This study explores not only specific legal issues such as gender-based discrimination, which some statutes have expressly prohibited, but also general matters of discriminatory employment practice in workplace. The main argument is an Equal Treatmen...
This study explores not only specific legal issues such as gender-based discrimination, which some statutes have expressly prohibited, but also general matters of discriminatory employment practice in workplace. The main argument is an Equal Treatment Principle that employer should not treat employees differently in comparable group on employment conditions without good causes. It is the duty to treat equally employees with the same condition.
Therefore, the duty of equal treatment can be divided into the two categories. The former means that some statutes expressly put employer under the obligation. For example, there are many provisions prohibiting employment discrimination on the basis of gender, race, color, national origin, religion. The latter relatively can be understood as the implied obligation that is deduced from a legal construction through a general legal principle. The duty of equal treatment for employer itself is to be identified with the equal treatment principle on the sphere of employment law.
In relation to the equal treatment principle, it is important to consider harmonizing with the principle of private autonomy. If two principles come into conflict with each other in practice, an agreement between parties shall be considered prior to the equal treatment principle. It is the reason why there are specific provisions on some statutes prohibiting discriminatory practices in workplace.
Accordingly, Discriminatory practices by employer is classified into whether some practices are against clear provisions of statutes and whether some violate the duty of equal treatment through general legal principles. Each of them requires us to apply different criteria for reviewing cases in practice. One is a proportionality review for the former case, and the other is an abusive discretion doctrine for the latter.
After that, this tries to classify discriminatory practices into several categories and to apply the equal treatment principle to each discrimination by type in aspect of employment including hiring, compensations, employer's directions and dismissal. In case of hiring, unless applicants are covered with express provisions against specific discrimination, even if employer unequally treat the applicants for a job, it can not be regarded as a matter relating to discriminatory practice in employment, because the freedom to conclude a contract is prior to all others in the process of hiring. On the contrary, in the cases of compensations, employer's directions and dismissal, not only statutes prohibiting discrimination in employment but also the equal treatment principle are very important criteria for review of discriminatory practices. Besides, this deals with matters of the difference in employment conditions between regular employees and irregular employees including most of the fixed-term employees. And other subject is the doctrine of equal pay for equal work to men and women in the same establishment.
In conclusion, this argues that the legal proceeding protecting employees' right to be free from discrimination can be diversely instituted by the type of discriminatory practices. For example, if some employees are excluded from certain benefits with the basis of discriminatory practice, such as a discrimination in compensation, the right to demand on account of the difference should be granted to the injured employees. And if employer dismisses some employees from jobs with a discriminatory intention, it should be legally invalid in order to be free from the legal effect of the dismissal.