RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    Managing the Skies

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=G3601112

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The fundamental question this article seeks to answer concerns why the monopolitics sectoral controls by the central government were dispersed and delegated to various administrative units and localities in the way they did. More specifically, the question consists of the following two dimensions. The first concerns why, in the process of transitional reform, the central government chose to forfeit its exclusive controls over key industrial and public service sectors. The other dimension concerns the ways in which decentralization and delegation have been carried out in spatial terms. This study does not refute that the perspectives described above offer sensible explanations for the decisions to decentralize and delegate sectoral controls in reforming socialist systems and China in particular. It is suggested, however, that these macro-perspectives are not necessarily exhaustive in accounting for the particular ways in which different sectors of the Chinese economy have been deregulated spatially. That is, how closely an industrial sector had conventionally been interwoven with the military may constitute a key variable since the national-security imperative as well as the military's corporate interests could work strongly against the extensive decentralization and successful deregulation of the sector. Furthermore, efficiency at the firm level is not necessarily and automatically enhanced by the creation of a multiple number of firms in a sector. That is, if these firms are on the payroll of the government, which also has to operate as the regulator, market competition is less than ideal and, therefore, contributes little to firm efficiency.
    번역하기

    The fundamental question this article seeks to answer concerns why the monopolitics sectoral controls by the central government were dispersed and delegated to various administrative units and localities in the way they did. More specifically, the que...

    The fundamental question this article seeks to answer concerns why the monopolitics sectoral controls by the central government were dispersed and delegated to various administrative units and localities in the way they did. More specifically, the question consists of the following two dimensions. The first concerns why, in the process of transitional reform, the central government chose to forfeit its exclusive controls over key industrial and public service sectors. The other dimension concerns the ways in which decentralization and delegation have been carried out in spatial terms. This study does not refute that the perspectives described above offer sensible explanations for the decisions to decentralize and delegate sectoral controls in reforming socialist systems and China in particular. It is suggested, however, that these macro-perspectives are not necessarily exhaustive in accounting for the particular ways in which different sectors of the Chinese economy have been deregulated spatially. That is, how closely an industrial sector had conventionally been interwoven with the military may constitute a key variable since the national-security imperative as well as the military's corporate interests could work strongly against the extensive decentralization and successful deregulation of the sector. Furthermore, efficiency at the firm level is not necessarily and automatically enhanced by the creation of a multiple number of firms in a sector. That is, if these firms are on the payroll of the government, which also has to operate as the regulator, market competition is less than ideal and, therefore, contributes little to firm efficiency.

    더보기

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    1. Breaking the "Military Monopoly" : The Politics of Demilitarization
    2. Cracking the Center's Monopoly 1 : Corporatizing Decentralization
    3. Cracking the Center's Monopoly 2 : Deconcentration and Decentralization
    4. Irrationalities of Market Expansion
    5. Rationalization and Restructuring
    6. Conclusion : Similarities and Variations
    번역하기

    1. Breaking the "Military Monopoly" : The Politics of Demilitarization 2. Cracking the Center's Monopoly 1 : Corporatizing Decentralization 3. Cracking the Center's Monopoly 2 : Deconcentration and Decentralization ...

    1. Breaking the "Military Monopoly" : The Politics of Demilitarization
    2. Cracking the Center's Monopoly 1 : Corporatizing Decentralization
    3. Cracking the Center's Monopoly 2 : Deconcentration and Decentralization
    4. Irrationalities of Market Expansion
    5. Rationalization and Restructuring
    6. Conclusion : Similarities and Variations

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼