RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      정영사 혜원 『대승기신론의소』의 내용과 특징 - 정영소의 진찬문제에 대한 선행연구의 논의 정리와 평가를 겸하여 - = Some remarks of the Jingying Huiyuan's Commentary of the Awakening the Mahāyāna Faith

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106877516

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This paper aims to examine the previous researches on the authorship and the significant features of the Commentary of the Awakening the Mahāyāna Faith which is attributed to the renowned Dilun master Jingying Huiyan(523-592) (henceforth “Jingyingshu”), The results of this research can be summarized as follows:
      1) The authorship of the Jingyingshu has been controversial for several Centuries. One of the clues of the forgery is its writing style. Unlike other works of Jingying Huiyuan, the Jingyingshu contains unpolished sentences throughout the text. However, I argue that it is not so much a question since the early version of Jingying Huiyuan’s writings shows the same problem as well.
      2) The Jingyingshu interprets the term Kāya-traya thorugh the classification of the Ti(體), Xiang(相) and Yong(用). These three terms are identified with the Dharmakāya, the Saṃbhogakāya and the Nirmāṇakāya respectively. This way of interpretation is the original scheme of the Dilun School.
      3) The Jingyingshu quotes his another writing “The Meaning of the Two Hindrances(二障義)” in almost full length when explaining the defilement theory of the Awakening the Mahāyāna Faith. The previous research asserted that this quotation shows no consistency and pointed it as the decisive evidence of the apocryphalness of the Jingyingshu. However, as far as I can see, the Jingyingshu choose the most relevant analytics on the matter.
      In conclusion, the Jingyingshu can be regarded as a commentary written under the doctrinal influence of the Jingying Huiyan, if not composed by himself.
      번역하기

      This paper aims to examine the previous researches on the authorship and the significant features of the Commentary of the Awakening the Mahāyāna Faith which is attributed to the renowned Dilun master Jingying Huiyan(523-592) (henceforth “Jingying...

      This paper aims to examine the previous researches on the authorship and the significant features of the Commentary of the Awakening the Mahāyāna Faith which is attributed to the renowned Dilun master Jingying Huiyan(523-592) (henceforth “Jingyingshu”), The results of this research can be summarized as follows:
      1) The authorship of the Jingyingshu has been controversial for several Centuries. One of the clues of the forgery is its writing style. Unlike other works of Jingying Huiyuan, the Jingyingshu contains unpolished sentences throughout the text. However, I argue that it is not so much a question since the early version of Jingying Huiyuan’s writings shows the same problem as well.
      2) The Jingyingshu interprets the term Kāya-traya thorugh the classification of the Ti(體), Xiang(相) and Yong(用). These three terms are identified with the Dharmakāya, the Saṃbhogakāya and the Nirmāṇakāya respectively. This way of interpretation is the original scheme of the Dilun School.
      3) The Jingyingshu quotes his another writing “The Meaning of the Two Hindrances(二障義)” in almost full length when explaining the defilement theory of the Awakening the Mahāyāna Faith. The previous research asserted that this quotation shows no consistency and pointed it as the decisive evidence of the apocryphalness of the Jingyingshu. However, as far as I can see, the Jingyingshu choose the most relevant analytics on the matter.
      In conclusion, the Jingyingshu can be regarded as a commentary written under the doctrinal influence of the Jingying Huiyan, if not composed by himself.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 船山徹, "「漢譯」と「中國撰述」の間-漢文佛典に特有な形態をめぐって-" 45 (45): 2002

      2 최연식, "돈황사본 「대승기신론소」 연구" CIR 2017

      3 吉津宜英, "起信論と起信論思想-淨影寺慧遠の事例を中心にして" 63 : 2005

      4 금강대학교 불교문화연구소, "藏外地論宗文獻集成" CIR 2012

      5 吉津宜英, "浄影寺慧遠の起信論引用について" 49 (49): 2000

      6 吉津宜英, "浄影寺慧遠の「起信論疏」について-曇延疏との比較の視点から-" 21 (21): 1972

      7 岡本一平, "浄影寺慧遠「大乗起信論義疏」の成立問題" (3) : 2014

      8 正倉院文書硏究會, "正倉院文書硏究 권8" 吉川弘文館 2002

      9 吉津宜英, "慧遠「大乗起信論義疏」の研究" 34 : 1976

      10 吉津宜英, "慧遠の「起信論疏」をめぐる諸問題" 3 : 1972

      1 船山徹, "「漢譯」と「中國撰述」の間-漢文佛典に特有な形態をめぐって-" 45 (45): 2002

      2 최연식, "돈황사본 「대승기신론소」 연구" CIR 2017

      3 吉津宜英, "起信論と起信論思想-淨影寺慧遠の事例を中心にして" 63 : 2005

      4 금강대학교 불교문화연구소, "藏外地論宗文獻集成" CIR 2012

      5 吉津宜英, "浄影寺慧遠の起信論引用について" 49 (49): 2000

      6 吉津宜英, "浄影寺慧遠の「起信論疏」について-曇延疏との比較の視点から-" 21 (21): 1972

      7 岡本一平, "浄影寺慧遠「大乗起信論義疏」の成立問題" (3) : 2014

      8 正倉院文書硏究會, "正倉院文書硏究 권8" 吉川弘文館 2002

      9 吉津宜英, "慧遠「大乗起信論義疏」の研究" 34 : 1976

      10 吉津宜英, "慧遠の「起信論疏」をめぐる諸問題" 3 : 1972

      11 노권용, "如山柳炳德博士華甲紀念韓國哲學宗敎思想史" 원광대학교출판국 1990

      12 大竹晉, "大乗起信論成立問題の研究: 「大乗起信論」は漢文仏教文献からのパッチワーク" 國書刊行會 2017

      13 望月信亨, "大乗起信論之研究" 金尾文淵堂 1922

      14 Frédéric GIRARD, "地論思想の形成と變容" 國書刊行會 2010

      15 池田将則, "地論宗の研究" 國書刊行會 2017

      16 荒牧典俊, "北朝隋唐中國佛敎思想史" 法藏館 2000

      17 智清, "净影慧远「大乘起信论义疏」真伪考" (3) : 2016

      18 古勝隆一, "中國中古の學術" 研文出版 2006

      19 오타케 스스무, "<大乗起信論> 成立問題に関する近年の動向をめぐって" 불교문화연구소 (12) : 9-43, 2012

      20 이상민, "6세기 북조불교 연구" 해조음 2018

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (계속평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼