<Abstract>This article critically reviews recent debates which have been raised since the publication of te author's two articles in 1993, criticizing the so-called "immanent approach" which was originally proposed by Song Doo-Y...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
<Abstract>This article critically reviews recent debates which have been raised since the publication of te author's two articles in 1993, criticizing the so-called "immanent approach" which was originally proposed by Song Doo-Y...
<Abstract>This article critically reviews recent debates which have been raised since the
publication of te author's two articles in 1993, criticizing the so-called
"immanent approach" which was originally proposed by Song Doo-Yul
as a new approach to North Korean Studies in 1988. Thus, the primary purpose of the
article is to rebut the author's critics and re-confirm his original position. First of all,
the author criticizes Song's rejoinder to the author which distinguishes between the
immanent and the external approaches in terms of the Kantain concepts of the
"immanent (empirical)-transcendent" pair, focusing mainly on the
vagueness surrounding his us of the word immanent (empirical). "Secondly, it
critically examines Kim Yon-Chol's argument which claims that the criteria of
distinction between the two approaches are vague and that the external approach is
transcendent. Next the paper criticizes the conceptual problems inherent in Lee
Chong-Sok's conception of the "immanent-critical approach." Finally, it
discusses the problems and limits facing the "phenomenological
approach" advanced by Choi Wan-Kyu. In conclusion, the author re-emphasizes
his original position that stresses the conflictual and complementary aspects of the two
approaches, based on the inherent duality of human action.