미상

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=G3601112
2002년
English
한국연구재단(NRF)
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
The fundamental question this article seeks to answer concerns why the monopolitics sectoral controls by the central government were dispersed and delegated to various administrative units and localities in the way they did. More specifically, the que...
The fundamental question this article seeks to answer concerns why the monopolitics sectoral controls by the central government were dispersed and delegated to various administrative units and localities in the way they did. More specifically, the question consists of the following two dimensions. The first concerns why, in the process of transitional reform, the central government chose to forfeit its exclusive controls over key industrial and public service sectors. The other dimension concerns the ways in which decentralization and delegation have been carried out in spatial terms. This study does not refute that the perspectives described above offer sensible explanations for the decisions to decentralize and delegate sectoral controls in reforming socialist systems and China in particular. It is suggested, however, that these macro-perspectives are not necessarily exhaustive in accounting for the particular ways in which different sectors of the Chinese economy have been deregulated spatially. That is, how closely an industrial sector had conventionally been interwoven with the military may constitute a key variable since the national-security imperative as well as the military's corporate interests could work strongly against the extensive decentralization and successful deregulation of the sector. Furthermore, efficiency at the firm level is not necessarily and automatically enhanced by the creation of a multiple number of firms in a sector. That is, if these firms are on the payroll of the government, which also has to operate as the regulator, market competition is less than ideal and, therefore, contributes little to firm efficiency.
다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
1. Breaking the "Military Monopoly" : The Politics of Demilitarization 2. Cracking the Center's Monopoly 1 : Corporatizing Decentralization 3. Cracking the Center's Monopoly 2 : Deconcentration and Decentralization ...
1. Breaking the "Military Monopoly" : The Politics of Demilitarization
2. Cracking the Center's Monopoly 1 : Corporatizing Decentralization
3. Cracking the Center's Monopoly 2 : Deconcentration and Decentralization
4. Irrationalities of Market Expansion
5. Rationalization and Restructuring
6. Conclusion : Similarities and Variations