the means of increasing property has been changed from reclamation to purchase.

      After Kim Beon, the lineage of Uban Buan Kim’s family continued with the foster son Kim Sujong(Banggil)-Kim Deukmun-Kim Jeongha. Although the legitimacy of the family was maintained through this process, it caused the problem that the family’s property or personal connections were not fully conveyed to future generations. Kim Deukmun’s Uban-dong property that was divided by ancestors has been reassembled as he inherited the property from both his foster and biological fathers. Kim Jeongha is a descendent of Sajikgongpa. When he was ostracized by his relatives, his hometown moved to Ongjeong-ri. Later, his descendants experienced issues related to return of purchase as they moved back to Uban-dong.
      At that time, the wealth inheritance was concentrated on the eldest son, and after Kim Jeongha, the method that the property was controlled by the eldest son had been confirmed.

      Such the wealth amassment and division of property by Uban Buan Kim’s family could ascertain the fact that they made constant efforts to maintain their status and economic power of rural noble family. It is expected that such an analysis provides more access to the actual society of the day.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서론 1
      • 1. 연구 목적 및 필요성 1
      • 2. 선행 연구 검토 4
      • 3. 연구대상과 방법 8
      • Ⅰ. 서론 1
      • 1. 연구 목적 및 필요성 1
      • 2. 선행 연구 검토 4
      • 3. 연구대상과 방법 8
      • Ⅱ. 16세기 재산형성 과정 11
      • 1. 김석필의 전래 재산 12
      • 2. 김개의 임실 축보작답 21
      • 3. 김경순의 용담과 줄포의 개간 25
      • Ⅲ. 17세기 초 우반동 재산형성 43
      • 1. 입사 이전의 가산과 의병활동 44
      • 2. 관직생활과 재산상속 53
      • 3. 낙향 후 우반동 토지매득 62
      • Ⅳ. 17세기 중후반 분재 원칙의 정립과 보완 71
      • 1. 김명열의 재산 상속과 증식 72
      • 2. 남녀차등 상속 및 동성마을 형성의 대원칙 85
      • 3. 김번의 세부원칙 보완 90
      • Ⅴ. 18세기 초 가문의 위기와 재산 수호 107
      • 1. 김수종의 전래재산과 증식 108
      • 2. 재산분쟁과 무신란 연루 사건 114
      • 3. 장자 집중 상속 및 제위조의 확대 119
      • Ⅵ. 18세기 후반 재산 분쟁과 쇠퇴 127
      • 1. 김득문의 전래문서 정리 128
      • 2. 김정하의 옹정리 이거 139
      • 3. 우반동으로 귀환 152
      • Ⅶ. 결론 158
      • 〔부록〕 167
      • 〔참고 문헌〕 182
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1. 부안 우반 부안김씨 고문서 역주, 안승준, 한국학중앙연구원, , 2017

      2. 형제간에 자식을 서로 맞바꾼 1688년 金璠의 分財記, 문숙자, 문헌과 해석사, 문헌과 해 석9, , 1999

      1. 부안 우반 부안김씨 고문서 역주, 안승준, 한국학중앙연구원, , 2017

      2. 형제간에 자식을 서로 맞바꾼 1688년 金璠의 分財記, 문숙자, 문헌과 해석사, 문헌과 해 석9, , 1999

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼