Quality Assessment of Images Projected Using Multiple Projectors = Quality Assessment of Images Projected Using Multiple Projectors

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Multiple projectors with partially overlapping regions can be used to project a seamless image on a large projection surface. With the advent of high-resolution photography, such systems are gaining popularity. Experts set up such projection systems by subjectively identifying the types of errors induced by the system in the projected images and rectifying them by optimizing (correcting) the parameters associated with the system. This requires substantial time and effort, thus making it difficult to set up such systems. Moreover, comparing the performance of different multi-projector display (MPD) systems becomes difficult because of the subjective nature of evaluation. In this work, we present a framework to quantitatively determine the quality of an MPD system and any image projected using such a system. We have divided the quality assessment into geometric and photometric qualities. For geometric quality assessment, we use Feature Similarity Index (FSIM) and distance-based Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT). For photometric quality assessment, we propose to use a measure incorporating Spectral Angle Mapper (SAM), Intensity Magnitude Ratio (IMR) and Perceptual Color Difference (ΔE). We have tested the proposed framework and demonstrated that it provides an acceptable method for both quantitative evaluation of MPD systems and estimation of the perceptual quality of any image projected by them.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 석주명, "Visual-Attention-Aware Progressive RoI Trick Mode Streaming in Interactive Panoramic Video Service" 한국전자통신연구원 36 (36): 253-263, 2014

2 A. K. Moorthy, "Visual Quality Assessment Algorithms : What does the future hold?" 51 (51): 675-696, 2011

3 G. Sharma, "The CIEDE2000 Color-Difference Formula: Implementation Notes, Supplementary Test Data, and Mathematical Observations" 30 (30): 2005

4 T. J. Yang, "Smart Display: A Mobile Self-Adaptive Projector-Camera System" 1-6, 2011

5 L. Juan, "SURF applied in Panorama Image Stitching" 495-499, 2010

6 H. S. Qureshi, "Quantitative Quality Assessment of Stitched Panoramic Images" 6 (6): 1348-1358, 2011

7 M. Harville, "Practical Methods for Geometric and Photometric Correction of Titled Projector" 5-, 2006

8 M. Solh, "MIQM : A Multicamera Image Quality Measure" 21 (21): 3902-3914, 2012

9 J. L. Starck, "Image Restoration with Noise Suppression Using the Wavelet Transform" 288 (288): 342-350, 1994

10 Atif Ahmed, "Geometric Correction for Uneven Quadric Projection Surfaces Using Recursive Subdivision of Bézier Patches" 한국전자통신연구원 35 (35): 1115-1125, 2013

11 L. Zhang, "FSIM : A Feature Similarity Index for ImageQuality Assessment" 20 (20): 2378-2386, 2011

12 D. Lowe, "Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints" 60 (60): 91-110, 2004

13 L. Wald, "Data Fusion: Definitions and Architectures – Fusion of Images of Different Spatial Resolutions"

14 J. Heinly, "Comparative Evaluation of Binary Features" 759-773, 2012

15 B. Sajadi, "Color Seamlessness in Multi-Projector Displays Using Constrained Gamut Morphing" 15 (15): 1317-1326, 2009

16 Y. Yang, "Color Image Quality Assessment Based on CIEDE2000" 2012

17 G. Wallace, "Color Gamut Matching for Tiled Display Walls" 1-10, 2003

18 Fairchild and Mark D, "Color Appearance Models" John Wiley and Sons 2005

19 B. Sajadi, "Auto Calibrating Tiled Projectors on Piecewise Smooth Vertically Extruded Surfaces" 17 (17): 1209-1222, 2011

20 L. Zou, "Assessment approach for image mosaicking algorithms" 50 (50): 1-3, 2011

21 B. Sajadi, "ADICT: Accurate Direct and Inverse Color Transformation" 72-86, 2010

22 M. Décombas, "A New Object Based Quality Metric Based on SIFT and SSIM" 1493-1496, 2012