RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      인터넷 자원 평가요소에 관한 연구

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T8546888

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The increase of digital collection and the appearance of digital library make Internet resources as important information resource of library. It also raises discussions about the development, preservation, and use of Internet resources as a part of library collections.
      Internet resources are easy to publish and circulate. At the same time, they also have some problems in terms of its content, construction, and utilization. Restrictions in information selection and utilization is one example because useful Internet resources are exist as mixed with untested resources. Therefore, librarians need some objective factors in evaluating Internet resources for the selection of information materials at the dimension of library collection development.
      The main purpose of this study is to evaluate Internet resources and select a useful its resources in library collection.
      This study suggests the following evaluation factors for the selection of such a Internet resources.
      1) Content Quality evaluation factors: Although the construction method of Internet resources interconnect text resources and audio-visual resources, and although it is more fresh than conventional printed materials, the content of resources is still the most important factor in determining the value of resources.
      2) Service quality evaluation factors: Library services, regardless of the quality of content, will be rejected if users are uncomfortable in using the services. Therefore, the improvement of user environments is important to enhance the value of resource utilization.
      3) Policy evaluation factors: There can be many factors to achieve the goals of a library. Such factors will be the policy evaluation factors and they should be considered in library development plan. Therefore, policy evaluation based on user needs is essential.
      In this study, evaluation is made by the experimental application of Internet environments on the practically selected factors. As evaluation method, evaluation factors are scaled and points are imposed on each item. Five points scale was used on the base of adaptability of the evaluation factors as the point imposing method. Excellent Internet resources were selected by imposing points on calculated evaluation index and by the standard points set by a library.
      Until these days, libraries and information service institutions could not perform systemic collection of resources because they have no selection criteria, although they feel the necessity of Internet resources. The result of this study will be utilized as the guidelines for resource development as well as that of Internet resource development.
      Expected utilities of this study are
      1) to provide basic guidelines in developing Internet resources into collections.
      2) to provide infrastructure which enable library to comprise network information and Internet resources as collections.
      3) to provide the guidelines in developing collection of electronic library.
      번역하기

      The increase of digital collection and the appearance of digital library make Internet resources as important information resource of library. It also raises discussions about the development, preservation, and use of Internet resources as a part of l...

      The increase of digital collection and the appearance of digital library make Internet resources as important information resource of library. It also raises discussions about the development, preservation, and use of Internet resources as a part of library collections.
      Internet resources are easy to publish and circulate. At the same time, they also have some problems in terms of its content, construction, and utilization. Restrictions in information selection and utilization is one example because useful Internet resources are exist as mixed with untested resources. Therefore, librarians need some objective factors in evaluating Internet resources for the selection of information materials at the dimension of library collection development.
      The main purpose of this study is to evaluate Internet resources and select a useful its resources in library collection.
      This study suggests the following evaluation factors for the selection of such a Internet resources.
      1) Content Quality evaluation factors: Although the construction method of Internet resources interconnect text resources and audio-visual resources, and although it is more fresh than conventional printed materials, the content of resources is still the most important factor in determining the value of resources.
      2) Service quality evaluation factors: Library services, regardless of the quality of content, will be rejected if users are uncomfortable in using the services. Therefore, the improvement of user environments is important to enhance the value of resource utilization.
      3) Policy evaluation factors: There can be many factors to achieve the goals of a library. Such factors will be the policy evaluation factors and they should be considered in library development plan. Therefore, policy evaluation based on user needs is essential.
      In this study, evaluation is made by the experimental application of Internet environments on the practically selected factors. As evaluation method, evaluation factors are scaled and points are imposed on each item. Five points scale was used on the base of adaptability of the evaluation factors as the point imposing method. Excellent Internet resources were selected by imposing points on calculated evaluation index and by the standard points set by a library.
      Until these days, libraries and information service institutions could not perform systemic collection of resources because they have no selection criteria, although they feel the necessity of Internet resources. The result of this study will be utilized as the guidelines for resource development as well as that of Internet resource development.
      Expected utilities of this study are
      1) to provide basic guidelines in developing Internet resources into collections.
      2) to provide infrastructure which enable library to comprise network information and Internet resources as collections.
      3) to provide the guidelines in developing collection of electronic library.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 1. 서 론 = 1
      • 1.1 연구의 필요성 및 목적 = 1
      • 1.2 연구내용 및 방법 = 2
      • 1.3 용어의 정의 = 4
      • 2. 이론적 배경 = 7
      • 1. 서 론 = 1
      • 1.1 연구의 필요성 및 목적 = 1
      • 1.2 연구내용 및 방법 = 2
      • 1.3 용어의 정의 = 4
      • 2. 이론적 배경 = 7
      • 2.1 인터넷 자원의 특성 = 7
      • 2.2 인터넷 자원의 유형 = 14
      • 2.3 장서평가기준 및 요소 = 20
      • 2.4 선행연구 = 35
      • 3. 인터넷 자원 평가요소 분석 = 43
      • 3.1 선행연구에 나타난 평가요소 = 44
      • 3.2 서지 DB 전문기관의 평가요소 = 52
      • 3.3 전통적 자원 평가요소와의 비교 = 62
      • 4. 인터넷 자원 평가요소에 대한 설문조사 = 72
      • 4.1 조사의 목적 = 72
      • 4.2 조사의 내용 = 72
      • 4.3 조사방법 = 74
      • 4.4 조사결과의 분석 = 75
      • 5. 인터넷 자원 평가요소 설정 = 101
      • 5.1 평가요소 설정 = 101
      • 5.1.1 질적 품질 평가요소 = 101
      • 5.1.2 서비스 품질 평가요소 = 107
      • 5.1.3 정책적 평가요소 = 114
      • 5.2 설정된 요소에 따른 인터넷 자원 평가 = 120
      • 5.2.1 평가대상 선정 = 121
      • 5.2.2 실험 평가의 절차 = 122
      • 5.2.3 평가요소에 따른 적합성 평가 = 123
      • 5.2.4 요소적용에 대한 문제점 = 136
      • 6. 결 론 = 138
      • 참고문헌 = 142
      • = 151
      • <부록 1> 설문지 = 153
      • <부록 2> 적합성 평가표 = 162
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼