韓半島 周邊 4强의 新國防政策과 韓國의 安保에 관한 硏究

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The Korea's national security problems are now get complicated with the signs of hegemonism by the neighboring nations such as Japan, China and U.S., Russia's efforts to survive the military power and efforts to seize the supremacy by America.
Since the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks in the U.S, the war against terrorism which imperialists had announced to "Al-qaeda" was going fully underway and U.S. President George W. Bush announced in the beginning of year that the year 2002 will be the called "the year of war."
With the relentless bloodshed between the Israel and Palestine Liberation Organization, another region-wide conflict is looming over the Middle East. These trends are swept over the lots of countries. It maybe hasty conclusion that international dispute will be ends as soon as possible when we considering the war against terrorism lead by U.S.
What is more, the powers of the world strategy has fundamentally changed since the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks in the U.S. As a result, the relationship between the powers of the world are very important influence to northeast asia's security problems.
It was likely that a series of event such as June 15 declaration, family reunion and ongoing sunshine policy of engaging North Korea were create reconciliation mood between the two Koreas.
However, there are constant disputes to the disconnected policy of the North with the abovementioned changes. There are also tendencies that the youth who has ever experienced the war think the national security problem very easily and interpret it in a literal sense.
Therefore, this research examine the meaning and changes of national security problem. The principal big power nation's security policy to other nation and their native security policy are also considered in this issue. It is broaden when this research not only examine the changes security policies of a big powers but also inspect the sunshine policy of North Korea. So, this study narrow the subjects down to the strategic military purposes and the peninsula's security issues.
The conclusion is that Korea's national safety is based on cooperation between the neighboring nation. To get this goal, It is necessary to further an independent security policy as well as friendly relationship between two Koreas and final purpose should be point to unification.
The "sunshine policy" toward North Korea was initially characterized as a decades-long strategy for reunification to be carried out not only by the initiating Kim Dae-jung administration but also by subsequent South Korean governments as a rational choice. With this efforts, this incumbent government are gained amicable opportunity from the relations with a series of achievement like Mt. Kumgang tourism, dispersed family reunion, summit talks. It is true that South Korea made all of efforts to get an intimacy with North Korea.
Wrongly, the "sunshine policy" assumed that the North was prepared to open its closed doors if induced by warm assistance and engage in earnest negotiations for unification.
Unfortunately, the advent of a hard-line policy to Pyongyang in the United States after the 9.11 terror give trouble to South Korea that relations between the two countries will encounter many obstacles and can not easily come close together.
Especially, Bush reaffirmed his hard-line stance toward North Korea with the announcement "axis of evil", consider the North Korea connecting with terrorism. His comment aroused worries in the South about the possibility that the North would become the next target of Washington's war against terrorism.
In here, we can get some knowledge that if the powers of the world like U.S, Japan, Russia including China will not helping hand to the two Koreas peace, it will be ends with an empty unification promise.
Also after September 11 terror, we remember that America tried gain the popularity from lot's of nations which carry out 'the war against terrorism'. What does that mean? when America, The only one strong state in the world, carry out a foreign policy, they try to gain mutual understanding from the other strong states and pursuit multi cooperation security. Of course during the situation America contrast with the other nations is that America leading the cooperation security.
Still more relationship of the circumference powerful countries is tied inside Korean Peninsula, we have to effort for the cooperative security of multi one, have not to effort lazily. Nevertheless like this effort when our national power will be extended and the right to speak is strengthened at the international, we will be able to solve a Korean Peninsula security problem with the direction where we want to be.
Finally we pursuing peaceful unity based on democracy method. More further the prosperity which is a desire of the nation is a possibility of doing. But, current south and north problem is not optimism intelligence. Our government being even in efforts, North Korea as ever does not throwaway the ambition which is a military force communization unity like past. Consequently, did not undergo the pain of warfare generations judge the intention of North Korea level-headedly and we caution south strategy of North Korea.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 목차 = 1
• 제1장 서론 = 5
• 제1절 연구의 목적 = 5
• 제2절 연구의 범위 및 방법 = 7
• 제2장 국가안보에 관한 일반이론 = 9
• 제1절 국가안보의 개념 = 9
• 1. 전통적 국가안보 개념 = 9
• 2. 협의의 국가안보 개념 = 11
• 3. 광의의 국가안보 개념 = 14
• 제2절 국가안보 일반이론 = 17
• 1. 국가안보에 관한 제접근법 = 17
• 2. 총체적 안보론 = 21
• 제3장 주변 강대국의 신 국방정책 = 25
• 제1절 미국 = 25
• 1. 21세기 안보환경 변화 = 25
• 2. 미국의 신 국방정책 = 29
• 제2절 일본 = 33
• 1. 21세기 안보환경 변화 = 33
• 2. 일본의 신국방정책 = 40
• 제3절 중국 = 43
• 1. 21세기 안보환경 변화 = 43
• 2. 중국의 신 국방정책 = 45
• 제4절 러시아 = 48
• 1. 21세기 안보환경 변화 = 48
• 2. 러시아의 신 국방정책 = 50
• 제4장 한국의 국가안보정책 방향 = 57
• 제1절 한국의 국가안보정책 분석 = 57
• 1. 북한의 군사위협 = 57
• 2. 한국의 안보정책 변화 = 64
• 3. 남·북한의 미래전력 구상 = 69
• 제2절 한국의 안보정책 방향 = 70
• 1. 다자간 협력안보정책 추구 = 70
• 2. 자주적 국가안보 역량 배양 = 78
• 3. 남·북 관계개선과 평화체제공존의 구조확립 = 82
• 제5장 결론 = 92
• 참고문헌 = 94
• ABSTRACT = 97