RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      [보고서] 랑케의 ‘wie es eigentlich gewesen’ 본래 의미와 독일 역사주의 - 결과보고서

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=G3795019

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      국문 초록 (Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      본 학술논문은 연구 "랑케의 'wie es eigentlich gewesen'의 본래 의미와 독일 역사주의" 의 연구결과물이다.

      본 학술논문은 연구 "랑케의 'wie es eigentlich gewesen'의 본래 의미와 독일 역사주의" 의 연구결과물이다.

      더보기

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      One of the most famous answers to the question how to write history is to quote Ranke's argument that historians’ duty is “simply to show, how it really was.” His statement became a motto for historicism, the first model of history as a science. However, Ranke mentioned this on the basis of historical theology, which the ultimate purpose of understanding in history was to decode 'God's secret letters'. It is an irony that Ranke built the scientific model of history on the basis of historical theology that “every epoch is immediate to God.” From this paradox, ironical meanings of German historicism appeared since Ranke. This article explains the premises of historical theology which built the meta-history of Ranke's historicism first, and then analyses the possibility of rethinking Ranke's historicism from the perspective of our post-religious period.
      번역하기

      One of the most famous answers to the question how to write history is to quote Ranke's argument that historians’ duty is “simply to show, how it really was.” His statement became a motto for historicism, the first model of history as a science....

      One of the most famous answers to the question how to write history is to quote Ranke's argument that historians’ duty is “simply to show, how it really was.” His statement became a motto for historicism, the first model of history as a science. However, Ranke mentioned this on the basis of historical theology, which the ultimate purpose of understanding in history was to decode 'God's secret letters'. It is an irony that Ranke built the scientific model of history on the basis of historical theology that “every epoch is immediate to God.” From this paradox, ironical meanings of German historicism appeared since Ranke. This article explains the premises of historical theology which built the meta-history of Ranke's historicism first, and then analyses the possibility of rethinking Ranke's historicism from the perspective of our post-religious period.

      더보기

      국문 초록 (Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      1. 왜 랑케인가? 2. 랑케의 메타역사로서 역사신학 3. 랑케와 독일 역사주의 4. 랑케 역사학의 현재적 의미

      1. 왜 랑케인가?
      2. 랑케의 메타역사로서 역사신학
      3. 랑케와 독일 역사주의
      4. 랑케 역사학의 현재적 의미

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼